QualityLinkedIn group members analyze the importance of this concept. Read excerpts of the discussion and post your own feedback.
Qualitycolumnist Bill Tandler analyzes the Greatest Design Tool (GD&T) ever by taking a detailed look at the structure of feature control frames.
QualityLinkedIn discussion group members offer up their own thoughts on the subject. Post your comment today or join theQualityLinkedIn Group to readthe full discussion .
Bob Matthew, principal specialist quality engineer at Boeing Co.:
“Very well explained. GD&T is the communication language of a (mechanical) design engineer and therefore the design engineer should have product knowledge and the process knowledge.”
Roy Jackson, consultant, self-employed:
“Nice to see AMSE has finally updated Y14.5...especially with the Tangent Plane modifier. Of course, that means I have to get an updated copy of Y14.5.
“As stated in the[article], too many companies use their own GD&T ‘system.’ As an SQE (and occasional source inspector), this has always been problematic. I wonder if the ISO equivalent (ISO 1100, if I recall correctly) will be updated, as well?”
Brian Chester, project general manager at Aapico Hi-Tech:
“GD&T, now there is a subject. I wonder how many people other than the design engineer understand what this is all about. I learnt GD&T as a design draftsman more years ago than I like to remember, and have kept abreast of it ever since all be it I think I may need a refresher.
“But the question I pose is: How many people outside the design office really understand what it all means? I have seen many times when an inspector or for that matter a tool maker or production engineer comes across a GD&T tolerance or reference they are lost in fully understanding what it really means.
"GD&T is used extensively throughout the auto industry but like all tools unless it is used correctly and then understood by all then it falls over.
"It is not only the design engineer that requires the knowledge but all people in the manufacturing chain, unless all understand it, it will be cast of as a symbol on a drawing that nobody understands and eventually takes little notice of thus effecting the quality of the product.
"Second question, if a GD&T tolerance is shown on the drawing what is the tool makers tolerance on the tool to comply with the requirements. It is not make the tool to meet the GD&T tolerance shown on the drawing by the way. Not from my training, anyway."
Dana Donahue, ASQ-CQE, CQA, supplier quality engineer at BSH Home Appliances:
"I wish there were more of us T-Rex's in industry, teaching and guiding the young "up and comers". I was lucky enough to have started in Mfg. in the mid 1970's, when we had lots of "old" dino's.....and if you were respectful and paid attention they would pass on their knowledge. I still can estimate the hardness of a material based on the color of the spark or use clay to get a cast of a hard to see radius in a machined casting. Hand scraping of machined surfaces using Prussian Blue and a carbide always amazed me!”
Tom Johnson, environmental health and safety director at Kirtland Products:
“While GD&T is a code, it is also appropriate to think of it as a language. That is, there may be multiple ways to specify a feature and still achieve the same result. The key factor is design intent and what the designer wanted to achieve. Designers do not always let their intent be known, trying to let the GD&T do the speaking for them. This does not always work, unfortunately.”
Readers Respond: GD&T Workshop: Decoding Feature Control Frames
June 21, 2012