Quality Magazine
  Home
  Subscribe
  Subscribe to eNewsletter
  Subscription Customer Service
  Online
  Industry Headlines
  eXtras
  Blogs
  Quality Product Spotlights
  White Papers on the Web
  Tech ManufactureXPO
  Quality Downloads
  Webinars
  Quality Showcases
  e-Inserts Plus
  Online Store
  More Product Info
  Archive
  Q-Tube
  Q-Cast Podcasts
  Quality Showrooms
  Brain Teasers
  Current Issue
  Coming Events
  Features
  Departments
  Columns
  Products
  Quality Quick Clicks
  Special Sections
  NDT
  Vision & Sensors
  Aerospace
  How To Guide
  China Editions
  Quality Guides
  Quality Buyers Guide
  Software Selector
  Registrars Guide
  Services Guide
  Quality Services
  Job Marketplace
  Industry Links
  Classifieds
  Career Center
  Events
  Quality Expo 2012
  IMTS 2012
  Meetings and Shows
  Industry Webinars
  Quality Awards
  2012 Quality Plant of the Year Nomination Form
  2012 Quality Professional of the Year Nomination Form
  Quality Leadership 100
  Quality Info
  Media Planning Guide
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Quality Initiatives Increase Savings

February 1, 2003

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



CHAPEL HILL, NC—Each year companies save up to 10% of annual revenues through successful implementation of quality initiatives, according to research and consulting firm Best Practices LLC.

Benchmarking research conducted by Best Practices LLC highlights successful practices across several different dimensions of business process management and improvement, including developing an integrated approach to process management, techniques for identifying process improvement opportunities, programs and steps to improve processes, and tools for tracking process improvement.

For example, successful companies employ the following tactics:

l With a focused, rapid deployment of a Six Sigma plan, a major financial services company was able to save $75 million in productivity benefits, reduce customer complaints by 29% and increase stock value by 52%.

l Leading companies establish internal quality awards to promote the benchmarking function. For example, one company honors an employee annually with its Quality Award. Recipients receive a celebration within their organization.

l Top companies divide benchmarking data according to audience. For example, a leading telecom equipment manufacturer separates benchmarking information into administrative and technical categories. The administrative information is then posted on internal electronic message boards, whereas the technical information is more specifically targeted to key stakeholders.

For more information on the benchmarking research, visit www3.best-in-class.com.



|PrintEmail

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.


























Most Emailed Articles

  1. Management: A Closer Look: Understanding Risk Management for Medical Device Manufacturers
  2. Auto Industry Goes on U.S. Hiring Binge
  3. Jim’s Gems: Don’t Focus on What Seems Unfair
  4. GD&T Workshop: A Top Down View
  5. Understanding ISO 13485
  6. Other Dimensions: Does New Stuff Have to be Calibrated?
  7. Software & Analysis: FMEAs for the Medical Industry: Which FMEA Type Should I Use?
  8. Face of Quality: Focus on the Vital Few
  9. Software & Analysis: FMEAs for the Medical Industry: Which FMEA Type Should I Use?
  10. Quality 101: Surface Finish Measurement Basics
Top Searches
  1. Quality 101
  2. variation management
  3. Quality Management Systems
  4. quality inspector
  5. root cause
  6. quality performance indicators
  7. quality assurance
  8. LEAN Quality Management Systems
  9. surface finish
  10. employee involvment
 
Most Popular Articles
  1. Measurement: The Democratization of Measurement 01/27/2012
  2. Test & Inspection: Sensing the Thread 01/30/2012
  3. U.S. Manufacturing Making a Comeback 02/01/2012
  4. Management: A Closer Look: Understanding Risk Management for Medical Device Manufacturers 01/03/2012
  5. Understanding ISO 13485 01/02/2008
  6. Quality 101: An Introduction to Gage R&R 12/01/2005
  7. Other Dimensions: Does New Stuff Have to be Calibrated? 01/31/2012
  8. Jim's Gems: Think Ahead 01/30/2012
  9. Quality Management 2.0: Deming's 7 Deadly Diseases of Management 01/20/2012
  10. Quality Measurement: Effects of Screw-Thread Geometry 10/01/2005
© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy