Quality Magazine
  Home
  Subscribe
  Subscribe to eNewsletter
  Subscription Customer Service
  Online
  Industry Headlines
  eXtras
  Blogs
  Quality Product Spotlights
  White Papers on the Web
  Tech ManufactureXPO
  Quality Downloads
  Webinars
  Quality Showcases
  e-Inserts Plus
  Online Store
  More Product Info
  Archive
  Q-Tube
  Q-Cast Podcasts
  Quality Showrooms
  Brain Teasers
  Current Issue
  Coming Events
  Features
  Departments
  Columns
  Products
  Quality Quick Clicks
  Special Sections
  NDT
  Vision & Sensors
  Aerospace
  How To Guide
  China Editions
  Quality Guides
  Quality Buyers Guide
  Software Selector
  Registrars Guide
  Services Guide
  Quality Services
  Job Marketplace
  Industry Links
  Classifieds
  Career Center
  Events
  Quality Expo 2012
  IMTS 2012
  Meetings and Shows
  Industry Webinars
  Quality Awards
  2012 Quality Plant of the Year Nomination Form
  2012 Quality Professional of the Year Nomination Form
  Quality Leadership 100
  Quality Info
  Media Planning Guide
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Quality 101:Calibrating Micrometers


April 1, 2004

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare

The standard used in calibrating measuring gages must possess an accuracy greater than a 4:1 ratio over the accuracy of the gage being calibrated. The accuracy of a gage block is typically ±0.000002 inch, and the accuracy of a micrometer is typically ±0.0001 inch. This exceeds the 4:1 ratio. Photo: Mitutoyo America Corp.


The inventor of the modern micrometer, Jean Laurent Palmer, introduced the basic principles of magnification based on screw threads. His design is based on a 1-millimeter, single-pitch open screw thread. One rotation, or 1 millimeter, was divided into 20 equal parts, bringing the smallest resolution to 0.05 millimeter. His design was so advanced and complete, that nothing has been added to or subtracted from his original concept in terms of the principles of operation.

To ensure accuracy, micrometers must be calibrated at regular intervals.



The 4 to 1 rule

• The standard used in calibrating measuring gages must possess an accuracy greater than a 4 to 1 ratio over the accuracy of a gage being calibrated. This common rule of thumb originated some 40 years ago from MIL-STD-45662A, which was first published in 1960. A gage block is used to calibrate an unknown micrometer. The “unknown” is the micrometer and the “known” is the gage block being used. This gage block must have a certificate of traceability to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).

• The use of gage blocks is always the best, because no other standards are more accurate than the gage blocks, and they are the highest in the hierarchy of precision.

• There is a dedicated standard for large micrometers called “standard bar.” Often, the bar is supplied with large-size micrometers, and its end is either spherical or flat.

• It is suggested that the bar without certificate be compared against a traceable gage block or immediately compared against a traceable gage block. This can be done on top of the granite surface plate.



Calibration guidelines for micrometers using a five-point calibration method

1. Look at the frame, for signs of damage, such as indications that it was dropped on the floor.

2. Observe both spindle and anvil faces. They must be flat, free of pinholes and clean. Frosted surfaces may indicate wear.

3. If the micrometer needs repairs, they must be done first. Calibration may proceed only when the gage is in good working order. Move the micrometer from 0 to 25 millimeters (0 to 1 inch) or the entire range and check if the spindle feels continuously smooth throughout the range. In short, check if it is good enough for its intended use. A hard to turn spindle is a sign of age or damage. Do not force it to rotate and have someone look into the cause of malfunction.

4. The micrometer should turn smoothly and freely throughout the entire range, and it should not bind or freeze during the check.

5. Check five points. In inch micrometers check 1.000, 0.500, 0.250, 0.125 and 0.0625 with traceable gage blocks. The zero point is repeatedly checked but never reported. The check points presented here are one suggestion: take the entire range, split it in half, split it in half, split it in half again and split it for the last time. The points checked may be even better if they are replaced by 0.997, 0.502, 0.246, 0.128, 0.611 or any other number for that matter.

6. If 18.5 millimeters is checked on a daily basis, by all means include that number in the calibration procedure to safeguard the system.



|PrintEmail

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.


























Most Emailed Articles

  1. Management: A Closer Look: Understanding Risk Management for Medical Device Manufacturers
  2. Auto Industry Goes on U.S. Hiring Binge
  3. Jim’s Gems: Don’t Focus on What Seems Unfair
  4. GD&T Workshop: A Top Down View
  5. Understanding ISO 13485
  6. Other Dimensions: Does New Stuff Have to be Calibrated?
  7. Software & Analysis: FMEAs for the Medical Industry: Which FMEA Type Should I Use?
  8. Face of Quality: Focus on the Vital Few
  9. Software & Analysis: FMEAs for the Medical Industry: Which FMEA Type Should I Use?
  10. Quality 101: Surface Finish Measurement Basics
Top Searches
  1. Quality 101
  2. variation management
  3. Quality Management Systems
  4. quality inspector
  5. root cause
  6. quality performance indicators
  7. quality assurance
  8. LEAN Quality Management Systems
  9. surface finish
  10. employee involvment
 
Most Popular Articles
  1. Measurement: The Democratization of Measurement 01/27/2012
  2. Test & Inspection: Sensing the Thread 01/30/2012
  3. U.S. Manufacturing Making a Comeback 02/01/2012
  4. Management: A Closer Look: Understanding Risk Management for Medical Device Manufacturers 01/03/2012
  5. Understanding ISO 13485 01/02/2008
  6. Quality 101: An Introduction to Gage R&R 12/01/2005
  7. Other Dimensions: Does New Stuff Have to be Calibrated? 01/31/2012
  8. Jim's Gems: Think Ahead 01/30/2012
  9. Quality Management 2.0: Deming's 7 Deadly Diseases of Management 01/20/2012
  10. Quality Measurement: Effects of Screw-Thread Geometry 10/01/2005
© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy