Quality Magazine
  Home
  Subscribe
  Subscribe to eNewsletter
  Online
  Industry Headlines
  Web Exclusives
  Quality Product Spotlights
  White Papers on the Web
  Quality Downloads
  Webinars
  Classifieds
  Industry Links
  E-Cards Plus
  Online Store
  More Product Info
  Archive
  Q-Tube
  Current Issue
  Coming Events
  Features
  Departments
  Columns
  Brain Teasers
  Products
  Quality Quick Clicks
  Special Sections
  NDT
  Vision & Sensors
  Aerospace
  How To Guide
  China Editions
  Quality Guides
  Quality Buyers Guide
  Software Selector
  Registrars Guide
  Services Guide
  Events
  Quality Measurement Conference
  Quality NDT Conference
  Quality Expo Detroit
  IMTS 2008
  Quality Awards
  2009 Quality Plant of the Year
  2009 Quality Professional of the Year
  Quality Leadership 100
  Quality Info
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Probing the Limits: ISO 9001 Proves Ineffective
by Scott Dalgleish
April 1, 2005

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShareshare Use



It has been a while since I commented on ISO 9001 so it is time to re-visit the topic with some statistical data. More than two years ago, I wrote a column, “ISO 9000: More Hindrance than Help,” where I described my regret for championing ISO 9000 in my company. Because we already had a quality-centric culture, I found that ISO 9000 just added expense and overhead to our operation.

In the course of a published debate on ISO 9000,

a British quality magazine recently referenced an insightful article, “ISO 9000 Registration’s Impact on Sales and Profitability: A Longitudinal Analysis of Performance Before and After Accreditation,” in the International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management (Vol. 19, No. 6, 2002) that sheds light on the value of ISO 9000. The study starts by acknowledging that it is widely documented and clearly proven that ISO 9000-registered companies outperform non-ISO 9000 registered companies. The study sets out to determine if ISO 9000 is the cause for the better performance.

The study examined 800 companies in Spain. Some of the companies were registered, some were in the process of becoming registered and some never became registered. The profitability and sales performance in these companies was analyzed before and after registration during a five-year period.

The study confirms that ISO 9000-registered companies perform better than nonregistered companies. The main finding, though, is that registered companies had the same performance before and after the registration. In short, the study clearly finds that ISO 9000 registration had no affect on sales and profitability performance. Registered companies performed better than nonregistered companies, but they were performing at the same higher level before their ISO 9000 registration.

The contention that ISO 9000 registration improves performance is refuted as a cause-and-effect relationship, and the study speculates that companies that are high-performing tend to

adopt the standard at a higher rate than lower-performing companies, thus giving the deceptive appearance that ISO 9000 registration is correlated to better performance.

Is this bad news for the quality profession? No. In reviewing the literature, other referenced studies found that a focus on quality has a positive effect on return on investment, market share, sales growth, better sales margins and competitive advantage. Quality pays off, but taking a quality approach is unrelated to ISO 9000 registration.

ISO 9000 proponents frequently argue that ISO 9000 fails when top management only wants the certificate and does not really use ISO to improve the system. I agree. The issue is that ISO 9000 is ineffective in making companies put high-performing quality systems in place. Companies either care about quality and benefit from that approach, or they do not care about quality and suffer from that approach. An expensive and time-consuming ISO 9000 certificate just does not play into it. So why register?

How did we get to this state where the quality profession flocked to support a valueless, expensive program? I think there are several reasons. Part of it is herd mentality. The train of thought is, “If I have to get registered, then all my suppliers should too.”

I also think that the consultant-centric leadership at the American Society for Quality (ASQ) drove the ISO 9000 fad as a tremendous revenue-generating opportunity. Although they are improving, ASQ continues to play more of a cheerleading role rather than an objective role in analyzing the quality trend du jour.

Despite my dislike for ISO 9000, my company still is registered. We maintain our ISO 9000 registration because almost all of our big customers require it.

My hope is that I have shed some light on this topic so that companies stop requiring their suppliers to have valueless ISO 9000 registration. If my customers quit demanding that my company be registered, we would use the time we now spend on ISO 9000 maintenance on activities that actually make our products better.

If you agree, eliminate ISO 9000 registration from your approved supplier requirements and let your suppliers start spending their energy in more productive ways.



Scott Dalgleish
Chief Operating Officer at Spectra Logic Corp.

  Comments (2)Post a Comment
Title: Probing the Limits: ISO 9001 Proves Ineffective


Probing the Limits: ISO 9001 Proves Ineffective
by Scott Dalgleish
April 1, 2005

Lets face it. Here we are in 2008 and we're still trying to convience the Detroit three (3) to focus on helping their Tier (1)'s make money and stop the bleeding by mandating suppliers become ISO/TS16949 certified plus piling on their interpretation of the TS requirements as well as, trying to drive sub-suppliers to join the band wagon. Mr. Dalgleish suggested in 2005 we drop the registration so we could focus on spending more energy and resources in a more productive way. When will the Detroit three (3) wakeup or are they so blind they can't see the plant closures from their Ivory towers? What next?


Title: Probing the Limits: ISO 9001 Proves Ineffective


I do agree in case of mandating suppliers to get registered, but the problem is not with ISO9001. ISO9001 has nothing to do with quality of product. It provides a discipline to produce products at certain level consistently. I think it's a way for customer to complain to registrar/accreditation body to mandate the discipline to prove the consistency of
level of quality. I believe ISO9001 must be used by governments to mandate regulations in public/private sectors like hospitals to receive voice of customers.

Regards.





 



 



Please enter the verification code as it appears in the box above.
 



















Most Emailed Articles

  1. Dispelling the Myths of ISO 9001
  2. Quality 101: Improving Quality Through Lean Concepts
  3. Understanding ISO 13485
  4. Quality 101: Surface Finish Measurement Basics
  5. Understanding ISO 13485
  6. What’s in a Name: Accreditation vs. Certification?
  7. Quality 101: Tracking Gage Calibration with a Spreadsheet
  8. Manufacturing Excellence: Excel in the Quality Department
  9. Calibrating Correctly
  10. Adding Value for True Position Measurement
Top Searches
  1. Quality 101
  2. quality questions
  3. TRUE POSITION + STATISTICS
  4. Manufacturing and ISO 9000
  5. process capability
  6. material trace
  7. lean
  8. tracing raw material
  9. ogp
  10. ISO 9001
Most Popular Articles
  1. Understanding ISO 13485 01/02/2008
  2. Case Studies: Proper Training Secures Product Quality 07/31/2008
  3. Manage Metrology Documentation 07/31/2008
  4. Quality 101: Surface Finish Measurement Basics 09/01/2004
  5. Quality 101: Improving Quality Through Lean Concepts 11/21/2007
  6. Dispelling the Myths of ISO 9001 06/27/2008
  7. Thermo Fisher Scientific Receives R&D Award 08/04/2008
  8. What’s in a Name: Accreditation vs. Certification? 06/02/2008
  9. Automotive Initial Quality Makes Considerable Improvements 07/31/2008
  10. Case Studies: Improve Foreign Supplier Quality 07/31/2008
© 2008 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy