Measurement / Automotive / Aerospace / Test & Inspection / Management / Medical
Test & Inspection

Manage Materials Testing Costs

How to calculate ROI and justify an investment in a materials testing system

January 3, 2013
/ Print / Reprints /
ShareMore
/ Text Size+
Trans

When talking with prospects and customers, testing machine manufacturers often come across symptoms that imply the current situation could be improved dramatically with a new investment in technology, specifically a well-engineered materials testing system. The problem often surrounds the ability of local management to persuade the budget holder to release funds for the investment.

The first thing to state is that senior management is motivated by the return on their capital far more than whether a budget exists. There are many items in a budget that are never spent. Every major expenditure that a company makes is driven far more by the return on that investment than it is by whether it is covered by a budget. So the key is to build a credible Return on Investment (ROI) paper that decision makers relate to and is comparable to other prospective investments they might make. In the materials testing system world there are two obvious scenarios.

Scenario 1: Outsourcing

In this scenario the company outsources its material testing needs to an outside testing laboratory. The key components to an ROI calculation are as follows:

  1. The cost of each test
  2. The number of tests done per year
  3. The value of stock tied up at the outsourcer
  4. The cost of borrowing of the company
  5. The time required by the outsourcer to do the tests
  6. Penalties historically incurred (if any) due to deadlines being missed
  7. Assumed cost of an operator to run the new machine
  8. The potential investment in a new system

By bringing these components together as illustrated in the following spreadsheets, it is possible to demonstrate in most cases an ROI percentage in excess of 100%.

Line 3 produces the total outsourced cost for the year by multiplying the number of tests by the cost of each test. Line 8 produces the cost of holding material while we wait for the test to complete. This involves estimating the value of materials tied up, the number of weeks it is held in stock waiting for the test to be completed, and the annual cost of borrowing of the company. So in this example $200,000 is multiplied by 8% multiplied by 1/52 to arrive at $76,923. Line 9 is an estimate of penalties incurred in a year due to deadlines being missed. Line 10 is the estimated annual cost of an operator to manage the new machine. The ROI percentage is calculated by dividing the total net cost savings, line 11 by the total cost of investment, line 12 to arrive at 241%.

Scenario 2: Replacement System

In this scenario the company is considering replacing aging equipment with a new material testing system with full automation. The key components to an ROI calculation are as follows:

  1. Estimated current time to complete a test
  2. Expected time to complete a test using the new system
  3. Number of tests performed each day
  4. Cost of an operator per hour
  5. Dollar value of shipments in a year
  6. Time lost in hours per year by using the aging current system
  7. The percentage of lost revenue per year

By bringing these components together as illustrated in the accompanying spreadsheet, it is possible to demonstrate in most cases an ROI percentage in excess of 100%.

Line 10 produces a total cost saving by generating the time saved in minutes each day, by using the new machine, line 5, extrapolating that to time saved in hours per year, line 8 and multiplying by the operator cost per hour, line 9.

Line 16 produces the lost revenue figures related to the lost time by using the aging machine. Note this lost time at line 12 is the same time we worked out at line 8. We convert the lost time in hours per year into days, then based on 240 days in this example, we derive an percent of lost revenue, line 15. In this case we lost 3% of the annual shipments due to lost time which is 3% of $3 million or $75,000. The ROI percentage is again calculated by taking the total benefits, line 17 and dividing by the total proposed investment, line 18 to arrive at an ROI percentage of 235%.

It is important to ensure that the assumptions made are realistic and that the author of the ROI paper owns the assumptions made. By translating the material testing issues into the classic language of ROIs, your proposal will carry far greater weight, be better understood, be comparable with other investment decisions and will lead to better decision making.

Materials Testing Machine Costs

There are multiple costs associated with purchasing and operating a materials testing machine. Before you begin testing, not only do you need to consider the purchase price of the machine, but shipping, installation and site modification costs as well. Shipping costs may run between $500 to $2,500 or more depending on size and weight. If the machine is large and your facility has no clear route between the loading dock and test lab, then you may need to hire a rigger to uncrate the tester and transport the machine to the lab. Rigging costs vary greatly depending on issues like having to traverse stairs or remove a door or window. Prior to placing the machine in the lab, you must also determine if the floor is rated to support the weight of the machine and if you have the required electrical power installed in the room.

Once the machine is installed in the lab, it will need to be calibrated. Many labs have their testers calibrated annually, biannually, quarterly or monthly depending upon requirements. Calibration procedures within North America are governed by the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM). Common calibration specifications for a universal testing machine are:

  • ASTM E4 Standard Practices for Force Verification of Testing Machines
  • ASTM E83 Standard Practices for Verification and Classification of Extensometer Systems
  • ASTM E1012 Standard Practice for Verification of Test Frame and Specimen Alignment Under Tensile and Compressive Axial Force Application
  • ASTM E2309 Standard Practices for Verification of Displacement Measuring Systems and Devices Used in Materials Testing Machines

Several testing machine manufacturers have their own captive calibration organizations. Other manufacturers work with a network of regionally located independent service calibration businesses. The independent service providers are less expensive, sometimes half the cost, of the manufacturer based providers. In addition, they are usually more flexible on schedule.

Start-up training is included in the purchase price of most testing machines. The experience of the testing machine operators usually dictates how much training is required. You should plan on one day as a minimum. The variety and complexity of the tests and the features included in the software/controller are other factors that dictate how much training is required. One person should be appointed as the technical liaison between the testing machine operators and machine manufacturer, as in the event you experience issues with your tests, the technical liaison will be more efficient in helping the manufacturer to resolve your problems. One other consideration is the turnover of your testing machine operators and how much training the replacements require. Will the technical liaison be able to provide training or will the manufacturer need to be brought in at additional cost?

Testing machine maintenance can be as simple as keeping the machine free of broken sample fragments and periodically lubricating moving parts. Additional maintenance may be required if, for example, you are performing tensile tests on very hard and brittle materials. Extensometer knife edges may require replacement and grip faces typically need frequent cleaning and/or replacement. When considering software upgrades, verify that the software is compatible with your computer operating system. Some upgrades may require you to add more memory to your computer. If your testing machine software/controller is old, replacement may be the only upgrade option. If you find yourself in this situation, not only should you explore upgrade options with the machine manufacturer but you might want to discuss your upgrade options with other vendors. Oftentimes, you will find an upgrade from a vendor other than the machine manufacturer better fits your needs, is easier to use, and costs less.


 

TECH TIPS

  • When considering a new purchase, build a credible Return on Investment (ROI) paper for decision makers.
  • By translating the material testing issues into the language of ROIs, your proposal will carry far greater weight.
  • It also will be better understood, be comparable with other investment decisions and will lead to better decision making.

 

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to Quality Magazine. 

Recent Articles by Richard Gedney

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Multimedia

Videos

Podcasts

Charles J. Hellier has been active in the technology of nondestructive testing and related quality and inspection fields since 1957. Here he talks with Quality's managing editor, Michelle Bangert, about the importance of training.
More Podcasts

Quality Magazine

CoverImage

2014 October

Check out the October 2014 edition of Quality Magazine for features!

Table Of Contents Subscribe

The Skills Gap

What is the key to solving the so-called skills gap in the quality industry?
View Results Poll Archive

Clear Seas Research

qcast_ClearSeas_logo.gifWith access to over one million professionals and more than 60 industry-specific publications,Clear Seas Research offers relevant insights from those who know your industry best. Let us customize a market research solution that exceeds your marketing goals.

STAY CONNECTED

facebook_40.png twitter_40px.png  youtube_40px.pnglinkedin_40px.png  

eNewsletters