The long awaited ASTM E18-07 Rockwell Hardness Standard has been released. While it is technically similar to the older version, some changes affect both users and service providers.

Here is a brief summary of the major changes:

Indenters

An automatic jominy tester with six samples is displayed here. Source: Newage Testing Instruments

All indenters require certifications and serial numbers. In the case of diamond indenters, there are now three classes, each class having different tolerances.

Class B diamond indenters are intended for everyday use.

Class A indenters are used for standardizing Class B indenters during the manufacturing process, and for troubleshooting by service technicians.

Reference diamonds are used to standardize Class A Diamonds.

In the past, to comply with E18, diamonds were required to have their shape verified on an optical comparator, and then undergo performance verification on test blocks. E18-07 now requires that each indenter have its geometrical attributes (angle and radius) physically measured to ensure compliance. This eliminates the go/no-go measurements allowed by the old standard.

What this means is that unless a manufacturer has a certification for a given diamond that states that it was physically measured and is compliant with the tolerances for geometry and performance outlined in E18-07, the machine cannot be certified to ASTM E18-07.

Indenter balls and indenter holders also will require independent certification, with indenter holders demonstrating that the indenter holder was performance verified, and that there is at least 0.3 millimeter protrusion of the ball from the ball cap. The indenter balls are certified for diameter, material and hardness. The new standard also ties an indenter to a machine. This means that an indenter must be verified, using an abbreviated indirect verification, and tied by serial number to a given machine, before it can be used to measure parts. The indenter must be verified on two test blocks for each scale that it is intended to be used on— for example, HRA, HRC or HR15N. A certificate, similar to the ones generated when a machine is certified, must be generated and kept. Users are allowed to perform this verification themselves.

Direct Verifications

This shows an inline automatic tester. Source: Newage Testing Instruments

Direct verifications are a means of inspecting individual critical attributes of a hardness tester. In a Rockwell hardness tester that includes measuring the force at preload, total force and force at elastic recovery (the reading position). The displacement measuring device must be isolated and verified. Additionally, the timing and machine hysteresis must be verified.

Direct verifications have always been done by testing machine manufacturers when machines are manufactured. They also were performed when machines are rebuilt, and as a diagnostic tool when the force, or measuring systems are suspect. The new standard now states a direct verification (less the timing) must be performed “When adjustments, modifications or repairs are made that could affect the application of test forces, the depth measuring system or the machine hysteresis.”

To comply with E18-07, if adjustments are made that affect any of these key elements, service technicians can no longer just rely on performance of the machine on test blocks. A direct verification must be done to ensure that all of these elements are in tolerance, and are not simply correct by “canceling errors.”

In other words, there may be cases where an instrument reads the test blocks within tolerance, but fails a direct verification. Under the new revision, these machines cannot be deemed “certifiable” unless the machine can be adjusted/repaired to pass both a direct and an indirect verification.

As Found Results

Rockwell indenter shows a closeup of the hardness test. Source: Newage Testing Instruments

The old revision of E18 was rather ambiguous regarding service technicians reporting as found results. E18- 07 now states that as found results must be obtained and recorded for every scale that is to be recertified. Historically, as founds were taken on the scale on which the machine was “as found.” This is a time-consuming process, not to mention the additional test block consumption, which may force providers to adjust their service pricing.

What Can You Do in the Interim?

If you are not prepared to meet the new revision of E18, service technicians can certify your instruments in accordance with ASTM E18-05, which is the previous version. Many companies are switching but the change is not yet universal. Q

Tech Tips

To comply with E18-07, if adjustments are made that affect any of these key elements, service technicians can no longer just rely on performance of the machine on test blocks.

A direct verification must be done to ensure that all of these elements are in tolerance, and are not simply correct by “canceling errors.”

There may be cases where an instrument reads the test blocks within tolerance, but fails a direct verification. Under the new revision, these machines cannot be deemed “certifiable” unless the machine can be adjusted/repaired to pass both a direct and an indirect verification.