Manufacturers Feeling the Heat, Changing Their Ways
ATLANTA, GA, October 27-Manufacturers are changing business practices and embracing green initiatives in light of rising fuel and energy costs, according to a survey conducted by MFG.com, an online marketplace for the manufacturing industry.
The MFGWatch survey asked buyers to describe their business's response to the rising cost of fuel. 30% stated they would raise prices to their customers, 29% would make savings or productivity gains in other areas and 14% would absorb the cost and accept lower profitability. 21% responded there would be no changes, while the remaining buyers would react by asking suppliers to charge less.
When asked what changes were planned to lower or offset fuel costs for their businesses, buyers replied:
28% of the participants are buying materials from suppliers closer to their facilities
25% are reviewing all transportation and logistics providers contract arrangements
22% are planning no changes
18% are changing their approach to production, for example, moving from make-to-stock to make-to-order
7% are changing their warehousing, distribution and service center locations and/or strategies regarding supply chain network design
In addition to transportation costs rising as a result of fuel price increases, buyers were asked to identify associated factors impacting their businesses:
42% of the participants had increased raw materials costs, for example, oil derivatives such as plastics and chemicals
22% of buyers encountered increased costs for manufacturing processes requiring heating and cooling
12% of the respondents experienced reduced demand for their, or their customers, products or services
9% of buyers had greater difficulty attracting and retaining staff
3% responded that they were losing sales to more energy efficient competitors
Going Green
When asked if their company was actively pursuing green manufacturing practices, 51% of the participants responded affirmatively, 36% stated no changes were being made, and 12% did not know if their companies were pursuing green initiatives. The affirmative respondents were asked to describe the green initiatives they were currently practicing:
25% are recycling manufacturing waste
22% are reducing waste through more efficient manufacturing practices
17% have minimized power consumption through more efficient machine use
16% use recycled materials as a part of their raw materials
16% use green materials, such as wood from managed forests, toxic-chemical free materials and bio-degradable materials
Buyers employing green-manufacturing practices also were asked how it affected their bottom line:
29% stated green practices saves them money
27% stated green practices attracts more business
20% did not know if there was an effect on their bottom line
13% stated green practices have no effect
12% responded that green manufacturing practices cost them more money
The survey also inquired if buyers were developing new products to reduce their own fuel-related costs, such as reducing the size and weight of components and intermediate packaging. Sixty six percent of the participant responded negatively, while 28% stated they were developing new products. Six percent did not know if their companies were taking steps to develop new products.
Buyers were asked if they were developing new offerings that would enable their customers to reduce the fuel costs associated with using their products and services. Thirty one percent of respondents stated they were developing new offerings, while 60% stated they were taking no steps in this direction.
More than 450 North American respondents from the MFG.com buyer community completed the survey, with 88.2% of the participants from the United States and 11.8% from Canada. Participants included engineers, purchasing professionals and operations managers.
The MFGWatch survey asked buyers to describe their business's response to the rising cost of fuel. 30% stated they would raise prices to their customers, 29% would make savings or productivity gains in other areas and 14% would absorb the cost and accept lower profitability. 21% responded there would be no changes, while the remaining buyers would react by asking suppliers to charge less.
When asked what changes were planned to lower or offset fuel costs for their businesses, buyers replied:
In addition to transportation costs rising as a result of fuel price increases, buyers were asked to identify associated factors impacting their businesses:
Going Green
When asked if their company was actively pursuing green manufacturing practices, 51% of the participants responded affirmatively, 36% stated no changes were being made, and 12% did not know if their companies were pursuing green initiatives. The affirmative respondents were asked to describe the green initiatives they were currently practicing:
Buyers employing green-manufacturing practices also were asked how it affected their bottom line:
The survey also inquired if buyers were developing new products to reduce their own fuel-related costs, such as reducing the size and weight of components and intermediate packaging. Sixty six percent of the participant responded negatively, while 28% stated they were developing new products. Six percent did not know if their companies were taking steps to develop new products.
Buyers were asked if they were developing new offerings that would enable their customers to reduce the fuel costs associated with using their products and services. Thirty one percent of respondents stated they were developing new offerings, while 60% stated they were taking no steps in this direction.
More than 450 North American respondents from the MFG.com buyer community completed the survey, with 88.2% of the participants from the United States and 11.8% from Canada. Participants included engineers, purchasing professionals and operations managers.
Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!