Quality Magazine
  Home
  Subscribe
  Subscribe to eNewsletter
  Subscription Customer Service
  Online
  Industry Headlines
  eXtras
  Blogs
  Quality Product Spotlights
  White Papers on the Web
  Quality Downloads
  Webinars
  Quality Showcases
  e-Inserts Plus
  Online Store
  More Product Info
  Archive
  Q-Tube
  Q-Cast Podcasts
  Quality Showrooms
  Current Issue
  Coming Events
  Features
  Departments
  Columns
  Brain Teasers
  Products
  Quality Quick Clicks
  Special Sections
  NDT
  Vision & Sensors
  Aerospace
  How To Guide
  Global Editions
  China Editions
  Quality Guides
  Quality Buyers Guide
  Software Selector
  Registrars Guide
  Services Guide
  Quality Services
  Job Marketplace
  Industry Links
  Classifieds
  Career Center
  Q-Pons
  Events
  2010 Quality Conferences
  Quality Expo South 2010
  IMTS 2010
  Meetings and Shows
  Industry Webinars
  Quality Awards
  2010 Quality Plant of the Year
  2010 Quality Professional of the Year
  Quality Leadership 100
  Quality Info
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Case Studies: Correcting Low First-Pass Yield

December 30, 2008

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



Williamette Valley Co. (WVCO, Eugene, OR) produces polyurethane systems used in many industrial applications. In the past, the company had difficulty maintaining high yields when producing these products.

WVCO puts each batch of its polyurethane technology through a demanding battery of tests before shipping it to customers. In the past, WVCO was not satisfied with the production yield. Some batches had to be corrected because of variability in the set time—the amount of time required for the product to solidify after the components are mixed. Another issue was that foaming was seen in some batches. This made it necessary to rework the batch because of its effects on product appearance and performance.


One-Factor-at-a-Time Experiments

WVCO’s manufacturing plants are challenged at times with extremes in both temperature and humidity. Plant management had experimented with changing process variables and also had attempted to determine the effect of ambient conditions on responses such as product yield. They had typically varied one factor at a time, such as mixing speed, for a series of batches. The problem with this approach is that it is not able to detect interactions between variables that often have a major impact on key responses. One-factor-at-a-time experimenters often optimize a particular factor only to discover later that after changing other factors, the value that used to be optimal for the first factor no longer provides good results.

The WVCO chemist set out to increase manufacturing yield by designing an experiment that would simultaneously measure the impact of key factors on the critical responses. He hoped to identify not only first order, but also second order and multiple factor effects. The chemist suspected that the ambient conditions at the production plant created a major impact on yield by increasing moisture. The experiments were run at the company’s research facility in Oregon where it was not possible to vary humidity levels during the experiments. In order to overcome this problem and simulate a variety of environment conditions, the chemist spiked the resin with moisture based on measurements made at the production plant.


Design of Two-Level Factorial Experiment

The chemist designed a two-level factorial experiment using Design-Expert statistical-analysis software from Stat-Ease Inc. (Minneapolis). “We selected Design-Expert because it excels at solving real-world industrial problems,” says Dr. Phil Cote, WVCO’s director of research and development. “Design-Expert has a very intuitive user interface that is geared for engineers, as opposed to statisticians. It provides virtually every experimental design or statistical tool that it would ever make sense to use in an industrial environment. It also saves large amounts of time by automating most of the experimental design and results analysis process.” The factors considered in the experiment are shown in Table 1.


The software generated an experiment design consisting of 20 runs that targeted the end and center points of each variable. A Morehouse Cowles laboratory mixer equipped with a disk dispenser was used to prepare the resins. The responses shown in Table 2 were measured. A Brookfield DV-II viscometer equipped with a number 5 spindle was used to measure the viscosity of each resin. The set time was checked by hand mixing at a two-to-one ratio using standard laboratory techniques. It was measured as soon as the mixing was completed and again five days after the process was finished in order to evaluate drift during storage.


Experiment Results Enable Increase in Yield

The chemist entered the results of the experiments back into Design-Expert. The software then provided a variety of statistical analyses. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) results shown in Table 3 demonstrate that the set time and foam were significantly affected by the experiment factors. Note that the significance of these factors increased after the five-day period. This indicates that adventitious moisture is an insidious problem that does not reveal its full impact immediately.

Evaluation of the test factors revealed substantial interactions between the factors. For example, at a low mixing speed, mixing time has little effect on initial set time. However, at a high mixing speed, time has a major effect on initial set. Strong interactions between the mixing speed and mixing time factors also were seen in their effect on foam formation.

After studying the statistical results, the chemist concluded that moisture was the immediate cause of reduced yield. The experiment results also revealed that the effects of moisture could be minimized by reducing the mixing speed and mixing time. The probable cause is that the speeds used in the past generated turbulence that increased the uptake of moisture in the batch.

The experiment showed that the resin could be thoroughly mixed at a lower speed in less time while avoiding the buildup of moisture that had previously hurt yields. The experiment results provided unassailable proof that yields and throughput could be increased by changing processing conditions. When the new optimizing mixing times and speeds were implemented at the production plant, the yields immediately increased. When this change was implemented at the production plant, first-pass yield in the production plant increased by 65% and throughput in the facility increased by 20%.
    Stat-Ease Inc.
    (612) 378-9449
    www.statease.com


Benefits

  • Because Design-Experiment software from Stat-Ease can provide a two-level factorial experiment, WVCO gained the advantage in solving a production problem regarding low yield and product defects.

  • First-pass yield has been increased from 30% to 85%.

  • Throughput has been increased 20%.


  • |PrintEmail

    Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.



















    Most Emailed Articles

    1. Quality Management: Quality Leadership 100
    2. Understanding ISO 13485
    3. Quality Management: Quality Leadership 100
    4. Quality 101: Improving Quality Through Lean Concepts
    5. The Portable Leeb Test Turns 35
    6. Face of Quality: Link Strategic Planning to Quality Improvement
    7. Quality Innovations: Force Gage Fits the Bill
    8. 2010 Plant of the Year Award: Quality Starts on the Floor
    9. Optimize Your Quality Management System
    10. Case Study: Design in Cost Reduction
    Top Searches
    1. Calibration
    2. Quality 101
    3. control charts
    4. Quality Management Systems
    5. GD&T
    6. control plans
    7. lean manufacturing
    8. plant of the year
    9. Tracking Software
    10. First Articles
    Most Popular Articles
    1. Feds May Seek More Authority on Vehicle Safety 03/16/2010
    2. Second Boeing 747-8 Freighter Completes First Flight 03/16/2010
    3. Quality 101: Surface Finish Measurement Basics 09/01/2004
    4. Too Many Copies 02/26/2010
    5. Quality 101: Improving Quality Through Lean Concepts 11/21/2007
    6. Quality 101: An Introduction to Gage R&R 12/01/2005
    7. Understanding ISO 13485 01/02/2008
    8. Quality Management: Quality Leadership 100 01/29/2010
    9. Jim's Gems: Understanding Creativity 03/15/2010
    10. Optimize Your Quality Management System 11/30/2009
    © 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy
    Your Feedback