Quality Magazine
  Home
  Subscribe
  Subscribe to eNewsletter
  Subscription Customer Service
  Online
  Industry Headlines
  eXtras
  Blogs
  Quality Product Spotlights
  White Papers on the Web
  Tech ManufactureXPO
  Quality Downloads
  Webinars
  Quality Showcases
  e-Inserts Plus
  Online Store
  More Product Info
  Archive
  Q-Tube
  Q-Cast Podcasts
  Quality Showrooms
  Brain Teasers
  Current Issue
  Coming Events
  Features
  Departments
  Columns
  Products
  Quality Quick Clicks
  Special Sections
  NDT
  Vision & Sensors
  Aerospace
  How To Guide
  China Editions
  Quality Guides
  Quality Buyers Guide
  Software Selector
  Registrars Guide
  Services Guide
  Quality Services
  Job Marketplace
  Industry Links
  Classifieds
  Career Center
  Events
  Quality Expo 2012
  IMTS 2012
  Meetings and Shows
  Industry Webinars
  Quality Awards
  2012 Quality Plant of the Year Nomination Form
  2012 Quality Professional of the Year Nomination Form
  Quality Leadership 100
  Quality Info
  Media Planning Guide
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Study Finds Threats to U.S. Manufacturing

June 15, 2009

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



WASHINGTON, D.C.—A national study by the American Small Manufacturers Coalition (ASMC) has identified threats to the ability of U.S. manufacturers to compete and win in a fast-changing 21st century global economy.

More than 2,500 manufacturing firms across the nation participated in the Next Generation Manufacturing Study, a research effort coordinated by ASMC and member Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) centers. The study is the first step in a long-term effort to help U.S. manufacturers survive the recession and renew America’s manufacturing leadership over the next decade.

Next Generation Manufacturing refers to a framework of six strategies essential for global competitiveness today and in the future. The strategies are customer-focused innovation, systemic continuous improvement, advanced talent management, global engagement, extended enterprise management and sustainable products and processes. The study included a 61-question Web-based survey that asked manufacturers to rank their progress in these areas.

“The results are a wakeup call,” says Michael Klonsinski, ASMC board chair and executive director of the Wisconsin MEP. “The consequences of inaction could trigger even more job losses in manufacturing and ultimately a lower standard of living for all Americans.”

Among the key findings:

  • A serious gap exists between the strategies U.S. manufacturers believe are critical to their future success and their actual progress in implementing those strategies. More than a quarter of American manufacturers—representing more than 90,000 firms—are at risk because they are not at or near world-class performance levels in any of the next generation strategies.

  • Small and midsize manufacturers are less likely than larger firms to be at or near world-class status in each of the next generation strategies. One third of respondents with less than $10 million in annual revenue are not at or near world-class in any strategy, in contrast to 14% of respondents with more than $100 million in revenue. In a country where 282,000 small and midsize firms comprise the backbone of the industry, this is a significant threat to U.S. competitiveness and the viability of these companies.

  • Green/sustainability ranks low among the strategic priorities of U.S. manufacturers despite increasing government regulation, growing consumer demand and new requirements from large manufacturers in their supply chains. Only 16% of respondents rank green/sustainability as highly important to their success over the next five years. Another 16% said it was not important.

  • Only 28% of respondents believe global engagement is highly important despite a near-term future in which markets, talent, competitors and partner opportunities are growing faster outside the U.S. than within its borders.

  • Leadership loss represents a significant threat—or opportunity. One quarter of respondents say a planned leadership succession will occur within the next five years—potentially impacting 80,000 U.S. manufacturing firms. Another 29% think a succession may occur. This transition represents an opportunity to inject new ideas, energy and skill sets into these firms but also represents a significant risk where a succession plan is not in place.

  • Measurement systems are inadequately deployed. Even in one of the most fundamental and easiest-to-measure areas—process improvement—46% of the respondents had no or only ad hoc measurement systems.

  • Effective partnerships with employees, suppliers and regional support organizations are the exception rather than the norm. For example, the majority of respondents engage less than half of their employees in improvement initiatives, falling short of industry best practices that require companywide participation.

    Challenges Real, Not Insurmountable

    Manufacturing employs 13 million Americans and drives job growth in supporting industries such as logistics, marketing, transportation and business services. Manufactured goods represent two-thirds of U.S. exports and drive more net wealth creation than any other sector. Yet even before the recession, the nation’s manufacturers were facing intense international competition and a host of other challenges.

    “The solution is not to shift away from manufacturing, but to transform our manufacturing base into a faster, more flexible industry capable of capturing global market share,” says Klonsinski. “The good news is that many manufacturers are already adopting next generation strategies and becoming stronger, more profitable firms as a result. The challenges we’re facing are real but not insurmountable.”

    Business leaders, manufacturers and industry thought leaders say Next Generation Manufacturing represents a way forward for U.S. manufacturers.

    “Manufacturers that focus on achieving world-class status in Next Generation Manufacturing strategies are leaving their competitors behind,” says John Brandt, chief executive officer of the Ohio-based Manufacturing Performance Institute (MPI), a global research firm that conducted the study. “They manage differently, implement best practices at far higher rates and outperform their non-world-class peers on a wide array of operational and financial metrics.”

    For more information, visit www.smallmanufacturers.org.


  • |PrintEmail

    Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.




























    Most Emailed Articles

    1. Management: A Closer Look: Understanding Risk Management for Medical Device Manufacturers
    2. Other Dimensions: Does New Stuff Have to be Calibrated?
    3. Auto Industry Goes on U.S. Hiring Binge
    4. Jim’s Gems: Don’t Focus on What Seems Unfair
    5. GD&T Workshop: A Top Down View
    6. Understanding ISO 13485
    7. Test & Inspection: Sensing the Thread
    8. Software & Analysis: FMEAs for the Medical Industry: Which FMEA Type Should I Use?
    9. Shifting the Paradigm: Business System Analyses for Identifying Areas to Improve
    10. ISO 13485: Medical Devices and Risk Management
    Top Searches
    1. Quality 101
    2. Quality Management Systems
    3. quality assurance
    4. quality inspector
    5. quality performance indicators
    6. LEAN Quality Management Systems
    7. surface finish
    8. root cause
    9. variation management
    10. optical inspection
     
    Most Popular Articles
    1. Other Dimensions: Does New Stuff Have to be Calibrated? 01/31/2012
    2. Quality 101: Nondestructive Testing 02/22/2008
    3. Quality 101: An Introduction to Gage R&R 12/01/2005
    4. Understanding ISO 13485 01/02/2008
    5. 50 Years of Quality--Take Another Look at Nondestructive Testing 10/23/2011
    6. Measurement: The Democratization of Measurement 01/27/2012
    7. Aerospace Industry To Face Challenges in 2012 02/07/2012
    8. Quality Measurement: Effects of Screw-Thread Geometry 10/01/2005
    9. U.S. Manufacturing Making a Comeback 02/01/2012
    10. Quality 101: Surface Finish Measurement Basics 09/01/2004
    © 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy