Kawasaki’s 800,000-square-foot Maryville, MO, plant, opened in 1989, produces single- and twin-cylinder air-cooled or water-cooled engines, 1000 cc or smaller, for commercial and consumer lawnmower OEMs, as well as for a sister plant that manufactures ATVs and Mule utility vehicles. Operations at Maryville include aluminum die-casting, plastic injection molding, extensive amounts of machining, painting and assembly. All engines-approximately 500,000 per year-are run-off before shipping as well.
“We use the Kawasaki Production System (KPS),” says JC Watts, quality control technical group supervisor at the Maryville plant. “Our quality and engineering requirements are comparable to the best in the automotive industry, though our manufacturing is focused on lower volumes of many different kinds of products.” The plant has 50 machining lines, typically arranged in a U-cell pattern with start and end machines across from each other. “Primarily, it’s one-piece production with machining lines running a part through multiple processes at a high rate,” Watts explains. Kawasaki utilizes automation in many die cast and some machining operations, accomplished through the integration of Kawasaki robots. On one of the crankcase lines, robots load raw materials and unload finished parts that are placed into inventory for assembly to draw upon. Machined parts include aluminum, cast iron and steel.
“We’re running similar tolerances that automotive powertrain uses for high-end products, and there are probably four or five critical processes for our aluminum parts and 15 for the steel parts,” Watts adds. It is not uncommon to find tolerances “in single digits in microns” for form and 0.05 millimeter true position.
The QC lab is responsible for inspecting 125 different mass-produced parts, as well as vendor parts and those produced for engineering development. The environmentally controlled lab is located adjacent to the machining lines, and parts intended for routine inspection are delivered on carts or via train (an electric vehicle towing several trolley carts). Critical components may be hand delivered for priority inspection during a line changeover or if an operator suspects a problem.
5-Axis Scanning Advantage
Fewer Probe Configurations, More FlexibilityWith Revo, the Maryville operation now has two probe configurations that measure all of its mass production parts, reserving custom probes in a changing rack for a few special applications. Special configurations for vendor parts also have been eliminated because the infinite positioning angles of Revo allow measuring of a part without special fixturing or consideration of which probe to use. With so few probes, calibration time has dropped to around 46 minutes. Now QC technicians monitor the calibration instead of calibrating every shift.
“We are now able to measure all our mass production parts with just two probe configurations,” says Watts. “We were able to eliminate the large ball stylus configurations because of the large approach angle the Revo creates between the stylus and the work piece. During scanning the Revo maintains the approach angle which allows a large cylindrical feature such as a cylinder bore to be measured with the same stylus used for measuring a 5-millimeter bore, with no chance of shanking the stylus.”
Flexibility of the Revo system also has proven to be a time-saver for Kawasaki. “We can measure any part on either machine with a limited amount of fixturing and no special calibrations,” says Watts. “We measure all our parts on three types of fixturing. The Revo probe orients itself to the part after it’s initially aligned. The utilization of special fixtures has almost been eliminated, without concerns of measurement error due to part alignment.”
Kawasaki programs all of its inspection routines in-house using Mitutoyo’s Mcosmos 3.1 software. The upgrade to Revo instigated a shift to parametric and modular programming of inspection routines through in-house development of coding. This allows a program to be used for a part family. “We might have 30 different crankshafts, for example, but because everyone has the same features, only in a different size or location, we can use the same inspection program to measure all the parts,” Watts states. Infinite angles of the Revo system make it simple to create parametric programs because there is no concern about the stylus interfering with a part feature, due to size or orientation of the feature. The probe automatically aligns normal to the feature being measured, simplifying programming.
Faster Inspection, Better Data from QC to R&DWatts says the transition from 3-axis to 5-axis programming is not difficult, and a programmer with limited ability can still program Revo inspections as 3-axis. However, when it comes to optimizing speed of inspection, it is critical to use head motion as much as possible. “This allows you to scan parts the quickest, without inducing measurement error,” he adds. “Revo opens up a lot of possibilities, with few limitations, so speed gains are obtainable for both the higher and lower skilled programmers.”
Inspection results may be relayed to the machining lines manually or they can be accessed locally by line operators over a computer network. “Some of our inspection reports supply offsets directly back to the machining centers coordinate system; this allows the CNC [computer numerical control] operator to read the offset adjustment right off the report, allowing no misinterpretation of what offsets the operator needs to input,” Watts explains. “We take advantage of some of the best fit algorithms and work with our production engineers, especially on parts that require more complex algorithms to get the adjustment right, and to utilize multiple process adjustments simultaneously. We had limited ability to do this before the Revo; the Revo allowed us to utilize parametric programming, which in turn allowed us to expand our capability across the board more easily.”
Five-axis CMM scanning has been a game-changer for QC at the Maryville plant in terms of speed, data quality and inspection capacity, according to Watts. “We’ve enjoyed big gains from having two machines that are completely redundant, so if one machine breaks or is down for calibration, it’s no problem to measure critical parts on the other machine. That’s a big advantage in the QC lab, because we were the ones who, in a pinch, had to get the large part on the small CMM, or the part requiring the odd angle probe on the machine that didn’t have it. We use to get requests from R&D to measure certain geometries, and it was next to impossible to achieve in the time allotted. Now we can provide the data much quicker and, being scanned data, our people have greater confidence in it. This new flexibility, the reduced fixturing, form measurement, the parametric programming-these are all collateral advantages, in addition to the raw inspection speed.”
The Maryville facility has run more than 50,000 parts through the two Revo-equipped CMMs, and Watts indicates there are plans to expand the use of the Revo system to gear inspection and cam lift if it proves feasible. “We’ve developed our own algorithm and sub-routine in our software for cam lift, and that’s something that would have been more difficult to do without the Revo system due to the angle the probe requires to measure the lift on the lobes.”
BenefitsWhat would take 3 to 4 minutes to scan with an SP25 is now being measured in 10 seconds with the Revo.
The system eliminated the need for custom probe configurations.
Probe calibration times have been cut from six to seven hours to about 45 minutes.