Quality Magazine
  Home
  Subscribe
  Subscribe to eNewsletter
  Subscription Customer Service
  Online
  Industry Headlines
  eXtras
  Blogs
  Quality Product Spotlights
  White Papers on the Web
  Tech ManufactureXPO
  Quality Downloads
  Webinars
  Quality Showcases
  e-Inserts Plus
  Online Store
  More Product Info
  Archive
  Q-Tube
  Q-Cast Podcasts
  Quality Showrooms
  Brain Teasers
  Current Issue
  Coming Events
  Features
  Departments
  Columns
  Products
  Quality Quick Clicks
  Special Sections
  NDT
  Vision & Sensors
  Aerospace
  How To Guide
  China Editions
  Quality Guides
  Quality Buyers Guide
  Software Selector
  Registrars Guide
  Services Guide
  Quality Services
  Job Marketplace
  Industry Links
  Classifieds
  Career Center
  Events
  Quality Expo 2012
  IMTS 2012
  Meetings and Shows
  Industry Webinars
  Quality Awards
  2012 Quality Plant of the Year Nomination Form
  2012 Quality Professional of the Year Nomination Form
  Quality Leadership 100
  Quality Info
  Media Planning Guide
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Quality 101: Surface Finish Measurement Basics


September 1, 2004

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



In skidded gages, the sensitive, diamond-tipped stylus is contained within a probe, which has a skid that rests on the workpiece. Skidded gages (upper) measure roughness only. Skidless gages (lower) use an internal precision surface as a reference. This enables skidless gages to be used for measurements of waviness and form, in addition to roughness. Source: Mahr Federal Inc.


Ever since E.J. Abbot developed the first surface finish tester at the University of Michigan in the 1940s, industry has been aware that roughness is an important characteristic of machined surfaces.

The growing influence of surface finish can be traced to dramatic changes in manufacturing specifications and drastic tightening of dimensional tolerances over the past few decades. As a result of these changes, the proportion of the tolerance range, which is taken up by surface irregularities, has increased from roughly 15% in the 1940s to nearly 50% in some cases today.

Surface geometry is measured for two principle reasons: to try to predict the performance of the machined parts, such as engine pistons and fuel injection parts, and to try to control the manufacturing process.

A surface consists of three basic components: form, waviness and roughness. On a turned part, form is the result of errors in the way the lathe produces a part, commonly known as straightness errors, and waviness is a result of various vibrations, both in the machine tool and from outside sources. Roughness, on the other hand, is the result of feed-rate tool geometry, tool condition, and variations in material and hardness.

There are two general types of

surface-finish measuring systems: “skidded,” measuring roughness only, and “skidless,” evaluating form, waviness and roughness. In skidded gages, the sensitive, diamond-tipped stylus is contained within a probe, which has a skid that rests on the workpiece. Thus, skidded gages use the workpiece itself as the reference surface.

Skidless gages use an internal precision surface as a reference. This enables skidless gages to be used for measurements of waviness and form, in addition to roughness.

Because the three basic forms of surface geometry are caused by different factors and tend to have different relationships to the performance of the part, it is common to separate them during analysis. This separation is achieved by the selection of filter or cutoff settings that allow the operator to select the degree of filtering that will be applied to the measured profile.



Here, two very different surfaces have the same Ra. Source: Mahr Federal Inc.


The irregularities of the machined surface consist of high and low spots created by the tool bit or by a grinding wheel. These peaks and valleys can be measured and used to define the conditions and sometimes the performance of the surface. There are more then 100 ways to measure a surface and analyze the results, expressed as parameters, but for most cases, only a few are specified. Each of the parameters has its own advantages and limitations. Often one parameter is incapable of defining a surface adequately. Therefore, a complete definition of a surface often involves two or more parameters, and in some cases, the relationship or ratio of one parameter to another.

The most common parameter is Ra, or Arithmetic Average Roughness. It basically reflects the average height of roughness component irregularities from a mean line. Ra provides a simple value for accept/reject decisions. It is a default parameter on a drawing if not otherwise specified, and is available even in the least sophisticated instruments. Ra is not a good discriminator for different types of surfaces as it is incapable of differentiating between “spiky” and “scratched” surfaces having the same Ra. Additional parameters should be specified for this purpose, such as Rp (Maximum Peak Height), Rv (Maximum Valley Depth) and Ry (Maximum Peak-to-Valley Roughness Height).

In Europe, the more common parameter for roughness is Rz, or Mean Roughness Depth. It is the average distance between the highest peak and the deepest valley in five sampling lengths, or cutoffs. Rz is more sensitive then Ra to the changes in surface finish because maximum profile heights, and not the averages, are being examined. There is no firm conversion between Ra and Rz parameters, as the actual ratio depends upon the shape of profile, but the approximate ratio of Rz = x4 - x7Ra could be used.



Surface finish measurement procedures, general terminology, definitions of most parameters and filtering information can be found in American Standard ASME B46.1 - 2002, Surface Texture, and in International Standards, ISO 4287 and ISO 4288.



|PrintEmail

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.


























Most Emailed Articles

  1. Management: A Closer Look: Understanding Risk Management for Medical Device Manufacturers
  2. Auto Industry Goes on U.S. Hiring Binge
  3. Jim’s Gems: Don’t Focus on What Seems Unfair
  4. GD&T Workshop: A Top Down View
  5. Understanding ISO 13485
  6. Other Dimensions: Does New Stuff Have to be Calibrated?
  7. Software & Analysis: FMEAs for the Medical Industry: Which FMEA Type Should I Use?
  8. Face of Quality: Focus on the Vital Few
  9. Software & Analysis: FMEAs for the Medical Industry: Which FMEA Type Should I Use?
  10. Quality 101: Surface Finish Measurement Basics
Top Searches
  1. Quality 101
  2. variation management
  3. Quality Management Systems
  4. quality inspector
  5. root cause
  6. quality performance indicators
  7. quality assurance
  8. LEAN Quality Management Systems
  9. surface finish
  10. employee involvment
 
Most Popular Articles
  1. Measurement: The Democratization of Measurement 01/27/2012
  2. Test & Inspection: Sensing the Thread 01/30/2012
  3. U.S. Manufacturing Making a Comeback 02/01/2012
  4. Management: A Closer Look: Understanding Risk Management for Medical Device Manufacturers 01/03/2012
  5. Understanding ISO 13485 01/02/2008
  6. Quality 101: An Introduction to Gage R&R 12/01/2005
  7. Other Dimensions: Does New Stuff Have to be Calibrated? 01/31/2012
  8. Jim's Gems: Think Ahead 01/30/2012
  9. Quality Management 2.0: Deming's 7 Deadly Diseases of Management 01/20/2012
  10. Quality Measurement: Effects of Screw-Thread Geometry 10/01/2005
© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy