I often take shots at those companies with great quality systems that get their calibration reports, scan them for red flags and then file them away if none are present. They rarely get into the details on those reports until something goes wrong and they start looking for answers in reports that may be out of date. Those simple yes/no answers they insisted be put on the reports won’t help if they don’t know the meaning behind what they’re reading.
To be fair, some of the verbiage on calibration reports can leave anyone guessing so I thought it might be helpful to those who actually read these reports to understand the meaning and/or implications of the terms used for dimensional calibration work.