Quality Magazine
  Home
  Subscribe
  Subscribe to eNewsletter
  Subscription Customer Service
  Online
  Industry Headlines
  eXtras
  Blogs
  Quality Product Spotlights
  White Papers on the Web
  Quality Downloads
  Webinars
  Quality Showcases
  e-Inserts Plus
  Online Store
  More Product Info
  Archive
  Q-Tube
  Q-Cast Podcasts
  Quality Showrooms
  Current Issue
  Coming Events
  Features
  Departments
  Columns
  Brain Teasers
  Products
  Quality Quick Clicks
  Special Sections
  NDT
  Vision & Sensors
  Aerospace
  How To Guide
  Global Editions
  China Editions
  Quality Guides
  Quality Buyers Guide
  Software Selector
  Registrars Guide
  Services Guide
  Quality Services
  Job Marketplace
  Industry Links
  Classifieds
  Career Center
  Events
  2010 Quality Conferences
  Quality Expo South 2010
  IMTS 2010
  Meetings and Shows
  Industry Webinars
  Quality Awards
  2011 Quality Plant of the Year
  2011 Quality Professional of the Year
  Quality Leadership 100
  Quality Info
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
The Last Word: ‘Big’ Problems For Toyota
by Thomas Sloma-Williams
December 22, 2009

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



Is bigger always better? It creates more revenue. It results in larger market share. It requires more people to be employed. On the surface, growing your company is a beneficial activity. However, increasing in size, manufacturing more products and garnering more market share does have its pitfalls, and often the shortcomings of rapid growth appear first in quality.

For Toyota Motor Corp., 2008 was a pivotal year. The company surpassed General Motors as the world’s largest carmaker, as measured by sales volume. However, coming on the heels of that accomplishment, 2009 showed Toyota that being the biggest comes with quality problems. Close to 4 million cars are being recalled for gas pedals that stick in floor mats, resulting in sudden acceleration. More than 100,000 Toyota Tundras are being recalled for rust problems that can jeopardize braking. Earlier in 2009, Toyota recalled nearly 100,000 Scions, Matrixes and Corollas for poor stopping in low temperatures.

It wasn’t too long ago that Toyota was number one in quality reputation. They have lost that position, according to an April 2009 study from U.S. Global Quality Research System, and are tied with Ford Motor Co., which is smaller in sales, but has steadily been improving car quality. According to a Sept. 30, 2009, article in BusinessWeek, “Toyota has had some recalls for engine sludge, bad ball joints, etc. Its own management has admitted that it grew too fast, especially in the United States, and took its eye off the ball in terms of quality amidst all that growth.”

According to Martin Zimmerman of the Los Angeles Times, “It’s a humbling comedown for an automaker that in the early years of this decade routinely had the fewest recalls among the six largest players in the U.S. auto market. In 2000, for example, Toyota recalled a mere 8,379 vehicles, according to government data.”

In 2005, the automaker had to recall more than 2.3 million vehicles. Among the problems were steering defects in certain pickup trucks and SUVs and a software glitch that could cause some Priuses to stall or shut down. In 2007, Toyota settled a class-action lawsuit filed by customers who complained of oil sludge buildup in their vehicles’ engines.

These quality defects are not publicly being attributed to any particular part of the Toyota process, but it seems that designers, purchasing agents and process engineers will be the first ones who will have to answer for some of these issues. Quality and manufacturing professionals also will be pushed for answers on how they let some of these defects pass.

A look at car manufacturer Ferrari would seem to further corroborate the idea that managed volume results in better quality. A recent program on The National Geographic Channel spotlighted the company’s facility in Maranello, Italy, focusing on the fabrication and assembly of the Ferrari 599. Defective parts simply are not allowed to proceed through the manufacturing process. From casting the aluminum engine block through the hand-stitched leather dashboard and trim, Ferrari pays excruciating detail to all aspects of production. The result is none of the problems the large manufacturers face with quality and recall issues.

Granted Ferrari is only selling about 250 of the 599s per year at a sticker price of $260,000, while Toyota sold nearly 9 million cars worldwide during 2008, with an average sticker price of more than 10 times less than a single 599. However, with Ferrari tolerating no defects in its products, the company can keep much of the nearly $65 million they generate on 599 sales alone each year. The tab in dollars and cents for Toyota is yet to be determined, but the damage to its reputation to quality could be more far reaching.

“There’s nothing else to the brand [Toyota],” said John Wolkonowicz, an analyst with consultant IHS Global Insight. “It’s not built on eye-catching design. It’s not built on a cutting-edge driving experience. It’s not built on performance. It’s built on quality and low-cost of ownership.”

Sometimes bigger isn’t always better.

Share your thoughts with me at williamst@bnpmedia.com, or share your thoughts with other Quality Magazine readers at the Quality Magazine LinkedIn Group page at http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=1876808.



Thomas Sloma-Williams
Tom is a past publisher of BNP Media.

|PrintEmail

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.

























Most Emailed Articles

  1. Quality Services Guide
  2. Face of Quality: A Model for Success
  3. Aerospace and Defense Companies Hiring, But Face Challenges Retaining Young Pros
  4. MEP Awards Grant to Support Green Building Technologies
  5. Don’t Punish Employees with Training
  6. GD&T: Friend or Foe?
  7. Outsourcing May Lead to Failure in Tough Times and in Good, Shows University of Utah Research
  8. Quality 101:Calibrating Micrometers
  9. Understanding ISO 13485
  10. Jim's Gems: Who is Ultimately Responsible?
Top Searches
  1. Quality 101
  2. Calibration
  3. Quality Management Systems
  4. case study
  5. six sigma
  6. control plans
  7. GD&T
  8. control charts
  9. First Articles
  10. project management
Most Popular Articles
  1. Quality 101: An Introduction to Gage R&R 12/01/2005
  2. Jim's Gems: Who is Ultimately Responsible? 08/25/2010
  3. Understanding ISO 13485 01/02/2008
  4. Lean Enterprise Institute Founder to Step Down 08/25/2010
  5. Quality 101: Surface Finish Measurement Basics 09/01/2004
  6. Quality Measurement: Effects of Screw-Thread Geometry 10/01/2005
  7. The Importance of Hypothesis Testing in Quality Management 09/30/2009
  8. Enhance First Article Inspection 07/16/2007
  9. Steps Toward Closing the Software Quality Gap 08/24/2010
  10. Quality 101: Improving Quality Through Lean Concepts 11/21/2007
© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy