Industry Headlines

Spending Increases as Automakers Entice Toyota Customers

SANTA MONICA, CA - Edmunds.com, an online resource for automotive information, estimated that the average automaker incentive in the United States was $2,588 per vehicle sold in February 2010, up $248, or 10.6%, from January 2010, but down $422, or 14%, from February 2009.

“Incentive spending went up last month for most major automakers as they tried to lure Toyota buyers to their brand,” says Jessica Caldwell, director of industry analysis for Edmunds.com. “Toyota needs to stay competitive in this area while rebuilding confidence in their vehicles.”

According to Edmunds.com, combined incentives spending for domestic manufacturers averaged $3,394 per vehicle sold in February 2010, up from $2,968 in January 2010. From January 2010 to February 2010, European automakers increased incentives spending by $12 to $2,494 per vehicle sold; Japanese automakers increased incentives spending by $270 to $1,853 per vehicle sold; and Korean automakers decreased incentives spending by $630 to $1,676 per vehicle sold.

In February 2010, the industry's aggregate incentive spending is estimated to have totaled approximately $2.03 billion, up 24.8% from January 2010. Chrysler, Ford and General Motors spent an aggregate of $1.2 billion, or 58% of the total; Japanese manufacturers spent $571 million, or 28.3%; European manufacturers spent $165 million, or 8.2%; and Korean manufacturers spent $110 million, or 5.5%.

“February was the first time since August 1998 that Ford outsold General Motors,” says Edmunds.com Senior Analyst Michelle Krebs in her report on AutoObserver.com. “Ford has a lot of momentum right now, while GM has essentially stopped selling four of its brands.”

Among vehicle segments, large trucks had the highest average incentives, $4,194 per vehicle sold, followed by premium luxury car at $4,023. Subcompact cars had the lowest average incentives per vehicle sold, $1,205, followed by sport cars at $1,394. Analysis of incentives expenditures as a percentage of average sticker price for each segment shows large trucks averaged the highest, 12.4%, followed by large cars at 11.4% of sticker price. Premium sport cars averaged the lowest with 1.7% and sport cars followed with 4.2% of sticker price.

Comparing all brands, in February smart spent the least, $341 followed by Scion at $426 per vehicle sold. At the other end of the spectrum, Lincoln spent the most, $5,568, followed by Hummer at $5,195 per vehicle sold. Relative to their vehicle prices, Saturn and Hummer spent the most, 14.9% and 13.6% of sticker price, respectively; while Porsche spent 1.4 and smart spent 2.3%.

Edmunds.com's monthly True Cost of Incentives (TCI) report takes into account all automakers' various U.S. incentives programs, including subvented interest rates and lease programs, as well as cash rebates to consumers and dealers. To ensure the greatest possible accuracy, Edmunds.com bases its calculations on sales volume, including the mix of vehicle makes and models for each month, as well as on the proportion of vehicles for which each type of incentive was used.

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to Quality Magazine. 

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Multimedia

Videos

Podcasts

Bill Arbogast explains his perspective on quality, ISO 9001, and how to manage inevitable business changes.


Read: The 2013 Quality Professional of the Year

 
More Podcasts

THE MAGAZINE

Quality Magazine

june 2013 magazine cover

2013 June

Check out the June 2013 edition of Quality Magazine for features about Measurement, Software and Test & Inspection.
Table Of Contents Subscribe

Plant of the Year

Which is the most important factor in considering a Quality plant of the Year?
View Results Poll Archive

THE QUALITY MAGAZINE STORE

M:\General Shared\__AEC Store Katie Z\AEC Store\Images\Quality\prac-field-guide-for-iso.gif
A Practical Field Guide for ISO 9001:2008

The purpose of this field guide is to assist organizations, step by step, in implementing a quality management system (QMS) in conformance with ISO 9001:2008, whether from scratch or by transitioning from ISO 9001:2000. It examines each sub-clause of Sections 4–8 of ISO 9001:2008, which contain the requirements, and gives a list of the documentation/documents required, internal audit questions, a summary of management’s responsibilities, and a flowchart of the steps that need to be undertaken to satisfy the requirements.

More Products

Clear Seas Research

qcast_ClearSeas_logo.gifWith access to over one million professionals and more than 60 industry-specific publications,Clear Seas Research offers relevant insights from those who know your industry best. Let us customize a market research solution that exceeds your marketing goals.

eNewsletters

STAY CONNECTED

facebook_40.png twitter_40px.png  youtube_40px.pnglinkedin_40px.png