Quality Magazine
  Home
  Subscribe
  Online
  Industry Headlines
  Web Exclusives
  Quality Product Spotlights
  White Papers on the Web
  Quality Downloads
  Classifieds
  Industry Links
  E-Cards Plus
  Online Store
  More Product Info
  Archive
  Current Issue
  Coming Events
  Features
  Departments
  Columns
  Brain Teasers
  Products
  Quality Quick Clicks
  Special Sections
  NDT
  Vision & Sensors
  Aerospace
  How To Guide
  China Editions
  Quality Guides
  Quality Buyers Guide
  Software Selector
  Registrars Guide
  Services Guide
  Events
  Quality Measurement Conference
  Quality NDT Conference
  Quality Expo Detroit
  IMTS 2008
  Quality Awards
  2009 Quality Plant of the Year
  2009 Quality Professional of the Year
  Quality Leadership 100
  Quality Info
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Want to use this article? Click here for options!
Email this Article Print View
Quality 101: Speak a Common Language
An isometric view of the assembly shows a rotating shaft inserted into the block assembly. <i>Source: Dimensional Control Systems Inc.</i>
An isometric view of the assembly shows a rotating shaft inserted into the block assembly. Source: Dimensional Control Systems Inc.
by Earl Morgan
April 18, 2006

GD&T helps manufacturers overcome interference conditions.


Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing (GD&T) is the language of communicating dimensional information on a product part print or process drawing. Manufacturers find it valuable to precisely communicate functional product characteristics, manufacturing process controls and gaging measurement plans.

GD&T is used in many industrial applications where assembly processes or complex component geometry is present. Most notable, are applications in transportation, such as aerospace, automotive and shipbuilding; consumer appliances; electronics packaging; mining; and food processing. GD&T is highly symbolic and standardized in documents, including ASME Y14.5M-1994 and ISO 1101-1983 (E).

GD&T methods of communicating are increasingly important as the world’s economy moves toward globalization. Far-flung supplier lines in recent years have resulted in hidden costs for assemblers. Someone may reason that a product design is thoroughly validated when it has been established in a controlled manufacturing process.

Theoretically, the design could be migrated to another supplier either for increased volume or lower cost.



Enlarge this picture
When the assembly is complete, the plate is captured between a shoulder on the shaft and the sprocket. The intended arrangement leaves a 0.25-millimeter design gap between the sprocket, plate and shaft shoulder so that the shaft is free to rotate. <i>Source: Dimensional Control Systems Inc.</i>
When the assembly is complete, the plate is captured between a shoulder on the shaft and the sprocket. The intended arrangement leaves a 0.25-millimeter design gap between the sprocket, plate and shaft shoulder so that the shaft is free to rotate. Source: Dimensional Control Systems Inc.
Take the case of an automotive manufacturer who had been successfully producing the same engine for several years, but introduced a new supplier for the engine’s cylinder block. With no apparent reason, interference conditions appeared during final assembly.

Consider the assembly of four components—a rotating shaft, a chain sprocket, a plate and a block assembly. To assemble, the rotating shaft is first inserted into the block assembly. Next the plate is slipped over the end of the shaft and fastened to the face of the block. Pushing the shaft against the plate, the sprocket is fastened to the end of the shaft. When the assembly is complete, the plate is captured between a shoulder on the shaft and the sprocket. The intended arrangement leaves a 0.25-millimeter design gap between the sprocket, plate and shaft shoulder so that the shaft is free to rotate.

In this plant, however, some of the sprockets were scoring the plate and restricting shaft rotation. Obviously the sprocket-to-plate design gap became critical for its function in the assembly. This event was mystifying since there were no recent changes, nor were any components out-of-spec. The only correlating factor was the new supplier for block assemblies.

In reviewing the design GD&T, a profile of surface callout on the block face:
| 0.3 |A-B|E specified the allowed variation in surface location relative to its datums, the lower bore in the block. This means the face should not exceed +/- 0.15 millimeter from its basic dimension when the block is fixtured with an expanding arbor in the lower bore A-B, and slid against a locating pad on datum feature E. The profile of surface callout was presented alone on the block part print; it did not have other refining GD&T callouts like perpendicularity or flatness.

The profile callout primarily is used to specify the allowable variation in location, but in the absence of other callouts, it also allows orientation or tilt, and form—flatness—to vary within the same tolerance zone.



Enlarge this picture
GD&T helps communicate dimensional information about this block. <i>Source: Dimensional Control Systems Inc.</i>
GD&T helps communicate dimensional information about this block. Source: Dimensional Control Systems Inc.
So even though all parts were within design specifications, the way the profile tolerance was interpreted differed from supplier to supplier. The original supplier process had good control over orientation, but it was not documented in the GD&T. The original supplier took advantage of the tolerance zone completely for location variation, thus allowing the machine to run longer between tool changes.

The new supplier process, however, was using up a substantial portion of the tolerance as orientation or tilt variation. Components from both processes passed inspection for profile, but the second had an inherent tilt. The tilt on the block face would cause the plate to tilt reducing the design gap to the sprocket.

The fix was to add a perpendicularity callout to the existing profile on the block face. The perpendicularity refines the tolerance zone of the profile to limit the orientation or tilt variation relative to the upper shaft bore: ⊥| 0.15 |C-D. The effect of profile and perpendicularity together means the face should be held square or perpendicular within +/-0.075 millimeter relative to the upper bore C-D, and should be held within +/-0.15 millimeter of its basic dimension relative to the lower bore A-B and face E.

GD&T helped the manufacturers in this example fix their interference conditions that appeared during final assembly after switching suppliers. GD&T helps all organizations around the world speak a common language.



Earl Morgan
emorgan@3dcs.com
Earl Morgan is a consultant for Dimensional Control Systems Inc., (Troy, MI). He is a graduate of Michigan State University and is a 27-year veteran in the field of dimensional control, variation analysis, computer simulation and related software development. Contact him at emorgan@3dcs.com or (248) 269-9777. For more information about DCS, a provider of dimensional engineering consulting services and software solutions, visit www.3dcs.com.

Links

  Comments (0)Post a Comment
 



 



Please enter the verification code as it appears in the box above.
 



















Most Emailed Articles

  1. Ford’s Focus
  2. Quality Leadership 100
  3. 3-D Laser Scanning Accelerates Inspection
  4. Rockwell Standard Revealed
  5. Defining True Enterprisewide Quality
  6. Finding the Right Calibration Software
  7. SME Adds Videos to YouTube
  8. Faster Computed Tomography
  9. Probing the Limits: ISO 9001 Proves Ineffective
  10. Faster Computed Tomography
Top Searches
  1. quality control
  2. training courses
  3. quality management
  4. calibration
  5. ISO 9000
  6. cmm
  7. gages
  8. "probing the limits"
  9. reliability
  10. reliability design
Most Popular Articles
  1. Living Proof 04/25/2008
  2. Understanding ISO 13485 01/02/2008
  3. Quality Leadership 100 02/22/2008
  4. Enhance First Article Inspection 07/16/2007
  5. Carbide Probes Achieves ISO 9000 Certification 05/05/2008
  6. Ford’s Focus 03/26/2008
  7. Carl Zeiss SMT Opens North American Headquarters 05/05/2008
  8. The Inside Track on Six Sigma Training 02/01/2008
  9. 3-D Laser Scanning Accelerates Inspection 03/26/2008
© 2008 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy