search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
  • HOME
  • PROCESS CONTROL
  • QUALITY ANALYTICS
  • SIMULATION
  • IDEA MANAGEMENT & INNOVATION for OpEx
  • Quality Home
Next Generation SPC & Quality AnalyticsAutomotiveNext Gen Quality Analytics

Sponsored Content

How to Predict and Prevent Product Failure

Preventing both warranty issues and field problems due to lack of product reliability.

QM 0222 Minitab IC Topic 2 How to Predict and Prevent Product Failure feature
February 11, 2022
✕
Image in modal.

Imagine your new car breaks down after driving 60 miles. The engine light turns on and your vehicle must now be towed to be serviced. This is not only a warranty issue but also a field problem due to lack of product reliability.

Reliability is defined as the quality of a product over time and statistically speaking it is the probability of a product not to fail during a defined period of time.

Content provide by Minitab


THE RISK OF FAILURE

In cases like this one, the original equipment manufacturers (OEM) would be at fault. These OEMS must then quickly find the root cause and determine the risk for other vehicles still operating in field so they can predict how many additional vehicles will return with the same problem or continue driving with no problems at all (also called survivors). Eventually if the risk is high enough, a vehicle recall in that market could be necessary.

Once the part that has failed has been found, you would determine the outstanding risk* and begin calculating the probability for a given time period. Generally, life data (e.g. cycles, mileage, operating time) does not often fit the normal distribution, so the Weibull distribution model model is recommended to perform the reliability analysis to make predictions using Minitab Statistical Software.

To perform the reliability analysis in Minitab Statistical Software, the following data is required:

  • Failure quantity
  • Mileage at failure
  • Failure date
  • Production date of failed parts
  • Vehicle registration date
  • Volume produced during the period at stake

With the data above, we can provide the required inputs for the analysis using Minitab Statistical Software.


A CLOSER LOOK AT THE DATA

42 vehicles failed in field due to a malfunction of the fuel injection equipment. These were reported by Original Equipment Manufacturers. The number is low compared to 11.9 million parts produced because early failures, namely infant mortality, were also recorded.

Even though some parts have failed, survivors still operate in field. We need consider the quantity of survivors and their mileage to date.


RUNNING THE RELIABILITY ANALYSIS

A Parametric Distribution Analysis will help us to calculate how many vehicles are likely to fail.


QM 0222 Minitab IC Topic 2 Failure Probability Plot for Mileage km

Graph: Weibull Probability Plot (Click on the image to enlarge.)


HOW MANY VEHICLES ARE LIKELY TO FAIL?

Vehicles drive in average approximately 45000 kilometers a year. The estimated cumulative probability until 45000 kilometers and until 135000 kilometers are reported in the table displayed below.

QM 0222 Minitab IC Topic 2 Failure Table: Cumulative Failure Probabilities

Table: Cumulative Failure Probabilities (Click on the image to enlarge.)

11.9 million parts were produced. The 95% Confidence level upper bound estimates the maximum expected return failure of 0.0000037. As a consequence, out of 1 million parts we can expect 3.7 failures.

Out of 11.9 million vehicles, 44 vehicles are likely to fail:

11.9 million parts x 3.7 parts per million = 44 parts likely to fail

42 vehicles have already failed, 2 are expected as potential returns below 45000 km.

Original Equipment Manufacturers have usually signed a warranty agreement with component suppliers: parts must not fail under a set period of time.

This data-driven approach is useful .

Minitab Statistical Software offers a wide range of functionality for calculating the reliability of product, some of which were demonstrated in this example.

* Note: Risk is determined both qualitatively and quantitatively, but we have focused on the quantitative aspect only in this blog.

This article was co-written with Mr. Serhan Anac, a Certified Six Sigma Black Belt and Shainin RedX Master. Serhan Anac is a problem solving expert with 11 years of experience at Robert Bosch in Turkey.

Leading Customer Quality projects, Serhan is also involved in Research and Development, hence his interest in Reliability as well as Monte Carlo Simulation and more analytical engineering methods.

A statistics, data science and Minitab enthusiast, Serhan helps his organisation to improve processes and find solutions to daily manufacturing problems, so is happy to share his best practices to help other Quality Professionals learn and grow in their careers.


Minitab empowers all parts of an organization to predict better outcomes, design better products, and improve processes to generate higher revenues and reduce costs. Visit our website to learn more.

KEYWORDS: automotive industry data analysis Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) reliability inspection

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • 2024 Quality Rookie of the Year Justin Wise 1440x750px banner with "Quality Rookie of the Year" logo inset

    Meet the 2024 Quality Rookie of the Year: Justin Wise

    Justin Wise is an exceptional individual who has been...
    Aerospace
    By: Michelle Bangert
  • Man with umbrella and coat stands outside while it rains at night looking at a building.

    Nondestructive Testing: Is there an ethics problem?

    I was a whistleblower who exposed fraudulent activities...
    NDT
    By: Dale Norwood
  • Unraveling Deflategate: Football stadium with closeup of football on field

    Unraveling the Tom Brady Deflategate

    The Deflategate scandal erupted following the 2014 AFC...
    Measurement
    By: Greg Cenker and Henry Zumbrun

Running a Monte Carlo Simulation in Minitab

Monte Carlo simulations help forecast possible outcomes and probabilities, while saving on time and resources spent running physical tests. Learn how easy it is to run a Monte Carlo simulation with Minitab.

MiniTab Whitepaper download

×

Stay in the know with Quality’s comprehensive coverage of
the manufacturing and metrology industries.

Newsletters | Website | eMagazine

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Manufacturing Division
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • Newsletters
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Market Research
    • Reprints
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2026. All Rights Reserved BNP Media, Inc. and BNP Media II, LLC.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing