Quality Magazine
  Home
  Subscribe
  Subscribe to eNewsletter
  Subscription Customer Service
  Online
  Industry Headlines
  Web Exclusives
  Blogs
  Quality Product Spotlights
  White Papers on the Web
  Quality Downloads
  Webinars
  Quality Showcases
  e-Inserts Plus
  Online Store
  More Product Info
  Archive
  Q-Tube
  Q-Cast Podcasts
  Quality Showrooms
  Current Issue
  Coming Events
  Features
  Departments
  Columns
  Brain Teasers
  Products
  Quality Quick Clicks
  Special Sections
  NDT
  Vision & Sensors
  Aerospace
  How To Guide
  Global Editions
  China Editions
  Quality Guides
  Quality Buyers Guide
  Software Selector
  Registrars Guide
  Services Guide
  Quality Services
  Job Marketplace
  Industry Links
  Classifieds
  Career Center
  Events
  2009 Quality Conferences
  Quality Expo Detroit
  IMTS
  Meetings and Shows
  Industry Webinars
  Quality Awards
  2009 Quality Plant of the Year
  2009 Quality Professional of the Year
  Quality Leadership 100
  Quality Info
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Manufacturing Excellence: 10 Killers of Manufacturing Excellence
by Praveen Gupta
October 2, 2008

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare

Here is some more insight on identifying the roadblocks that stand in the way of achieving manufacturing excellence.


Editor’s note: In the second of a two-part series, more obstacles that keep many manufacturers from achieving manufacturing excellence are explained.



6. Implementation of quality management systems. It sounds counter-intuitive, however, recent focus on standardization and quality management systems has led to more registration audits, more quality auditors, and corrective and preventive action forms. Actually, quality management systems have diluted the executive involvement rather than enhancing the management responsibility. Effective deployment of quality management systems must facilitate realization of business objectives. For example, if the auto industry is not able to achieve its business objectives, the current quality management systems utterly failed in delivering expected value. Most quality management systems have been designed for compliance with minimal details; rather they focus on maximizing value with optimal details for consistency, creativity and controls.

7. Too much emphasis on improvement methods rather than results. Lean is a method lost in translation of Toyota’s methods and our own Sir Ford’s assembly designs. First it is a misnomer. Even Toyota does not call it Lean. Ford did not call it Lean when first deployed many decades ago.

Second, its deployment in the United States has violated its first principles of human relations, without which, success is impossible to realize. Imagine the outcome if the Lean leader is told to deploy Lean methods with the possibility of losing his job. If we pay attention to Toyota’s practices, one may interpret that Toyota Production System actually strives for achieving perfection for growth opportunities. We must see results.

Success comes not from cutting cost, instead it comes from achieving growth and doing well or perfectly. Similarly, while deploying Six Sigma there is too much emphasis on statistics instead of its intent of achieving virtual perfection.

8. Lack of incentives for learning. Corporate education is the first casualty of cost-cutting initiatives. Training provides the best return on investment. By cutting education, people just do what they are told to do. Cutting training is a message of losing liberty to speak and think, and a way of telling employees to do what they are told. Active minds will always outperform the numb ones. Active and excited employees will outperform the stressed ones. Learning creates excitement. We must continually invest in employee education for sustaining excellence and profitable growth.

9. Not listening to employees. Companies succeed with employees, yet fail without employee participation. Employees experience most of the problems that are included in the management report. Employees have solutions to known problems more often then we care to listen to their input. We must trust our employees’ intuition and capability. Having 200,000 to 300,000 people working in a company, how could it be possible we cannot solve any problem? Imagine 200,000 brains working on our challenges—a lot can be accomplished, given we enlist their support and listen to their ideas.

10. Conflicting political agenda. Frequently it has been observed that it is not the technical capability that eludes resolution of problems, instead it is the conflicting agenda at the management level that hinders progress. For example, management and the union leadership have conflicting agendas at the cost of achieving excellence, serving customers, taking care of employees and preserving a leadership position in the marketplace. Instead we all see the outcomes such as decreasing sales, huge financial losses, lost jobs, lost reputation and marginal decisions—the spiral of loss continues. If everyone in the company agrees to a common agenda of achieving perfection at all levels and in every function—bringing out innovative solutions, addressing customer needs, collaborating with suppliers and ensuring profitable growth—everyone will be happy they did. If we can visualize success, commit to achieving success and work together, we will be happy that we did.


Praveen Gupta
praveen@accelper.com
Praveen Gupta, president of Accelper Consulting (Schaumburg, IL), helps corporations in achieving excellence and profitable growth. He has published books including Six Sigma Business Scorecard and Business Innovation in the 21st Century. He can be reached at praveen@accelper.com.

|PrintEmail

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.

















Most Emailed Articles

  1. GE to Open Manufacturing Technology Center in Michigan
  2. NIST Seeks Proposals for $35 Million in Grants for Measurement Science
  3. Americans View Manufacturing as No. 1 Industry for Economic Prosperity
  4. DGI Supply Acquires Tool Crib Supply
  5. Quality at 400 Blades per Minute
  6. Quality 101: Surface Finish Measurement Basics
  7. Managing Changing Expectations: Corrective Action and Root Cause
  8. Buick and Jaguar Tie for Highest Vehicle Dependability
  9. Quality 101:Calibrating Micrometers
  10. Study Finds Threats to U.S. Manufacturing
Top Searches
  1. Quality Management Systems
  2. quality control concepts
  3. CALIBRATION SOFTWARE
  4. visual inspection
  5. "tolerances"
  6. GD&T
  7. Face of Quality
  8. cmm
  9. Product quality supervision
  10. "reliability"
Most Popular Articles
  1. GE to Open Manufacturing Technology Center in Michigan 07/01/2009
  2. Understanding ISO 13485 01/02/2008
  3. Managing Changing Expectations: Corrective Action and Root Cause 05/05/2009
  4. Obama Awards $8 Billion in Loans for Advanced Automotive Technologies 07/01/2009
  5. Quality 101: Surface Finish Measurement Basics 09/01/2004
  6. ISO/TS 16949: 2009 Available in Electronic Format 07/01/2009
  7. Cerion Completes Purchase of Contech 06/29/2009
  8. NAM Supports Dispute Settlement Affecting U.S.-China Trade Relationship 06/30/2009
  9. Quality 101: Improving Quality Through Lean Concepts 11/21/2007
  10. Face of Quality: What is Quality Anyway? 05/27/2009
© 2009 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy