Quality Magazine
  Home
  Subscribe
  Subscribe to eNewsletter
  Subscription Customer Service
  Online
  Industry Headlines
  eXtras
  Blogs
  Quality Product Spotlights
  White Papers on the Web
  Tech ManufactureXPO
  Quality Downloads
  Webinars
  Quality Showcases
  e-Inserts Plus
  Online Store
  More Product Info
  Archive
  Q-Tube
  Q-Cast Podcasts
  Quality Showrooms
  Brain Teasers
  Current Issue
  Coming Events
  Features
  Departments
  Columns
  Products
  Quality Quick Clicks
  Special Sections
  NDT
  Vision & Sensors
  Aerospace
  How To Guide
  China Editions
  Quality Guides
  Quality Buyers Guide
  Software Selector
  Registrars Guide
  Services Guide
  Quality Services
  Job Marketplace
  Industry Links
  Classifieds
  Career Center
  Events
  Quality Expo 2012
  IMTS 2012
  Meetings and Shows
  Industry Webinars
  Quality Awards
  2012 Quality Plant of the Year Nomination Form
  2012 Quality Professional of the Year Nomination Form
  Quality Leadership 100
  Quality Info
  Media Planning Guide
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Other Dimensions: Thread Ring Gages Revisited
by Hill Cox
February 1, 2007

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare

Setting plugs should be used for the resetting of adjustable thread rings in accordance with the standard.


A year ago I wrote about the value of buying setting plugs along with adjustable thread ring gages, particularly special thread rings. One point I made was that setting plugs should be used for the resetting of adjustable thread rings in accordance with the standard. Taking measurements of them was not accurate enough.

The problem starts with buyers of special rings who do not wish to pay for proper setting plugs. When it’s time for calibration, the hunt begins for someone who has plugs and of course, it’s unlikely they will be found because calibration laboratories would go broke keeping special setting plugs on hand in most cases. Some laboratories are ready to cash in on this situation by offering to “measure” special adjustable thread ring gages so the technician won’t have to buy the right thing. And, wow, the cost will be a lot cheaper than buying setting plugs.

Makers of specialized calibration devices used for such work all show calibrating thread ring gages, but the key here is that the rings involved are solid, not adjustable and invariably made to looser European specifications. We have such a unit in our lab but would never use it for adjustable thread ring gages because we know the problems that would follow.

Using these devices, simple pitch diameter is all that is measured. Errors in linear pitch and out-of-roundness are either unknown or never measured, so the “functional” or “working” size of the ring is unknown.

Rings with three slots in them will exhibit triangular lobing when adjusted. Those rings with a single slot will go oval but because the open slot is where a second reading has to be taken to determine how bad it is, the error in this regard is usually an unknown. Any adjustment to a perfect ring will result in misaligned threads at the slot.

Some folks will put forward the case that roundness doesn’t matter all that much. Maybe they’re thinking that the gage will now closely resemble an adjustable split die’s geometry, making it even better for cleaning up the thread while “gaging” it.

While a setting plug can have some of the problems noted previously, they are smaller and measurable so they can be kept within limits set by the standards. Setting a ring to them will introduce and include the errors noted earlier, but at least you know the functional size of the ring will be a close match to the plug. You never know what the working size of a ring is if it has been “measured” for simple pitch diameter only.

If direct measurement of adjustable thread rings was a practical method, you can bet every thread gage maker would have at least one universal measuring machine. They would pay for themselves in a year because setting plugs would not have to be made. Another benefit would be shorter delivery times for special rings no longer held up waiting for the plugs to be made.

Some folks promote the idea that variable gages are suitable for calibrating fixed limit gages. Simply put, the theory goes something like, if it can measure the product, it can measure gages—the only difference between them is the tolerance. My take on the theory is that it is an example of the blind leading the blind. And because these are cheaper than the measuring machine mentioned earlier, gage manufacturers would use them if they could, but they don’t because they know better.

Typical of these gages are internal calipers with two arms with ball contacts on them. They are great for measuring components but some folks are using them to “measure” adjustable thread ring gages. They cannot do this with any degree of certainty for the same reasons noted above. In addition, these gages often are set using a plain ring gage so ball roundness is added to the sources of errors in the process. And that alone could introduce errors of close to half the tolerance of the ring.

If the “measurements” you’re getting on your adjustable thread ring gages are not corrected for variations in roundness and linear pitch, for example, you’re getting less than half the story. What you don’t know could haunt you later and no medium that I know will be able to dismiss that sort of ghost of measurements past into the light.



Hill Cox
Hill Cox is president of the American Measuring Tool Manufacturers Association and president of Frank J. Cox Sales Ltd. He can be reached at CoxH@bnp.com.

|PrintEmail

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.


























Most Emailed Articles

  1. Management: A Closer Look: Understanding Risk Management for Medical Device Manufacturers
  2. Auto Industry Goes on U.S. Hiring Binge
  3. Jim’s Gems: Don’t Focus on What Seems Unfair
  4. GD&T Workshop: A Top Down View
  5. Understanding ISO 13485
  6. Other Dimensions: Does New Stuff Have to be Calibrated?
  7. Software & Analysis: FMEAs for the Medical Industry: Which FMEA Type Should I Use?
  8. Face of Quality: Focus on the Vital Few
  9. Software & Analysis: FMEAs for the Medical Industry: Which FMEA Type Should I Use?
  10. Quality 101: Surface Finish Measurement Basics
Top Searches
  1. Quality 101
  2. variation management
  3. Quality Management Systems
  4. quality inspector
  5. root cause
  6. quality performance indicators
  7. quality assurance
  8. LEAN Quality Management Systems
  9. surface finish
  10. employee involvment
 
Most Popular Articles
  1. Measurement: The Democratization of Measurement 01/27/2012
  2. Test & Inspection: Sensing the Thread 01/30/2012
  3. U.S. Manufacturing Making a Comeback 02/01/2012
  4. Management: A Closer Look: Understanding Risk Management for Medical Device Manufacturers 01/03/2012
  5. Understanding ISO 13485 01/02/2008
  6. Quality 101: An Introduction to Gage R&R 12/01/2005
  7. Other Dimensions: Does New Stuff Have to be Calibrated? 01/31/2012
  8. Jim's Gems: Think Ahead 01/30/2012
  9. Quality Management 2.0: Deming's 7 Deadly Diseases of Management 01/20/2012
  10. Quality Measurement: Effects of Screw-Thread Geometry 10/01/2005
© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy