Industry Headlines

Where Has Quality Gone?

May 19, 2003
/ Print / Reprints /
/ Text Size+
Are auto part makers sacrificing quality to meet the stringent demands from automakers to lower component prices? The resounding answer seems to be yes.

According to John Henke, president of Planning Perspectives (Birmingham, MI), the automotive research firm that conducted the survey, "Suppliers are saying, 'We're not going to give them more quality if we're not going to be paid for it.'"

The survey of 261 suppliers suggests automakers are pushing suppliers for price cuts as the softening economy and stronger competition chip away at profits. Suppliers for Chrysler were hit hard when the company imposed an across-the-board 5% price cut in January, and the automaker wants to lower parts costs an additional 10% by 2003.

But Chrysler is not alone. Suppliers report that every OEM has demanded price reductions that can vary by 50% or more across commodity areas. For example, one OEM required an average price reduction in a commodity area of 3% while another wanted a 7.8% reduction. "This suggests that either there is either a complete lack of cohesive pricing strategy within the OEM, or that each OEM has implemented a rather sophisticated commodity pricing strategy. However, further investigation found the latter is not the case," says Henke.

The study reveals that suppliers are responding differently to the price reduction demands of the manufacturer, depending on how much they give back to the OEM and the opportunity to make an acceptable return on the manufacturer's business. Many suppliers who gave higher price reductions or who felt they had a lower opportunity for making an acceptable return on the manufacturer's business, say they are maintaining or lowering the quality of their products to achieve mandated cost reductions.

Neil DeKoker, managing director of the Original Equipment Suppliers Association, says the report reflects the struggle suppliers face to remain competitive and profitable. "It isn't that suppliers are saying, 'We're not going to give you quality,'" he says. "Quality is a given to stay in business, but if you can provide a satisfaction level to meet minimum requirements, as opposed to doing the ultimate, chances are you're going to do just what you need to get by."

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to Quality Magazine. 

You must login or register in order to post a comment.




Charles J. Hellier has been active in the technology of nondestructive testing and related quality and inspection fields since 1957. Here he talks with Quality's managing editor, Michelle Bangert, about the importance of training.
More Podcasts

Quality Magazine


2015 January

Check out the January 2015 edition of Quality Magazine for features!

Table Of Contents Subscribe

The Skills Gap

What is the key to solving the so-called skills gap in the quality industry?
View Results Poll Archive

Clear Seas Research

qcast_ClearSeas_logo.gifWith access to over one million professionals and more than 60 industry-specific publications,Clear Seas Research offers relevant insights from those who know your industry best. Let us customize a market research solution that exceeds your marketing goals.


facebook_40.png twitter_40px.png  youtube_40px.pnglinkedin_40px.png