Quality Magazine
  Home
  Subscribe
  Subscribe to eNewsletter
  Subscription Customer Service
  Online
  Industry Headlines
  eXtras
  Blogs
  Quality Product Spotlights
  White Papers on the Web
  Quality Downloads
  Webinars
  Quality Showcases
  e-Inserts Plus
  Online Store
  More Product Info
  Archive
  Q-Tube
  Q-Cast Podcasts
  Quality Showrooms
  Current Issue
  Coming Events
  Features
  Departments
  Columns
  Brain Teasers
  Products
  Quality Quick Clicks
  Special Sections
  NDT
  Vision & Sensors
  Aerospace
  How To Guide
  Global Editions
  China Editions
  Quality Guides
  Quality Buyers Guide
  Software Selector
  Registrars Guide
  Services Guide
  Quality Services
  Job Marketplace
  Industry Links
  Classifieds
  Career Center
  Events
  2010 Quality Conferences
  Quality Expo South 2010
  IMTS 2010
  Meetings and Shows
  Industry Webinars
  Quality Awards
  2011 Quality Plant of the Year
  2011 Quality Professional of the Year
  Quality Leadership 100
  Quality Info
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
A New Look At Vision Measurement
by Marc Stalker
May 28, 2009

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare

With feature-based measurement the vision measurement software uses the feature type information to create the geometry and evaluate it. A range of features now are supported, including 2-D profile, which is shown here. Source: Wilcox Associates
CAD-based measurement software has lead to improvements in today’s vision measurement systems.


Multisensor measurement systems are capable of collecting geometric data from 3-D parts using various combinations of measurement technologies. For the most part, such systems are based on vision systems made more versatile by the addition of tactile probes as well as lasers, white light and other devices. This allows confident measurement of parts using the most appropriate combination of probes for the job at hand, without compromising accuracy.

There has been a tremendous improvement in the multisensor system’s primary sensor: the camera. Some of this owes to the enhancement of mechanical equipment and optics, but the bulk is the result of advancement in computer-aided design (CAD)-based measurement software.


CAD Integration

Vision became a mainstream measurement technology when equipment and software vendors made the transition from text-based programming and operating environments to CAD-based systems. Parts are designed in CAD, and computer numerical controlled (CNC) tool paths are generated in computer-aided manufacturing (CAM). It only made sense to complete the manufacturing cycle using CAD as well.

Now that many vendors have made the initial transition, they are quickly implementing improvements to their systems. For example, they are adding intelligence to their software that automatically adjusts parameters such as lighting, focus and magnification based on settings in the software and real-time feedback from the camera.

With CAD, vision systems are moving away from conventional approaches to defining geometries. Older software required operators to take measurements by first designating the feature type to be measured and then collecting the associated data according to pre-defined rules. New software is eliminating those restrictions. Now, instead of having to tell the software the type of feature to measure beforehand, the operator simply collects vector points on the geometry of interest. The software automatically recognizes the feature type and then constructs and evaluates it. This works for an ever-growing list of feature types, including points, lines, ellipses, circles, squares notches and slots. Because of these improvements, programming and operating a vision system has become significantly easier and more comparable to using a coordinate measuring machine (CMM).


Lighting, Focus and Magnification

Rather than making the operator manually apply filters to an image to detect weak edges, some vision software have algorithms that automatically detect the appropriate edge based on operator-selectable criteria. Here a matching edge algorithm detects a weak circle. Source: Wilcox Associates
Vision measurement has a reputation for being fussy. Magnification, focus and lighting requirements vary not only in relation to each other but also as changes occur in types of geometries and materials measured, not to mention variations in the measurement equipment itself. Until recently, operators had to take these into account when measuring and adjust for them. By automating the vision measurement process, some vendors have nearly eliminated the need for manual adjustments.

For example, software now lets operators calibrate the illumination of vision machines so that extremely linear and accurate measurements are provided for a range of illumination intensities and material reflectivity. Additional functions automatically adjust lighting intensity on-the-fly to improve contrast. This works by having algorithms that evaluate contrast in the area of interest and then make adjustments if needed. Some measurement software can even adjust lux values to compensate for the gradual loss of illumination intensity over time. This is a particularly useful feature with LED type systems.

Controlling focus is another area of improvement. Again, algorithms evaluate edge strength and decide if it is necessary to refocus to improve accuracy. This functionality improves measurement cycles by selectively eliminating the need to refocus every time the camera pauses over a new area of interest. In addition, some software allows for calibration of focus on individual machines for optimal measurement speed and accuracy. This can be particularly useful when the same parts may be measured on more than one vision system, including different models.

Edge Strength. Hard probes know an edge when they meet one. Traditional vision systems have numerous filters that operators have to adjust to boost edge strength. These require specialized knowledge in determining when and where to apply which type of filter.

A newer and much easier approach is to let the software decide which filters to use at the time of measurement. The software evaluates the condition and lighting of the feature it is about to measure. Then, based on an operator-defined measurement objective, it uses built-in intelligence to decide which edge-strength algorithm will provide the best results for the task. There is no operator intervention, and the result is faster and more accurate measurement.

Measurement Efficiency. Some of latest vision software releases take advantage of dual and quad core central processing units (CPUs) so that imaging and image processing can take place simultaneously.

Accuracy. Conventional wisdom might deem accuracy to be solely dependent on optics and equipment characteristics. In truth, well conceived and well executed measurement software makes a significant contribution to accurate, repeatable vision results. And as the mathematics gets better so will the measurement results.

CAD-based software has moved vision measurement into the manufacturing mainstream. Whether in the quality lab or on the shop floor, manufacturers are finding it to be at least as useful and flexible as any other measurement tool. Because of both the integration of CAD into vision measurement and ongoing software improvements, vision is no longer an esoteric measurement technology best left to highly trained and experienced specialists.


Tech Tips

  • Advancements in computer-aided design (CAD)-based measurement software are driving improvement in today’s vision measurement systems.

  • Such software simplifies the interface between operator and vision system, providing ease of measurement.

  • Because of a high level of system automation, such software has nearly eliminated the need for operators to make adjustments in magnification, focus and lighting.


  • Marc Stalker
    Marc Stalker is global product manager of PC-DMIS Vision for Wilcox Associates, a Hexagon Metrology Co. (North Kingstown, RI). For more information, call (800) 343-7933 or visit www.pcdmis.com.

    |PrintEmail

    Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.

























    Most Emailed Articles

    1. Quality Services Guide
    2. Face of Quality: A Model for Success
    3. Aerospace and Defense Companies Hiring, But Face Challenges Retaining Young Pros
    4. MEP Awards Grant to Support Green Building Technologies
    5. Don’t Punish Employees with Training
    6. GD&T: Friend or Foe?
    7. Outsourcing May Lead to Failure in Tough Times and in Good, Shows University of Utah Research
    8. Quality 101:Calibrating Micrometers
    9. Understanding ISO 13485
    10. Jim's Gems: Who is Ultimately Responsible?
    Top Searches
    1. Quality 101
    2. Calibration
    3. Quality Management Systems
    4. case study
    5. six sigma
    6. control plans
    7. GD&T
    8. control charts
    9. First Articles
    10. project management
    Most Popular Articles
    1. Quality 101: An Introduction to Gage R&R 12/01/2005
    2. Jim's Gems: Who is Ultimately Responsible? 08/25/2010
    3. Understanding ISO 13485 01/02/2008
    4. Lean Enterprise Institute Founder to Step Down 08/25/2010
    5. Quality 101: Surface Finish Measurement Basics 09/01/2004
    6. Quality Measurement: Effects of Screw-Thread Geometry 10/01/2005
    7. The Importance of Hypothesis Testing in Quality Management 09/30/2009
    8. Enhance First Article Inspection 07/16/2007
    9. Steps Toward Closing the Software Quality Gap 08/24/2010
    10. Quality 101: Improving Quality Through Lean Concepts 11/21/2007
    © 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy