Quality Magazine
  Home
  Subscribe
  Subscribe to eNewsletter
  Subscription Customer Service
  Online
  Industry Headlines
  eXtras
  Blogs
  Quality Product Spotlights
  White Papers on the Web
  Quality Downloads
  Webinars
  Quality Showcases
  e-Inserts Plus
  Online Store
  More Product Info
  Archive
  Q-Tube
  Q-Cast Podcasts
  Quality Showrooms
  Current Issue
  Coming Events
  Features
  Departments
  Columns
  Brain Teasers
  Products
  Quality Quick Clicks
  Special Sections
  NDT
  Vision & Sensors
  Aerospace
  How To Guide
  Global Editions
  China Editions
  Quality Guides
  Quality Buyers Guide
  Software Selector
  Registrars Guide
  Services Guide
  Quality Services
  Job Marketplace
  Industry Links
  Classifieds
  Career Center
  Q-Pons
  Events
  2010 Quality Conferences
  Quality Expo South 2010
  IMTS 2010
  Meetings and Shows
  Industry Webinars
  Quality Awards
  2010 Quality Plant of the Year
  2010 Quality Professional of the Year
  Quality Leadership 100
  Quality Info
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Quality Initiatives Increase Savings

February 1, 2003

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



CHAPEL HILL, NC—Each year companies save up to 10% of annual revenues through successful implementation of quality initiatives, according to research and consulting firm Best Practices LLC.

Benchmarking research conducted by Best Practices LLC highlights successful practices across several different dimensions of business process management and improvement, including developing an integrated approach to process management, techniques for identifying process improvement opportunities, programs and steps to improve processes, and tools for tracking process improvement.

For example, successful companies employ the following tactics:

l With a focused, rapid deployment of a Six Sigma plan, a major financial services company was able to save $75 million in productivity benefits, reduce customer complaints by 29% and increase stock value by 52%.

l Leading companies establish internal quality awards to promote the benchmarking function. For example, one company honors an employee annually with its Quality Award. Recipients receive a celebration within their organization.

l Top companies divide benchmarking data according to audience. For example, a leading telecom equipment manufacturer separates benchmarking information into administrative and technical categories. The administrative information is then posted on internal electronic message boards, whereas the technical information is more specifically targeted to key stakeholders.

For more information on the benchmarking research, visit www3.best-in-class.com.



|PrintEmail

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.



















Most Emailed Articles

  1. Optimize Your Quality Management System
  2. The Importance of Hypothesis Testing in Quality Management
  3. Quality 101: Proper Care of Handheld Measuring Tools
  4. Quality 101: Improving Quality Through Lean Concepts
  5. Case Studies: GM’s Garage of Dreams Captured in 3-D
  6. ISO 13485: Medical Devices and Risk Management
  7. Quality Measurement: Analyze Automatic Microscopy-Based Image Analysis
  8. Understanding ISO 13485
  9. Face of Quality: Set Goals; Earn Success
  10. Honda Begins Operation of New Solar Hydrogen Station
Most Popular Articles
  1. Ford Turned a Profit in Tumultuous 2009 01/29/2010
  2. Understanding ISO 13485 01/02/2008
  3. Quality Management: Quality Leadership 100 01/29/2010
  4. Quality 101: Surface Finish Measurement Basics 09/01/2004
  5. Quality Remix: More on Quality - Quality Mismanagement 01/26/2010
  6. Quality 101: An Introduction to Gage R&R 12/01/2005
  7. Optimize Your Quality Management System 11/30/2009
  8. Quality Software & Analysis: APQP Revisited 01/29/2010
  9. Quality 101: Improving Quality Through Lean Concepts 11/21/2007
  10. Quality Measurement: Analyze Automatic Microscopy-Based Image Analysis 01/29/2010
© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy
Your Feedback