Quality Magazine
  Home
  Subscribe
  Subscribe to eNewsletter
  Subscription Customer Service
  Online
  Industry Headlines
  eXtras
  Blogs
  Quality Product Spotlights
  White Papers on the Web
  Quality Downloads
  Webinars
  Quality Showcases
  e-Inserts Plus
  Online Store
  More Product Info
  Archive
  Q-Tube
  Q-Cast Podcasts
  Quality Showrooms
  Current Issue
  Coming Events
  Features
  Departments
  Columns
  Brain Teasers
  Products
  Quality Quick Clicks
  Special Sections
  NDT
  Vision & Sensors
  Aerospace
  How To Guide
  Global Editions
  China Editions
  Quality Guides
  Quality Buyers Guide
  Software Selector
  Registrars Guide
  Services Guide
  Quality Services
  Job Marketplace
  Industry Links
  Classifieds
  Career Center
  Events
  2010 Quality Conferences
  Quality Expo South 2010
  IMTS 2010
  Meetings and Shows
  Industry Webinars
  Quality Awards
  2011 Quality Plant of the Year
  2011 Quality Professional of the Year
  Quality Leadership 100
  Quality Info
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Case Studies: Reducing RFID Label Design Time

February 4, 2008

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare

This shows the predicted surface currents and far-field radiation pattern. Source: Flomerics Inc.


Kamen, Germany-based Sentronik GmbH has reduced the time required to develop radio frequency identification (RFID) labels from 7 to 10 days to 2 to 3 days by simulating the labels with Flomerics’ (Marlborough, MA) MicroStripes electromagnetic simulation software. Sentronik also has been able to improve the read rate on labels to between 99 and 100% by optimizing their design in the simulation domain. “Simulation greatly improves the design process by enabling our engineers to evaluate the performance of many possible designs without having to build physical prototypes,” says Georg Siegel, chief executive officer of Sentronik.

Sentronik supplies RFID labels for a wide range of applications in the manufacturing, distribution and retail industries. The company specializes in building custom labels that provide high read rates in tough applications where conventional labels fail. Design of RFID labels is challenging because of the difficulty of sorting out the many factors that can affect performance, such as the material to which the tags are attached, the orientation of the tags, power constraints and operating frequency variations.

These problems are difficult to address using traditional experimental methods because the large number of design parameters that impact read performance means that only a small area of the design space can be explored using physical experiments. In the past, Sentronik engineers relied upon calculations with spreadsheets and math calculation programs. These calculations were only rough approximations because they did not take the geometry of the labels and environment into account.

“MicroStripes has substantially improved our design process by providing an environment that enables us to define the geometry of a new design and predict its performance,” Siegel says. “We originally selected MicroStripes software because it is easier to use than other electromagnetic simulation software that we looked at. We also modeled several of our existing designs in the software and checked the results against physical tests and saw that they provided a very good match.”

Sentronik engineers usually begin the simulation process by importing a DWG file containing the geometry of the initial concept design into MicroStripes. They assign material properties to the different components of the label. They typically begin by exciting the label in free space with a wire feed and calculate the return and radiation pattern of the antenna. Engineers often evaluate many different designs until they are happy with the performance. The next step is simulating the performance of the label in a more realistic environment. Then they re-tune the antenna to resonate at the desired frequency in its installed environment.

“MicroStripes makes it possible to validate and optimize the performance of our designs before we even build the first prototype,” Siegel says. “This saves time and avoids wasting money building prototypes that don’t work. We can predict the return loss and radiation pattern of RFID tags under a wide range of real-world operating conditions in order to ensure high read rates. Electromagnetic simulation gives us a significant competitive advantage by helping us to design labels that provide better performance than those of our competitors.”
    Flomerics Inc.
    (508) 357-2012
    www.flomerics.com


Benefits

  • Sentronik reduced RFID label design time by two-thirds with MicroStripes EM software.

  • With the software, Sentronik has been able to improve the read rate on labels to between 99 and 100%.

  • By making it possible to validate and optimize the performance of designs before they are built, the software saves Sentronik time and money.


  • |PrintEmail

    Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.

























    Most Emailed Articles

    1. Quality Services Guide
    2. MEP Awards Grant to Support Green Building Technologies
    3. Aerospace and Defense Companies Hiring, But Face Challenges Retaining Young Pros
    4. Don’t Punish Employees with Training
    5. GD&T: Friend or Foe?
    6. Face of Quality: A Model for Success
    7. GD&T: Friend or Foe?
    8. Outsourcing May Lead to Failure in Tough Times and in Good, Shows University of Utah Research
    9. Quality 101:Calibrating Micrometers
    10. Understanding ISO 13485
    Top Searches
    1. Quality 101
    2. Calibration
    3. Quality Management Systems
    4. case study
    5. six sigma
    6. control plans
    7. GD&T
    8. control charts
    9. First Articles
    10. project management
    Most Popular Articles
    1. Quality 101: An Introduction to Gage R&R 12/01/2005
    2. Jim's Gems: Who is Ultimately Responsible? 08/25/2010
    3. Understanding ISO 13485 01/02/2008
    4. Lean Enterprise Institute Founder to Step Down 08/25/2010
    5. Quality 101: Surface Finish Measurement Basics 09/01/2004
    6. Quality Measurement: Effects of Screw-Thread Geometry 10/01/2005
    7. The Importance of Hypothesis Testing in Quality Management 09/30/2009
    8. Enhance First Article Inspection 07/16/2007
    9. Steps Toward Closing the Software Quality Gap 08/24/2010
    10. Quality 101: Improving Quality Through Lean Concepts 11/21/2007
    © 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy