Industry Headlines

Where Has Quality Gone?

Are auto part makers sacrificing quality to meet the stringent demands from automakers to lower component prices? The resounding answer seems to be yes.

According to John Henke, president of Planning Perspectives (Birmingham, MI), the automotive research firm that conducted the survey, "Suppliers are saying, 'We're not going to give them more quality if we're not going to be paid for it.'"

The survey of 261 suppliers suggests automakers are pushing suppliers for price cuts as the softening economy and stronger competition chip away at profits. Suppliers for Chrysler were hit hard when the company imposed an across-the-board 5% price cut in January, and the automaker wants to lower parts costs an additional 10% by 2003.

But Chrysler is not alone. Suppliers report that every OEM has demanded price reductions that can vary by 50% or more across commodity areas. For example, one OEM required an average price reduction in a commodity area of 3% while another wanted a 7.8% reduction. "This suggests that either there is either a complete lack of cohesive pricing strategy within the OEM, or that each OEM has implemented a rather sophisticated commodity pricing strategy. However, further investigation found the latter is not the case," says Henke.

The study reveals that suppliers are responding differently to the price reduction demands of the manufacturer, depending on how much they give back to the OEM and the opportunity to make an acceptable return on the manufacturer's business. Many suppliers who gave higher price reductions or who felt they had a lower opportunity for making an acceptable return on the manufacturer's business, say they are maintaining or lowering the quality of their products to achieve mandated cost reductions.

Neil DeKoker, managing director of the Original Equipment Suppliers Association, says the report reflects the struggle suppliers face to remain competitive and profitable. "It isn't that suppliers are saying, 'We're not going to give you quality,'" he says. "Quality is a given to stay in business, but if you can provide a satisfaction level to meet minimum requirements, as opposed to doing the ultimate, chances are you're going to do just what you need to get by."

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to Quality Magazine. 

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Multimedia

Videos

Podcasts

Bill Arbogast explains his perspective on quality, ISO 9001, and how to manage inevitable business changes.


Read: The 2013 Quality Professional of the Year

 
More Podcasts

THE MAGAZINE

Quality Magazine

magazine quality cover 2013 may audits

2013 May

Check out the May 2013 edition of Quality Magazine for features about Measurement, Software and Test & Inspection.
Table Of Contents Subscribe

Plant of the Year

Which is the most important factor in considering a Quality plant of the Year?
View Results Poll Archive

THE QUALITY MAGAZINE STORE

M:\General Shared\__AEC Store Katie Z\AEC Store\Images\Quality\prac-field-guide-for-iso.gif
A Practical Field Guide for ISO 9001:2008

The purpose of this field guide is to assist organizations, step by step, in implementing a quality management system (QMS) in conformance with ISO 9001:2008, whether from scratch or by transitioning from ISO 9001:2000. It examines each sub-clause of Sections 4–8 of ISO 9001:2008, which contain the requirements, and gives a list of the documentation/documents required, internal audit questions, a summary of management’s responsibilities, and a flowchart of the steps that need to be undertaken to satisfy the requirements.

More Products

Clear Seas Research

qcast_ClearSeas_logo.gifWith access to over one million professionals and more than 60 industry-specific publications,Clear Seas Research offers relevant insights from those who know your industry best. Let us customize a market research solution that exceeds your marketing goals.

eNewsletters

STAY CONNECTED

facebook_40.png twitter_40px.png  youtube_40px.pnglinkedin_40px.png