This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies
By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn More
This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
Quality Magazine logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Quality Magazine logo
  • Home
  • The Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Digital Edition
    • Archives
    • How To Guide
    • Industry News
    • Subscribe
  • Web Exclusives
    • Blogs
    • NDT Exclusives
    • Quality Exclusives
    • Vision & Sensors
  • New Products
  • Channels
    • Management
    • Measurement
    • NDT
    • Quality 101
    • Software
    • Test & Inspection
    • Vision & Sensors
  • Markets
    • Aerospace
    • Automotive
    • Electronics
    • Energy
    • Green Manufacturing
    • Medical
    • Plastics
  • More
    • Leadership 100 Survey
    • Plant of the Year
    • Professional of the Year
    • Job Board
    • White Papers
    • Quality Store
    • Software Downloads
    • eCards
    • Product Spotlights
    • Industry Links
    • Sponsor Insights
    • Market Research
  • Multimedia
    • eNewsletter
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Showcases
    • Image Galleries
    • Interactive Spotlights
  • Events
    • IMTS
    • Event Calendar
    • Quality Show
  • InfoCenters
    • Manage Quality, Risk & Compliance
    • Material Science Quality within Microscopy
    • Modern Quality Control with SPC
    • Process Control in Manufacturing
  • Directories
    • Buyers Guide
    • NDT Sourcebook
    • V&S Sourcebook
    • Take a Tour
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
Home » Readers Respond: Is Quality Defined in Terms of the Customer?
Quality Exclusives

Readers Respond: Is Quality Defined in Terms of the Customer?

June 15, 2011
Reprints
No Comments
In the first of Qualitymag.com’s Readers Respond series, quality professionals tackle the debate about who really dictates quality.



Is quality defined in terms of the customer? The answer varies depending on whom you’re asking.

In the case of Quality’s LinkedIn members, there have been more than 60 of those answers-and counting.

In April, Forbes published some positive commentary about the new edition of Juran’s Quality Handbook: The Complete Guide to Performance Excellence . Blogger Steve Denning remarked on how the concept of quality management began decades ago as internally-driven methodology that only recently has incorporated customer expectations into its characterization. This is a good thing, Denning points out, arguing that “all too often quality management in its various forms and labels has come to mean improving quality in the sense of internal processes and conformity to internal specifications. In a word, bureaucracy.”

Dozens of quality professionals took the time to respond to the piece, and a selection of their comments is presented here. What are your thoughts on the matter? Please comment below to share your opinions.

Readers Respond

  • Otto Geiseman, sales, marketing and product marketing professional:

    “There is a tendency to confuse product grade with product quality. These are quite different metrics. Low or poor performance, function or fit may or may not be a function of quality but it may indeed be a function of grade. As such quality with in grade is indeed a quality as perceived by the customer and there is no difference between internal and external quality.”



  • Dan Towsley, inspector at SIHI Pumps Ltd:

    “Defining quality as "fitness for purpose" is, in my opinion, a nice refinement of the former accepted definition; that being fitness for use. However, let's not be too hasty in completely doing away with the former definition.

    Fitness for use-by the customer-ties in nicely with the main thrust of the article. Of course, fitness for purpose should take into account any and all customer needs and requirements... so that more or less ties the loop.

    I happen to own a copy of Juran's 6th edition Quality Handbook. A nice and timely addition is the chapter on eco-quality... for environmental sustainability. Anyone at all versed in green themes; carbon footprints etc. should find this chapter quite interesting. No green-washing here!”



  • James Johnson Quality Management Systems Manager at APEX Piping Systems Inc.:

    “Yes, it is. The classic downfall, in my opinion, of quality practitioners is not understanding the place of quality in the business model. Business is about selling something to customers. If quality, as a definable and objective characteristic or as a theoretical idea, is not what a customer wants, they will not buy the product...it's as simple as that.”



  • Douglas H. Hoover, principal optical engineer at Reichert Inc:

    “I must disagree. Quality clearly needs to remain "Meeting the specifications, first time, every time, without exception." In the referenced article we also see "exceed customers' expectations." [This is] a "feel-good phrase," as we all should know that an expectation is an undefined or undocumented need or requirement.

    While the ultimate goal is to thrill the customer, you first have to define exactly what the customer needs and get that into the product specification (or requirements document, or what ever else you want to call it). Once that is properly done, you can be assured that the product can be designed properly and quality is then serving the customer.

    If it makes it easier, you can substitute "customer's needs and requirements" for "specifications" in my definition of quality above.

    And yet, none of this simplification of quality to conformance with requirements prevents continuous improvement to either process in the factory or performance for the customer.

    Ultimately the two different topics, internal quality and customer requirements, must become one and the same. The only way I can see doing this is to explicitly identify the expectations of the customer and put this in the specification so the product can be designed properly. I'm sure we all know of quality products that don't do what the customer wants. I'm also sure that the customer expectations were not turned into specific requirements before the product was designed. There's nothing the quality professional can do after the fact to meet the customers real requirements.

    Does the customer define quality? No. The customer defines the requirements. Quality is making sure you meet the requirements.”



  • Timothy Large, Quality Systems manager and technology commercialization manager, buyCASTINGS Inc. & FOPAT Production Inc.:

    “I think an important aspect to remember here is that without a prospective buyer and/or customer need (internal/external), the emphasis on defining quality, whether it's a product or service, cannot be established unless it is communicated through the voice of the customer (VOC) first. Quality standards, requirements, and methodologies have all derived from the "voice of the customer" over the years, regardless of what industry or business you are in.

    I believe Professor Noriaki Kano defined this best in the Kano model of customer satisfaction, which remains to be the key principle defining quality and quality management principles. Without the need to satisfy the musts, wants, and wows of the customer, quality has very little value. It is the demands on the musts, wants, and wows of the customer that has provided quality with such great impact and why it has become an important factor in our day-to-day lives as quality professionals and within our businesses, industries, and organizations in assuring that we can meet or exceed customer expectations in delivering quality products and services that we provide. So, when asked "Do you agree that quality is defined in terms of the customer?" I would have to respond with a yes!”



    Respond with your comments below, or join the discussion on Quality’s LinkedIn page.



  • subscribe to Quality Magazine

    Related Articles

    Readers Respond: "Quality Control Should Check the Process, Not the Product"

    Readers Respond: What is a Skilled Worker, Exactly?

    Readers Respond: What Quality System Software Would You Recommend if Starting a Company's Quality Manual from Scratch?

    Readers Respond: Can Six Sigma Be Adapted to Look at Innovation?

    You must login or register in order to post a comment.

    Report Abusive Comment

    Subscribe For Free!
    • Print & Digital Edition Subscriptions
    • eNewsletters
    • Online Registration
    • Subscription Customer Service
    • Mobile Help

    More Videos

    Popular Stories

    Speaking of Quality

    No More Hamburger Helper

    Lean manufacturing

    Lean In to 5S

    Quality cost chart

    Prevention is the Key to Reduced Quality Costs

    The Cost of Quality

    Understanding How Management Involvement Impacts the Risk of Quality Cost

    ASNT

    ASNT Annual Conference Brings NDT to Las Vegas

    Quality Leadership 100 Survey

    Poll

    Topics to Talk About

    What topics would you like to see Quality cover more?
    View Results Poll Archive

    Products

    Quality Brain Teasers: Real World Challenges to Build Your Manufacturing Skills (ebook)

    Quality Brain Teasers: Real World Challenges to Build Your Manufacturing Skills (ebook)

    Assessments and Training in the following areas...

    See More Products

    SoftwareDownloads

    Quality Magazine

    Quality December 2019

    2019 December

    Check out the December 2019 edition of Quality: Quality 4.0 for medical device manufacturing, automated metrology, gage trends, plastics, materials analysis and much more!
    View More Create Account
    • Resources
      • Market Research
      • Custom Content & Marketing Services
      • List Rental
      • Partners
      • Manufacturing Group
      • Polls
      • Privacy Policy
      • Survey and Sample
    • Want More
      • Connect

    Copyright ©2019. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

    Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing