Quality Magazine
  Home
  Subscribe
  Subscribe to eNewsletter
  Subscription Customer Service
  Online
  Industry Headlines
  eXtras
  Blogs
  Quality Product Spotlights
  White Papers on the Web
  Tech ManufactureXPO
  Quality Downloads
  Webinars
  Quality Showcases
  e-Inserts Plus
  Online Store
  More Product Info
  Archive
  Q-Tube
  Q-Cast Podcasts
  Quality Showrooms
  Brain Teasers
  Current Issue
  Coming Events
  Features
  Departments
  Columns
  Products
  Quality Quick Clicks
  Special Sections
  NDT
  Vision & Sensors
  Aerospace
  How To Guide
  China Editions
  Quality Guides
  Quality Buyers Guide
  Software Selector
  Registrars Guide
  Services Guide
  Quality Services
  Job Marketplace
  Industry Links
  Classifieds
  Career Center
  Events
  Quality Expo 2012
  IMTS 2012
  Meetings and Shows
  Industry Webinars
  Quality Awards
  2012 Quality Plant of the Year Nomination Form
  2012 Quality Professional of the Year Nomination Form
  Quality Leadership 100
  Quality Info
  Media Planning Guide
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Study: Ford Quality Rivaling Japanese Counterparts

April 21, 2009

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



DEARBORN, MI—Ford Motor Co. surpassed Honda in initial vehicle quality for the first time and reached new levels of customer satisfaction with vehicle quality, according to a 2009 U.S. Global Quality Research System (GQRS) survey conducted for Ford by RDA Group of Bloomfield Hills, MI.

Ford also is statistically tied with Toyota at the top of the industry when it comes to initial vehicle quality, according the survey.

“This is truly a significant accomplishment for us," says Bennie Fowler, Ford group vice president, Global Quality. "Honda and Toyota have claimed bragging rights for years, but now we are seeing our hard work pay off. It's evident in study after study.”

The latest GQRS survey measured 2009 model year vehicle initial quality in two categories: the number of "things gone wrong," and customer satisfaction with vehicle quality in the first three months of ownership.

In the first quarter of 2009, Ford, Lincoln and Mercury vehicles saw things gone wrong fall by 5% to 1,228 per 1,000 vehicles, significantly better than Honda's 1,422 things gone wrong per 1,000 vehicles and statistically equal to Toyota's 1,150.

In addition, the survey shows that Ford Lincoln Mercury improved two percentage points to 79% in customer satisfaction with vehicle quality, which puts Ford's domestic brands in a tie with Toyota and Honda for industry leadership.

"Ford's commitment to quality is really paying off as they continue to rival Honda and Toyota on both initial quality and customer satisfaction with the quality," says Donald Pietrowski, president, RDA Group.

The following models led their respective segments in the survey:

  • Ford Mustang - initial quality and customer satisfaction for sports cars
  • Ford Taurus - initial quality for large cars
  • Ford Taurus X - initial quality for crossover utilities
  • Mercury Milan - initial quality for midsize cars
  • Ford Ranger - initial quality for compact pickups

    The new 2009 Ford F-150 recorded quality levels that equate to less than one problem per vehicle, as did the Taurus, Taurus X, Fusion, Milan and Edge.

    The GQRS study is conducted on a quarterly basis with scores assessed from survey responses collected from owners of vehicles purchased within specific short-term time frames.

    New vehicle owners are asked to report any defects or issues as well as rate their satisfaction with vehicle quality on a scale of 1 to 10 across an array of vehicle systems and features.


  • |PrintEmail

    Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.


























    Most Emailed Articles

    1. Management: A Closer Look: Understanding Risk Management for Medical Device Manufacturers
    2. Auto Industry Goes on U.S. Hiring Binge
    3. Jim’s Gems: Don’t Focus on What Seems Unfair
    4. GD&T Workshop: A Top Down View
    5. Understanding ISO 13485
    6. Other Dimensions: Does New Stuff Have to be Calibrated?
    7. Software & Analysis: FMEAs for the Medical Industry: Which FMEA Type Should I Use?
    8. Face of Quality: Focus on the Vital Few
    9. Software & Analysis: FMEAs for the Medical Industry: Which FMEA Type Should I Use?
    10. Quality 101: Surface Finish Measurement Basics
    Top Searches
    1. Quality 101
    2. variation management
    3. Quality Management Systems
    4. quality inspector
    5. root cause
    6. quality performance indicators
    7. quality assurance
    8. LEAN Quality Management Systems
    9. surface finish
    10. employee involvment
     
    Most Popular Articles
    1. Measurement: The Democratization of Measurement 01/27/2012
    2. Test & Inspection: Sensing the Thread 01/30/2012
    3. U.S. Manufacturing Making a Comeback 02/01/2012
    4. Management: A Closer Look: Understanding Risk Management for Medical Device Manufacturers 01/03/2012
    5. Understanding ISO 13485 01/02/2008
    6. Quality 101: An Introduction to Gage R&R 12/01/2005
    7. Other Dimensions: Does New Stuff Have to be Calibrated? 01/31/2012
    8. Jim's Gems: Think Ahead 01/30/2012
    9. Quality Management 2.0: Deming's 7 Deadly Diseases of Management 01/20/2012
    10. Quality Measurement: Effects of Screw-Thread Geometry 10/01/2005
    © 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy