Quality Magazine
  Home
  Subscribe
  Subscribe to eNewsletter
  Subscription Customer Service
  Online
  Industry Headlines
  eXtras
  Blogs
  Quality Product Spotlights
  White Papers on the Web
  Quality Downloads
  Webinars
  Quality Showcases
  e-Inserts Plus
  Online Store
  More Product Info
  Archive
  Q-Tube
  Q-Cast Podcasts
  Quality Showrooms
  Current Issue
  Coming Events
  Features
  Departments
  Columns
  Brain Teasers
  Products
  Quality Quick Clicks
  Special Sections
  NDT
  Vision & Sensors
  Aerospace
  How To Guide
  Global Editions
  China Editions
  Quality Guides
  Quality Buyers Guide
  Software Selector
  Registrars Guide
  Services Guide
  Quality Services
  Job Marketplace
  Industry Links
  Classifieds
  Career Center
  Q-Pons
  Events
  2010 Quality Conferences
  Quality Expo South 2010
  IMTS 2010
  Meetings and Shows
  Industry Webinars
  Quality Awards
  2010 Quality Plant of the Year
  2010 Quality Professional of the Year
  Quality Leadership 100
  Quality Info
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Brain Teasers: Matching Components
by Dr. Sophronia Ward
November 24, 2008

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



Anyone who has faced a production problem with a need to solve it by using production data can relate to the notion of a brain teaser. The brain teasers presented here are based on real-world situations encountered by workers in manufacturing environments. The brain teasers have three parts: (1) the situation, (2) available data or other supporting information and (3) questions that various workers need answered for continual improvement. Recommended solutions follow in the next issue and on the Web at Quality Online (www.qualitymag.com).


Situation

Isaac is a process engineer for a company that makes custom components and assemblies for construction customers. The sales group in his company has assured several customers that these components are specially matched during assembly. Isaac decided to investigate the benefits of the matching program for one assembly of an insert and a socket. He is interested in how two gap measurements behave if the components are assembled randomly compared to the gap measurements when the components are matched.


Available Data

Isaac gathered data from a set of 15 inserts and sockets. He measured the two critical dimensions—bore and pin—on the 15 inserts and the 15 sockets. These data are summarized in the table, “Bore and Pin Dimensions for Inserts and Sockets.” Also included in the table are the numbers used to form the matched assemblies as well as the targets and tolerances for each dimension.


Questions

1. What is the process behavior of each dimension for the 15 sockets and inserts? Consider the data are in time order as presented.

2. What can you predict about the gaps for bore and pin if the components are assembled randomly?

3. What is the behavior of the gaps for bore and pin for the matched components?

4. What is the benefit of the matching process?


Answers to November Brain Teaser

Amy is the global director of operations for her company and in this capacity she attends many meetings where business information—financial and marketing—is summarized using graphs, some with “trend lines” superimposed over the data. She found these trend lines could obscure the correct interpretation of the data. Many managers were comfortable with the trend lines so Amy decided to present data with and without this line.

Q: What message is implied using the data in time order with a trend line?
A: Trend lines imply a constant change from one time period to the next over time for the particular measurement on display. However, not all measurements change by a constant amount each time period.

Q: How can the use of a trend line make it difficult to find important messages?
A: If, as is often the case, a change results from a policy decision or a customer change, the data will experience a step jump—up or down—followed by a sustained flat period at a new average. See the graph of the data without the trend line. In other situations, the changes might be shown by a period of increasing or decreasing values followed by a sustained flat period at a new average. In other words, changes over time rarely have the behavior of a trend in the data values.

Q: Analyze the data using a process behavior chart. What message is communicated using this analysis?
A: The individuals and moving range chart of weekly sales shows that sales are increasing with the first part of the series below the overall average line and the last part of the series above the average line. See the graph “Weekly Sales Dollars.” An analysis of each quarter separately shows that each 13-week period has a different average that is sustained over the 13 weeks. See the graph “Weekly Sales Dollars with Three Sets of Limits.”

Q: What business decisions are impacted by a misinterpretation of data using a trend line?
A: Business decisions such as forecasting, predicting customer complaints, projecting customer orders or sales using trend lines with the data can lead an organization to expect a particular result in the future that is not justified. Using trend lines that do not match the process changes lead to a misunderstanding of the messages in the data and projections that are unsupported.


Dr. Sophronia Ward
Dr. Sophronia Ward is a continual improvement specialist and Six Sigma Senior Master Black Belt and Coach. Brain teasers are now incorporated in the new training programs, Six Sigma Training for Champions, Black Belts and Green Belts, offered by Dr. Ward and her associates at Pinnacle Partners Inc. For more information, call (865) 482-1362 or visit www.pinnaclepartnersinc.com.

|PrintEmail

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.



















Most Emailed Articles

  1. Quality Management: Quality Leadership 100
  2. Understanding ISO 13485
  3. Quality Management: Quality Leadership 100
  4. Quality 101: Improving Quality Through Lean Concepts
  5. The Portable Leeb Test Turns 35
  6. Face of Quality: Link Strategic Planning to Quality Improvement
  7. Quality Innovations: Force Gage Fits the Bill
  8. 2010 Plant of the Year Award: Quality Starts on the Floor
  9. Optimize Your Quality Management System
  10. Case Study: Design in Cost Reduction
Top Searches
  1. Calibration
  2. Quality 101
  3. control charts
  4. Quality Management Systems
  5. GD&T
  6. control plans
  7. lean manufacturing
  8. plant of the year
  9. Tracking Software
  10. First Articles
Most Popular Articles
  1. Feds May Seek More Authority on Vehicle Safety 03/16/2010
  2. Second Boeing 747-8 Freighter Completes First Flight 03/16/2010
  3. Quality 101: Surface Finish Measurement Basics 09/01/2004
  4. Quality 101: Improving Quality Through Lean Concepts 11/21/2007
  5. Too Many Copies 02/26/2010
  6. Quality 101: An Introduction to Gage R&R 12/01/2005
  7. Understanding ISO 13485 01/02/2008
  8. Quality Management: Quality Leadership 100 01/29/2010
  9. Jim's Gems: Understanding Creativity 03/15/2010
  10. Developing the Staff You Already Have 02/26/2010
© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy
Your Feedback