This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn MoreThis website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
In the February 2006 issue, the photo published in "Developing a Formal Calibration Plan," (page 22) was inaccurate. At right is the correct photo of Quality Calibration Service Inc.'s calibration lab.
In the same issue in "Mark Quality Equals Part Quality," a sentence on page 37 should have read: "For example, to meet the objectives of the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) Unique Identification (UID) Program initiative, suppliers are now required by contract to mark and verify DPM codes on items having an acquisition cost of more than $5,000, serialized items, mission-critical items, and spared or repaired items that meet Item Unique Identification (IUID) requirements."
Share This Story
You must login or register in order to post a comment.
Report Abusive Comment
×
Get our new eMagazine delivered to your inbox every month.
Stay in the know with Quality’s comprehensive coverage of the manufacturing and metrology industries.
Report Abusive Comment