- THE MAGAZINE
- WEB EXCLUSIVES
View Archived Issues
When talking with prospects and customers, testing machine manufacturers often come across symptoms that imply the current situation could be improved dramatically with a new investment in technology, specifically a well-engineered materials testing system.
“GD&T was developed to address the many problems that had been encountered over the years as companies tried to describe their part geometry.”
If you can’t trust your measurement system, you can’t trust the data it produces.
Ford had a problem. On a small number of vehicles, the powertrain hardware and software malfunctioned.
The rapid growth of in-line gaging over the last few years has been focused primarily on the use of this approach as a tool for improving quality.
As I write this, America has just reelected a president, celebrated a holiday of family and probably too many mashed potatoes, and started preparing for the New Year. By the time you read this, the country will be beginning resolution season.
Last year at this time I wrote a column in which I criticized the practice of having calibration labs make acceptance decisions in their reports.
As the New Year begins, it appears the automotive industry has weathered the literal and figurative storms of 2012. The criticism concerning lack of industry innovation has momentarily quieted as 50 new models were introduced in 2012.
Goal setting is a powerful process for thinking about your future, motivating yourself, and turning your vision of the future into reality.
Risk can’t be discussed in general terms. Risks are specific in nature. Executives, entrepreneurs and consumers should identify and describe risks as articulately as possible.
GD&T is difficult to get right even though it is very logical. What does “right” mean? Right means several things, but mainly that it imposes achievable, fully function based and only necessary permissible limits of imperfection using absolutely syntactically correct code.