Quality Magazine
  Home
  Subscribe
  Subscribe to eNewsletter
  Subscription Customer Service
  Online
  Industry Headlines
  eXtras
  Blogs
  Quality Product Spotlights
  White Papers on the Web
  Tech ManufactureXPO
  Quality Downloads
  Webinars
  Quality Showcases
  e-Inserts Plus
  Online Store
  More Product Info
  Archive
  Q-Tube
  Q-Cast Podcasts
  Quality Showrooms
  Brain Teasers
  Current Issue
  Coming Events
  Features
  Departments
  Columns
  Products
  Quality Quick Clicks
  Special Sections
  NDT
  Vision & Sensors
  Aerospace
  How To Guide
  China Editions
  Quality Guides
  Quality Buyers Guide
  Software Selector
  Registrars Guide
  Services Guide
  Quality Services
  Job Marketplace
  Industry Links
  Classifieds
  Career Center
  Events
  Quality Expo 2012
  IMTS 2012
  Meetings and Shows
  Industry Webinars
  Quality Awards
  2012 Quality Plant of the Year Nomination Form
  2012 Quality Professional of the Year Nomination Form
  Quality Leadership 100
  Quality Info
  Media Planning Guide
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
From the Editor: Detroit Making Strides
by Gillian Campbell
June 30, 2009

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



New vehicles sold by Chrysler, Ford Motor Co. and General Motors Co.’s domestic brands have improved in initial quality by 10% when compared to last year, according to the J.D. Power and Associates 2009 Initial Quality Study (IQS) released in June.

While this is better than the 8% improvement rate achieved by the industry overall, it still puts the domestic automakers behind their foreign counterparts. Lexus, Porsche, Cadillac, Hyundai and Honda took the top honors in this year’s survey.

In addition to Cadillac, GM’s Chevrolet brand performed above the industry average. For the Ford Motor Co., only its Ford and Mercury brands performed above the industry average. Chrysler, which recently emerged from bankruptcy, did not have any of its brands score above the industry average.

The survey measures overall quality during the first 90 days of ownership, including design and mechanical issues. Overall, the 2009 industry average for initial quality is 108 problems per 100 vehicles (PP100), which is down from 118 PP100 in 2008. Initial quality for domestic brands has improved to an average of 112 PP100 in 2009 from 124 PP100 in 2008, according to the report.

We all have encountered people who will not purchase the first few model years of a vehicle or a newly redesigned model until “the bugs have been worked out.” The good news is that this year’s study shows quality is improving in the first generation of vehicles and redesigned autos.

Historically, all-new models typically have below-average levels of initial quality, but this year several all-new models fared better than their segment averages including the Hyundai Genesis, Kia Borrego, Toyota Venza and Volkswagen CC. The redesigned models that showed improvement from prior models include the Acura TL, Ford F-150, Honda Pilot and Nissan Z.

“Achieving high levels of initial quality in all-new models is one of the greatest challenges for manufacturers,” said David Sargent, vice president of automotive research at J.D. Power and Associates. “Now that more manufacturers are getting their launch quality right straight out of the gate, consumers can expect the quality of new vehicles to continue to rise.”

Improving initial quality is a start for the Detroit automakers, but will it be enough to change people’s perceptions of them? Sargent adds that quality enhances an automaker’s reputation for reliability, a critical purchase consideration for many consumers. It is, but how much does quality influence the average consumer’s decision? Is it enough to bring back the Big Three?

Share your thoughts with me at campbellg@bnpmedia.com or with other readers on LinkedIn at http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=1876808.


Gillian Campbell
Gillian is Editor for Quality magazine. You can reach her at campbellg@bnpmedia.com

|PrintEmail

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.




























Most Emailed Articles

  1. Management: A Closer Look: Understanding Risk Management for Medical Device Manufacturers
  2. Other Dimensions: Does New Stuff Have to be Calibrated?
  3. Auto Industry Goes on U.S. Hiring Binge
  4. Jim’s Gems: Don’t Focus on What Seems Unfair
  5. GD&T Workshop: A Top Down View
  6. Understanding ISO 13485
  7. Test & Inspection: Sensing the Thread
  8. Software & Analysis: FMEAs for the Medical Industry: Which FMEA Type Should I Use?
  9. Shifting the Paradigm: Business System Analyses for Identifying Areas to Improve
  10. ISO 13485: Medical Devices and Risk Management
Top Searches
  1. Quality 101
  2. Quality Management Systems
  3. quality assurance
  4. quality inspector
  5. quality performance indicators
  6. LEAN Quality Management Systems
  7. surface finish
  8. root cause
  9. variation management
  10. optical inspection
 
Most Popular Articles
  1. Other Dimensions: Does New Stuff Have to be Calibrated? 01/31/2012
  2. Quality 101: Nondestructive Testing 02/22/2008
  3. Quality 101: An Introduction to Gage R&R 12/01/2005
  4. Understanding ISO 13485 01/02/2008
  5. 50 Years of Quality--Take Another Look at Nondestructive Testing 10/23/2011
  6. Measurement: The Democratization of Measurement 01/27/2012
  7. Aerospace Industry To Face Challenges in 2012 02/07/2012
  8. Quality Measurement: Effects of Screw-Thread Geometry 10/01/2005
  9. U.S. Manufacturing Making a Comeback 02/01/2012
  10. Quality 101: Surface Finish Measurement Basics 09/01/2004
© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy