Quality Magazine
  Home
  Subscribe
  Subscribe to eNewsletter
  Subscription Customer Service
  Online
  Industry Headlines
  eXtras
  Blogs
  Quality Product Spotlights
  White Papers on the Web
  Tech ManufactureXPO
  Quality Downloads
  Webinars
  Quality Showcases
  e-Inserts Plus
  Online Store
  More Product Info
  Archive
  Q-Tube
  Q-Cast Podcasts
  Quality Showrooms
  Brain Teasers
  Current Issue
  Coming Events
  Features
  Departments
  Columns
  Products
  Quality Quick Clicks
  Special Sections
  NDT
  Vision & Sensors
  Aerospace
  How To Guide
  China Editions
  Quality Guides
  Quality Buyers Guide
  Software Selector
  Registrars Guide
  Services Guide
  Quality Services
  Job Marketplace
  Industry Links
  Classifieds
  Career Center
  Events
  Quality Expo 2012
  IMTS 2012
  Meetings and Shows
  Industry Webinars
  Quality Awards
  2012 Quality Plant of the Year Nomination Form
  2012 Quality Professional of the Year Nomination Form
  Quality Leadership 100
  Quality Info
  Media Planning Guide
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Quality Remix: VOC and VOP Loops Explained
by Evan Miller
March 8, 2010

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



In a recent post I described the difference between the Voice of the Customer (VOC) and the Voice of the Process (VOP). I used a simple Input => Process => Output diagram to explain that both the VOC and VOP have an important role in evaluating our systems and processes.


Input Output Process Diagram


I said that it isn’t a case of one being right and the other wrong, or one being better or worse than the other. Both approaches have their place. But they are different.

It seems to me that the biggest issue comes when we confuse the two approaches.

I suspect someone is confusing the two approaches when they point to a control chart with subgrouped data plotted on it and say something like:

“When I see a point out near our control limits, then I know we’re getting close to going out of spec.”

On the surface this seems like a reasonable thing to say. And it must be reasonable because I hear it so often. So why do I get all worked up when I hear it?

“When I see a point out near our limits…”

The issue is that the point is the average of the data in a subgroup.

Let's look at a picture:


Run Chart 1


We’re looking at three subgroups of data.

What is your vote?

Specs are 25 plus or minus 5, we have no problem, right?

Specs are 25 plus or minus 1, we should worry, right?

The best answer? You don’t know.

You don’t know because these are plots of averages. (Of course if we had a range chart with this we’d know more, but we don’t. I left it out because the people who say “When I see a point out near the limits…” seem to ignore the range chart.)

Here is the actual data:

Sample A:
· Piece 1 = 24.9
· Piece 2 = 25.0
· Piece 3 = 25.1

Sample B:
· Piece 1 = 20.0
· Piece 2 = 25.0
· Piece 3 = 30.0

Sample C:
· Piece 1 = 20.0
· Piece 2 = 20.5
· Piece 3 = 33.0

And here is what it looks like plotted on the same run chart:


Run Chart 2


Plotting subgroup averages on an X-Bar chart and then comparing those average points against the specifications is misleading. You’re blurring the use of VOC and the VOP. Don’t stop using either loop - but don’t try to use them at the same time.

Have you ever seen the VOC and VOP loops confused? What issues has it raised for you?


Evan Miller
Evan Miller joined Hertzler Systems Inc. (Goshen, IN) in 1984. For the next seven years he held positions within the company in sales, marketing, technical support and training. In 1991 when founder Paul Hertzler retired from the firm, Miller became president and is now co-owner of the company.

|PrintEmail
  Comments (0)Post a Comment
 

No HTML or BBCode in comments please.
 


Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.




























Most Emailed Articles

  1. Management: A Closer Look: Understanding Risk Management for Medical Device Manufacturers
  2. Other Dimensions: Does New Stuff Have to be Calibrated?
  3. Auto Industry Goes on U.S. Hiring Binge
  4. Jim’s Gems: Don’t Focus on What Seems Unfair
  5. GD&T Workshop: A Top Down View
  6. Understanding ISO 13485
  7. Test & Inspection: Sensing the Thread
  8. Software & Analysis: FMEAs for the Medical Industry: Which FMEA Type Should I Use?
  9. Shifting the Paradigm: Business System Analyses for Identifying Areas to Improve
  10. ISO 13485: Medical Devices and Risk Management
Top Searches
  1. Quality 101
  2. Quality Management Systems
  3. quality assurance
  4. quality inspector
  5. quality performance indicators
  6. LEAN Quality Management Systems
  7. surface finish
  8. root cause
  9. variation management
  10. optical inspection
 
Most Popular Articles
  1. Other Dimensions: Does New Stuff Have to be Calibrated? 01/31/2012
  2. Quality 101: Nondestructive Testing 02/22/2008
  3. Quality 101: An Introduction to Gage R&R 12/01/2005
  4. Understanding ISO 13485 01/02/2008
  5. 50 Years of Quality--Take Another Look at Nondestructive Testing 10/23/2011
  6. Measurement: The Democratization of Measurement 01/27/2012
  7. Aerospace Industry To Face Challenges in 2012 02/07/2012
  8. Quality Measurement: Effects of Screw-Thread Geometry 10/01/2005
  9. U.S. Manufacturing Making a Comeback 02/01/2012
  10. Quality 101: Surface Finish Measurement Basics 09/01/2004
© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy