NIST Develops New Approach to Surface Profiling
Surface roughness is a key issue for auto manufacturers and other industries that use sheet metal, one that goes far beyond simple cosmetics. Faint striations and other marks that appear when metal is shaped can indicate residual stresses that can cause the part to fail later on. They also lead to extra wear and early retirement for the expensive stamping dies used to form sheet metal into fenders and other body parts-a typical production die can cost $2 million or more. And measures of surface roughness feed into models that predict friction and the metal’s springback-the amount it will unbend after being stamped. Springback has to be known and controlled to build accurate dies for complex metal shapes. A significant cost in introducing new lightweight alloys for cars is the trial-and-error process needed to develop a new set of dies for each new alloy.
Conventionally, roughness is measured with a profilometer, an instrument with a probe similar to a phonograph needle that is tracked in a line across the test surface to record the peaks and valleys. The process is repeated several times at intervals across the test surface, and the results are averaged into a roughness figure. But NIST researchers have found that these measures may be misleading-as both measurement uncertainties and statistical errors are compounded when the 2-D lines are extrapolated to the entire surface.
NIST’s approach uses data from a scanning laser confocal microscope (SLCM), an instrument that builds a point-by-point image of a surface in three dimensions. The data from a single SLCM image-representing an area of about 1,000 by 800 micrometers by 20 micrometers in depth-are analyzed using mathematical techniques that treat every point in the image simultaneously to produce a roughness measure that effectively considers the entire 3-D surface rather than a collection of 2-D stripes.
One early finding is that the generally accepted linear relationship between surface roughness and material deformation is incorrect, at least for the aluminum alloy the group studied. The more accurate data from the 3-D analysis shows that a more complicated relationship was masked by the large uncertainties of the linear profilometers. The NIST researchers hope their new technique will lead to more accurate models of the effects of strain on new alloys and, eventually, lower development and tooling costs for metalworking industries.