Quality Magazine
  Home
  Subscribe
  Subscribe to eNewsletter
  Subscription Customer Service
  Online
  Industry Headlines
  eXtras
  Blogs
  Quality Product Spotlights
  White Papers on the Web
  Tech ManufactureXPO
  Quality Downloads
  Webinars
  Quality Showcases
  e-Inserts Plus
  Online Store
  More Product Info
  Archive
  Q-Tube
  Q-Cast Podcasts
  Quality Showrooms
  Brain Teasers
  Current Issue
  Coming Events
  Features
  Departments
  Columns
  Products
  Quality Quick Clicks
  Special Sections
  NDT
  Vision & Sensors
  Aerospace
  How To Guide
  China Editions
  Quality Guides
  Quality Buyers Guide
  Software Selector
  Registrars Guide
  Services Guide
  Quality Services
  Job Marketplace
  Industry Links
  Classifieds
  Career Center
  Events
  Quality Expo 2012
  IMTS 2012
  Meetings and Shows
  Industry Webinars
  Quality Awards
  2012 Quality Plant of the Year Nomination Form
  2012 Quality Professional of the Year Nomination Form
  Quality Leadership 100
  Quality Info
  Media Planning Guide
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Other Dimensions: Standard or Special?
by Hill Cox
February 25, 2010

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare

Editor’s note: This is the first part of a two-part series.


It comes up a lot. The method used to measure the parts is not good enough using standard instruments so the manufacturer looks for something “better.” Wading through catalogs, while interesting, is usually not going to help much because there often is more to solving measuring problems than changing the hardware involved.

From a cost-saving point of view—the only way some people look at these things—the choices from the lowest to the highest cost are a standard gage or instrument, a modified version of the standard item, or an out-and-out specially made gage or instrument.

If it appears a special instrument is in your future, this column will attempt to answer key questions to meet your needs. To do this, I’ll fall back on some basic questions: Why? What? Who? When? Where?

Accurate answers to these questions will put you on the home stretch to finding a better way—or the realization that there may not be a better way than what you’re already doing. So let’s get started.

Why?

Why are you on this quest in the first place? Is it speed or accuracy that needs fine tuning? Frame your subsequent questions around the answer. Keep in mind that higher speed may mean lower accuracy, depending on the measuring system selected for use with a specially built gaging fixture.

What?

What is it that you are actually trying to measure or check? What is the tolerance on that feature? Are there geometrical characteristics such as taper and squareness that must be determined?

What are you using now? The answer to this one question may be all that your gagemaker needs to know to put you on the right track.

What type of answers do you need? Actual values or yes/no answers? Too often the answer given for this question is: “Quote me both ways.” This is not good. Yes or no answers usually mean fixed-limit gages or fixtures. So if you need numbers, there is no sense even considering fixed-limit equipment even though they may be cheaper. A hybrid fixture may be a practical compromise.

What sort of budget do you have in mind? Suppliers need to know this, particularly if a specially made item may be involved because customers may have unrealistic expectations from a financial point of view. If you don’t have a budget number, ask your supplier for an estimated range before everyone invests a lot of time.

What type of data processing do you need from the equipment or does it have to link up with existing systems?

What is the production rate in pieces per minute?

What is the required inspection rate? 100%? Every other piece?

What gage repeatability and reproducibility (GR&R) do you expect from the process? Did you just say 10% because it is everyone’s goal or do you know it is achievable—all factors considered?

What will be the acceptance criteria—gage accuracy or GR&R numbers? Most suppliers can estimate a GR&R range, but guaranteeing it is another story since so many variables outside of the gagemaker’s control can influence the results.

What type of master is preferred for setting up gaging fixtures? Super accurate ones where every feature has near-zero errors, or less costly models with offsets?

Who?

Who is the go-to person with authority regarding changes to technical requirements and design? Will the supplier have to go through a buyer for technical information?

Who is going to be using this gage, instrument or fixture? Neanderthals, apes, unskilled humans, semi-skilled or skilled people are all types we have been asked to design gages for. Skill level of the equipment operator can be a deciding factor on design and performance.

Who is responsible for carrying out GR&R tests if they are required?


Hill Cox
Hill Cox is president of the American Measuring Tool Manufacturers Association and president of Frank J. Cox Sales Ltd. He can be reached at CoxH@bnp.com.

|PrintEmail

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.




























Most Emailed Articles

  1. Management: A Closer Look: Understanding Risk Management for Medical Device Manufacturers
  2. Other Dimensions: Does New Stuff Have to be Calibrated?
  3. Auto Industry Goes on U.S. Hiring Binge
  4. Jim’s Gems: Don’t Focus on What Seems Unfair
  5. GD&T Workshop: A Top Down View
  6. Understanding ISO 13485
  7. Test & Inspection: Sensing the Thread
  8. Software & Analysis: FMEAs for the Medical Industry: Which FMEA Type Should I Use?
  9. Shifting the Paradigm: Business System Analyses for Identifying Areas to Improve
  10. ISO 13485: Medical Devices and Risk Management
Top Searches
  1. Quality 101
  2. Quality Management Systems
  3. quality assurance
  4. quality inspector
  5. quality performance indicators
  6. LEAN Quality Management Systems
  7. surface finish
  8. root cause
  9. variation management
  10. optical inspection
 
Most Popular Articles
  1. Other Dimensions: Does New Stuff Have to be Calibrated? 01/31/2012
  2. Quality 101: Nondestructive Testing 02/22/2008
  3. Quality 101: An Introduction to Gage R&R 12/01/2005
  4. Understanding ISO 13485 01/02/2008
  5. 50 Years of Quality--Take Another Look at Nondestructive Testing 10/23/2011
  6. Measurement: The Democratization of Measurement 01/27/2012
  7. Aerospace Industry To Face Challenges in 2012 02/07/2012
  8. Quality Measurement: Effects of Screw-Thread Geometry 10/01/2005
  9. U.S. Manufacturing Making a Comeback 02/01/2012
  10. Quality 101: Surface Finish Measurement Basics 09/01/2004
© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy