This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies
By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn More
This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
Quality Magazine logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Quality Magazine logo
  • Home
  • The Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Digital Edition
    • Archives
    • How To Guide
    • Industry News
    • Subscribe
  • Web Exclusives
    • Blogs
    • NDT Exclusives
    • Quality Exclusives
    • Vision & Sensors
  • New Products
  • Channels
    • Management
    • Measurement
    • NDT
    • Quality 101
    • Software
    • Test & Inspection
    • Vision & Sensors
  • Markets
    • Aerospace
    • Automotive
    • Electronics
    • Energy
    • Green Manufacturing
    • Medical
    • Plastics
  • More
    • Leadership 100 Survey
    • Plant of the Year
    • Professional of the Year
    • Job Board
    • White Papers
    • Quality Store
    • Software Downloads
    • eCards
    • Product Spotlights
    • Industry Links
    • Sponsor Insights
    • Market Research
  • Multimedia
    • eNewsletter
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Showcases
    • Image Galleries
    • Interactive Spotlights
  • Events
    • IMTS
    • Event Calendar
    • Quality Show
  • InfoCenters
    • Manage Quality, Risk & Compliance
    • Material Science Quality within Microscopy
    • Modern Quality Control with SPC
    • Process Control in Manufacturing
  • Directories
    • Buyers Guide
    • NDT Sourcebook
    • Take a Tour
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
Home » Registrars and ISO 9000 Credibility

Registrars and ISO 9000 Credibility

May 9, 2003
Reprints
No Comments

Are issues with registrars causing a credibility problem with ISO 9000? I received many e-mails from ISO 9000 advocates suggesting this.

What generated these often heated e-mails was my October column, "ISO 9000: More Hindrance than Help," pg. 64. I discussed several problems that I saw with the standard, but I did not discuss registrars. Many of the e-mails that strongly supported ISO 9000 also acknowledged that there are problems with it. The most common problem ISO supporters suggested was ineffective registrars that pass companies not meeting the standard¿s requirements. One reader¿s e-mail said he was astounded and embarrassed to see his company pass its initial ISO audit as he watched the auditor congratulate them on the great processes in place. Prior to the audit, the reader thought that there was absolutely no way the company could pass.

While auditing potential suppliers, I too was shocked to learn that some of them were ISO 9000 registered with a "prestigious" registrar, despite elements of a quality system that were weak or almost nonexistent. Stories of ISO 9000 registered companies with extraordinarily poor quality seem to be commonplace.

Many reader¿s fault registrars for issuing certificates to undeserving companies and thus degrading the value of their own ISO registration, which they say was used to upgrade and validate an already good quality system.



Not good enough

Another thread that ran through many e-mail responses was that ISO 9000 does not guarantee good quality. You know what? It should. Why bother if it doesn’t? Many people feel that the root problem resides with registrars that don’t guarantee compliance; not with a standard that does not guarantee quality.

I tried to collect data on this issue from the ISO Web site, but the results were inconclusive. In 2000, the latest data available on the site, there were 35,018 ISO 9000 certificates in the United States, and during that year, only 17 or 0.049% were withdrawn for failing a recertification audit.

At face value, this is alarming, but this data is clouded by the category, "Organization Discontinued Because: Other Reasons/Reason Unknown" that accounts for another 6.4% of U.S. certificates. I don’t think it is clear how many U.S. companies had their certificates pulled in 2000, but many quality professionals, including strong ISO advocates, think it is not enough.

Registrars might be holding back because they are in a classic Catch-22 business. The willingness to pull a certificate is fundamental to their service, but it is countered by the need to maintain happy customers, a healthy business and their own job. Another Catch-22 is that for the many companies that just want the certificate, an "easy" auditor is more likely to benefit than an auditor doing a good job. Registrars doing the most damage to the reputation of ISO 9000 are in the greatest position to prosper in the sea of companies that just want the certificate to meet a customer requirement. Just a few of these undeserved registrations tarnish ISO’s reputation for all manufacturers.

The fact that registrars are in a competitive business, unlike other auditors such as Underwriters Laboratory (UL) or the FDA, makes it worse. The UL auditor who does quarterly surprise audits on my plant is not in a competitive business and is willing to pull my UL mark.

Even if this issue with registrars is addressed, I’m still not a big ISO supporter. I’m passionate about using quality as a major strategic tool and differentiator to fuel business success, but to my mind the ISO bar just isn’t high enough to justify the time it takes to become certified.

With that said, though, if people are going to use ISO 9000 as a measurement of the quality management system, then the measurement should be valid. I don’t like ISO’s pass/fail measurement, but if that is the way it works, then companies that don’t meet the standard should fail. I’ve yet to meet a quality professional that feels that this is working well.

Put simply, the Registrar Accreditation Board and registrars need to change and start pulling certificates from organizations that do not meet stringent requirements. Registrars also need to better develop well-trained auditors that do fair, consistent and thorough beyond-the-paperwork audits. Until then, the ISO certificate, by itself, will continue to be somewhat meaningless to customers in the United States. That’s a shame because ISO compliance re-quires so much work from the people that comply.

subscribe to Quality Magazine

Related Articles

ISO 9000 for a Small Planet

ISO 9000 Suits Our Needs

Eliminate ISO 9000?

Probing the Limits: Readers Question ASQ's Credibility

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Report Abusive Comment

Subscribe For Free!
  • Print & Digital Edition Subscriptions
  • eNewsletters
  • Online Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service
  • Mobile Help

More Videos

Popular Stories

Lean manufacturing

Lean In to 5S

Automation in manufacturing

Automated Metrology: Manufacturing Trend of the Future

RoyalPower

Royal Power Solutions Opens Innovation Center

ASNT

ASNT Annual Conference Brings NDT to Las Vegas

EdmundsED

Edmund Optics Announces 2019 Educational Award, Norman Edmund Award Recipients

Quality Leadership 100 Survey

Poll

Topics to Talk About

What topics would you like to see Quality cover more?
View Results Poll Archive

Products

Quality Brain Teasers: Real World Challenges to Build Your Manufacturing Skills (ebook)

Quality Brain Teasers: Real World Challenges to Build Your Manufacturing Skills (ebook)

Assessments and Training in the following areas...

See More Products

SoftwareDownloads

Quality Magazine

Quality December 2019

2019 December

Check out the December 2019 edition of Quality: Quality 4.0 for medical device manufacturing, automated metrology, gage trends, plastics, materials analysis and much more!
View More Create Account
  • Resources
    • Market Research
    • Custom Content & Marketing Services
    • List Rental
    • Partners
    • Manufacturing Group
    • Polls
    • Privacy Policy
    • Survey and Sample
  • Want More
    • Connect

Copyright ©2019. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing