Quality Magazine
  Home
  Subscribe
  eNewsletter
  Online
  Industry Headlines
  Web Exclusives
  Quality Product Spotlights
  White Papers on the Web
  Quality Downloads
  Classifieds
  Industry Links
  E-Cards Plus
  Online Store
  More Product Info
  Archive
  Current Issue
  Coming Events
  Features
  Departments
  Columns
  Brain Teasers
  Products
  Quality Quick Clicks
  Special Sections
  NDT
  Vision & Sensors
  Aerospace
  How To Guide
  China Editions
  Quality Guides
  Quality Buyers Guide
  Software Selector
  Registrars Guide
  Services Guide
  Events
  Quality Measurement Conference
  Quality NDT Conference
  Quality Expo Detroit
  IMTS 2008
  Quality Awards
  2009 Quality Plant of the Year
  2009 Quality Professional of the Year
  Quality Leadership 100
  Quality Info
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Email this Article Print View
The Impact of the Audit Score
by Roger Ritterbeck
July 16, 2007

The audit score is one significant advantage that is often overlooked in AS 9100 registration. By Roger Ritterbeck


From the pursuit of AS 9100 registration to lean manufacturing, companies are continually looking for the edge that will distinguish them from the competition. For AS 9100 registration, one significant advantage that is often overlooked is the audit score.

International certification guidelines require that AS 9100 audits be scored. This score is posted in the Online Aerospace Supplier Information System (OASIS), which is used by the aerospace community, particularly OEMs, to monitor supply chain audit performance. Many OEMs have minimum thresholds in terms of AS 9100 audit scores, and will look closely at a company’s score to help assess its quality management system and ability to provide premiere products or services. The scores can be used to determine whether OEMs conduct on-site supplier assessments, or even whether contracts are awarded at all.

Organizations pursuing AS 9100 registration can increase their probability of a positive audit score by learning the factors that significantly impact it. For each AS 9100 audit there is a total score to be achieved, which is based on applicable clauses of the standard. For instance, total possible scores would be different for organizations that are responsible for design vs. those that are not.

For any nonconformances (NCRs) that are found during an audit, points are deducted from the total possible score. Key requirements, which are clauses of the AS 9100 standard that have been identified to be most critical, carry a greater point value. Thus, by paying careful attention to key requirements, an organization can receive a higher audit score by ensuring there are no NCRs in these critical areas.


Enlarge this picture
Table 1 shows a requirement that includes five sub-clauses. Since the M is at the top of the clause, all five sub-clauses are considered key.
So how does one know which clauses have been identified as key requirements? In the AS 9100 checklist, AS 9101, there is a column identified as key requirements, which showcases two designations for key requirements. Product-related key requirements are those that could have a direct impact on product conformity. These are identified with a P. Management-related key requirements are those portions of the system that industry has determined need additional management focus and resources in order to meet the expectations of an aerospace quality management system. Management-related key requirements are identified with an M.

For sections of the standard where there are multiple sub-clauses, it also is important to distinguish where key requirements are identified in the clause. Where the key requirement designation is at the very top of the clause, any sub-clause below would be considered key and would result in a significant reduction in the audit score if NCRs were found here.


Enlarge this picture
Table 2 shows an example where there are two product-related key requirements in lower sub-clause; in this example, only sub-clause g) and h) would have a higher impact on the audit’s total score.
In other sections with multiple sub-clauses, key requirements may be identified only with certain sub-clauses. In this case only those sub-clauses with the designation would have a higher score impact.

Altogether there are 57 key requirements identified in AS 9101. These requirements could have a significant impact on the final outcome of an AS 9100 audit. Organizations pursuing AS 9100 registration should place additional emphasis on these focus areas to maximize the results of their audit, and subsequently their audit score. The goal of achieving AS 9100 registration is not just to get a certificate, but also to implement an effective quality system that meets industry expectations and will increase the probability of shipping good product and enhancing customer satisfaction.


Enlarge this picture
Table 3 illustrates a breakdown by section where the key requirements are located. Due to the magnitude of key requirements in Sections 7 and 8, these sections have been broken down by sub section to illustrate where the majority of key requirements are.
So where are these 57 key requirements located throughout AS 9100? A breakdown of the data reveals that 40 of the key requirements are product related—more than two-thirds of the total. Of those, 26 are in Section 7 alone. Every section of the standard contains at least one key requirement.

How do these 57 key requirements impact the score of AS 9100 audits? Within AS 9101 there is a scoring table used to calculate the score of AS 9100 audits. Point values have been allocated by the aerospace industry group based on the importance of specific sub- sections. There are pre-determined point reductions for single and multiple nonconformities. If the nonconformity falls in a key requirement clause, the point reduction is greater. Table 4 illustrates an example of how drastic the point reduction can be.


Enlarge this picture
Table 4: If the nonconformity falls in a key requirement clause, the point reduction is greater. This graphic illustrates an example of how drastic the point reduction can be.
For example, assume two minor nonconformances have been written in Section 4—one is in 4.1 and the other in 4.2.3. Both are in key requirement sections. A section that would have been worth 100 points now has scored 20. By comparison, if the two nonconformities had been in non-key requirement sections, the organization would have scored 80. Obviously the impact of key requirements can be significant.

Organizations seeking AS 9100 registration must realize the impact of key requirements. The score reflects the health of an organization’s quality system, and these results are available directly to customers.

Note that the key requirements are only designated in the AS 9101 checklist, not in the AS 9100 standard. Whether pursuing or maintaining AS 9100 registration, organizations should use the AS 9101 checklist to strategically understand key requirements. Ensuring adequate systems are in place will increase the probability for a maximum score during the audit.



Tec Tips

  • For any nonconformances (NCRs) that are found during an audit, points are deducted from the total possible score.
  • Key requirements, which are clauses of the AS 9100 standard that have been identified to be most critical, carry a greater point value.
  • An organization can receive a higher audit score by ensuring there are no NCRs in key requirement areas.


Roger Ritterbeck
Roger Ritterbeck is QMI Management Systems Registration’s (Toronto, Ontario) aerospace technical expert. For more information, call (800) 247-0802, e-mail rritterbeck@qmi.com or visit www.qmi.com.


Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.



















Most Emailed Articles

  1. Defining True Enterprisewide Quality
  2. Quality Leadership 100
  3. Ford’s Focus
  4. 3-D Laser Scanning Accelerates Inspection
  5. Understanding ISO 13485
  6. 3-D Laser Scanning Accelerates Inspection
  7. Understanding ISO 13485
  8. Rockwell Standard Revealed
  9. SME Adds Videos to YouTube
  10. Finding the Right Calibration Software
Top Searches
  1. quality control
  2. training courses
  3. quality management
  4. calibration
  5. ISO 9000
  6. cmm
  7. gages
  8. reliability design
  9. "probing the limits"
  10. reliability
Most Popular Articles
  1. Understanding ISO 13485 01/02/2008
  2. Quality Leadership 100 02/22/2008
  3. Ford’s Focus 03/26/2008
  4. Quality 101: Calibration of Machine Tools: Why, What and How 02/01/2008
  5. Enhance First Article Inspection 07/16/2007
  6. Manufacturing Excellence:Reducing Cost of Failures 01/02/2008
  7. Living Proof 04/25/2008
  8. 3-D Laser Scanning Accelerates Inspection 03/26/2008
  9. The Inside Track on Six Sigma Training 02/01/2008
© 2008 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy