Quality Magazine
  Home
  Subscribe
  Subscribe to eNewsletter
  Subscription Customer Service
  Online
  Industry Headlines
  eXtras
  Blogs
  Quality Product Spotlights
  White Papers on the Web
  Quality Downloads
  Webinars
  Quality Showcases
  e-Inserts Plus
  Online Store
  More Product Info
  Archive
  Q-Tube
  Q-Cast Podcasts
  Quality Showrooms
  Current Issue
  Coming Events
  Features
  Departments
  Columns
  Brain Teasers
  Products
  Quality Quick Clicks
  Special Sections
  NDT
  Vision & Sensors
  Aerospace
  How To Guide
  Global Editions
  China Editions
  Quality Guides
  Quality Buyers Guide
  Software Selector
  Registrars Guide
  Services Guide
  Quality Services
  Job Marketplace
  Industry Links
  Classifieds
  Career Center
  Q-Pons
  Events
  2010 Quality Conferences
  Quality Expo South 2010
  IMTS 2010
  Meetings and Shows
  Industry Webinars
  Quality Awards
  2010 Quality Plant of the Year
  2010 Quality Professional of the Year
  Quality Leadership 100
  Quality Info
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Manufacturing Excellence: 10 Killers of Manufacturing Excellence
by Praveen Gupta
October 2, 2008

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare

Here is some more insight on identifying the roadblocks that stand in the way of achieving manufacturing excellence.


Editor’s note: In the second of a two-part series, more obstacles that keep many manufacturers from achieving manufacturing excellence are explained.



6. Implementation of quality management systems. It sounds counter-intuitive, however, recent focus on standardization and quality management systems has led to more registration audits, more quality auditors, and corrective and preventive action forms. Actually, quality management systems have diluted the executive involvement rather than enhancing the management responsibility. Effective deployment of quality management systems must facilitate realization of business objectives. For example, if the auto industry is not able to achieve its business objectives, the current quality management systems utterly failed in delivering expected value. Most quality management systems have been designed for compliance with minimal details; rather they focus on maximizing value with optimal details for consistency, creativity and controls.

7. Too much emphasis on improvement methods rather than results. Lean is a method lost in translation of Toyota’s methods and our own Sir Ford’s assembly designs. First it is a misnomer. Even Toyota does not call it Lean. Ford did not call it Lean when first deployed many decades ago.

Second, its deployment in the United States has violated its first principles of human relations, without which, success is impossible to realize. Imagine the outcome if the Lean leader is told to deploy Lean methods with the possibility of losing his job. If we pay attention to Toyota’s practices, one may interpret that Toyota Production System actually strives for achieving perfection for growth opportunities. We must see results.

Success comes not from cutting cost, instead it comes from achieving growth and doing well or perfectly. Similarly, while deploying Six Sigma there is too much emphasis on statistics instead of its intent of achieving virtual perfection.

8. Lack of incentives for learning. Corporate education is the first casualty of cost-cutting initiatives. Training provides the best return on investment. By cutting education, people just do what they are told to do. Cutting training is a message of losing liberty to speak and think, and a way of telling employees to do what they are told. Active minds will always outperform the numb ones. Active and excited employees will outperform the stressed ones. Learning creates excitement. We must continually invest in employee education for sustaining excellence and profitable growth.

9. Not listening to employees. Companies succeed with employees, yet fail without employee participation. Employees experience most of the problems that are included in the management report. Employees have solutions to known problems more often then we care to listen to their input. We must trust our employees’ intuition and capability. Having 200,000 to 300,000 people working in a company, how could it be possible we cannot solve any problem? Imagine 200,000 brains working on our challenges—a lot can be accomplished, given we enlist their support and listen to their ideas.

10. Conflicting political agenda. Frequently it has been observed that it is not the technical capability that eludes resolution of problems, instead it is the conflicting agenda at the management level that hinders progress. For example, management and the union leadership have conflicting agendas at the cost of achieving excellence, serving customers, taking care of employees and preserving a leadership position in the marketplace. Instead we all see the outcomes such as decreasing sales, huge financial losses, lost jobs, lost reputation and marginal decisions—the spiral of loss continues. If everyone in the company agrees to a common agenda of achieving perfection at all levels and in every function—bringing out innovative solutions, addressing customer needs, collaborating with suppliers and ensuring profitable growth—everyone will be happy they did. If we can visualize success, commit to achieving success and work together, we will be happy that we did.


Praveen Gupta
praveen@accelper.com
Praveen Gupta, president of Accelper Consulting (Schaumburg, IL), helps corporations in achieving excellence and profitable growth. He has published books including Six Sigma Business Scorecard and Business Innovation in the 21st Century. He can be reached at praveen@accelper.com.

|PrintEmail

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.



















Most Emailed Articles

  1. Quality Management: Quality Leadership 100
  2. Understanding ISO 13485
  3. Quality Management: Quality Leadership 100
  4. Understanding ISO 13485
  5. Quality 101: Improving Quality Through Lean Concepts
  6. Case Studies: GM’s Garage of Dreams Captured in 3-D
  7. The Portable Leeb Test Turns 35
  8. Face of Quality: Link Strategic Planning to Quality Improvement
  9. Quality Innovations: Force Gage Fits the Bill
  10. 2010 Plant of the Year Award: Quality Starts on the Floor
Top Searches
  1. Calibration
  2. Quality Management Systems
  3. Quality 101
  4. control plans
  5. lean manufacturing
  6. GD&T
  7. Tracking Software
  8. plant of the year
  9. First Articles
  10. carl zeiss
Most Popular Articles
  1. Quality 101: Surface Finish Measurement Basics 09/01/2004
  2. Understanding ISO 13485 01/02/2008
  3. Feds May Seek More Authority on Vehicle Safety 03/16/2010
  4. Quality Management: Quality Leadership 100 01/29/2010
  5. Quality 101: Improving Quality Through Lean Concepts 11/21/2007
  6. Quality 101: An Introduction to Gage R&R 12/01/2005
  7. Second Boeing 747-8 Freighter Completes First Flight 03/16/2010
  8. Scanners Advance Portable Data Acquisition 12/21/2009
  9. Too Many Copies 02/26/2010
  10. Case Study: Design in Cost Reduction 02/25/2010
© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy
Your Feedback