Quality Magazine
  Home
  Subscribe
  Subscribe to eNewsletter
  Subscription Customer Service
  Online
  Industry Headlines
  eXtras
  Blogs
  Quality Product Spotlights
  White Papers on the Web
  Quality Downloads
  Webinars
  Quality Showcases
  e-Inserts Plus
  Online Store
  More Product Info
  Archive
  Q-Tube
  Q-Cast Podcasts
  Quality Showrooms
  Current Issue
  Coming Events
  Features
  Departments
  Columns
  Brain Teasers
  Products
  Quality Quick Clicks
  Special Sections
  NDT
  Vision & Sensors
  Aerospace
  How To Guide
  Global Editions
  China Editions
  Quality Guides
  Quality Buyers Guide
  Software Selector
  Registrars Guide
  Services Guide
  Quality Services
  Job Marketplace
  Industry Links
  Classifieds
  Career Center
  Events
  2010 Quality Conferences
  Quality Expo South 2010
  IMTS 2010
  Meetings and Shows
  Industry Webinars
  Quality Awards
  2011 Quality Plant of the Year
  2011 Quality Professional of the Year
  Quality Leadership 100
  Quality Info
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Magnetic Particle Inspection Gets Revitalized
by Paul Dunnwald
February 23, 2006

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare

Enlarge this picture
A direct contact method of magnetizing ring-shaped parts may be used to locate circumferential defects. Source: Magnaflux
A direct contact method of magnetizing ring-shaped parts may be used to locate circumferential defects. Source: Magnaflux
Induced current fixtures provide a tool for repeatability and ease of the magnetic particle inspection process.


The difficulty with processing ring-shaped parts for aerospace applications is a risk of deformation, or burning or arcing of the part when clamped between contact plates. Correct part processing requires the part to be clamped twice, thus doubling the risk. The part must be turned 90 degrees between the two shots in order to inspect the area that comes in contact with the clamps because an indication may not develop in this area.


For the MPI process, current machinery can be designed as stand alone (integrated power supply), or as a slave unit (separate power source needed, such as a wet bench). Source: Magnaflux
For the MPI process, current machinery can be designed as stand alone (integrated power supply), or as a slave unit (separate power source needed, such as a wet bench). Source: Magnaflux
Ring-shaped parts, saucers and some gears are ideal for an induced current fixture. Most people do not use induced current fixtures because they have never been exposed to them or do not understand how they work. The technology, as applied to the magnetic particle inspection (MPI) process, has been around since the 1940s. Current MPI machinery can be designed as stand-alone units with an integrated power supply or as a slave unit with a separate power source needed, such as a wet bench. Induced current fixtures can be used in wet or dry applications.

The theory of operation for an induced current fixture includes several different rationalizations. The induced current fixture can find indications traditionally found with a direct current shot. Processing a round part with direct current requires a minimum of two orientations and can subject sensitive parts to pressures and heat that many designers try to avoid. The advantage of the induced current fixture is a noncontact method, and if running bearing races, or fine gears, contact surface can be a significant issue. Also, the full part can be processed in one step, saving time.

So what makes an induced current fixture different from a normal coil? The answer is simple: the laminated core. Laminated, soft iron works best as a core material.

The core makes the system more efficient. First, consider traditional formulas for the calculation of current through the coil. There are several variations to the formula depending on factors such as fill and types of current, but it is important to consider the current calculation formulas.



The bearing race

Enlarge this picture
The induced current fixture is different from a normal coil because it has a laminated core. Source: Magnaflux
The induced current fixture is different from a normal coil because it has a laminated core. Source: Magnaflux
The bearing race requires a lot of current because of the poor length-to-diameter (l/d) ratio; this is true of all the shapes mentioned earlier. One trick to demagnetize parts with poor l/d ratios is to stack them, thus changing the l/d ratio. Adding the iron core does the same thing. Adding extra iron to the magnetic field changes the formula because the l/d ratio changes. The iron core needs to be included in the calculation. By calculating the mass distribution of the system—core and bearing race—a different l/d ratio is derived and lowers the current requirements for a coil shot. A simple method to do this is:
  • Calculate the l/d ratio for the core.
  • Calculate the l/d ratio for the ring.
  • Weigh each part and add the weights together.
  • Figure a percentage of weight for each part.
  • Use the weight percentage for each part and multiply it by the l/d ratio for the part.
  • Add the new l/d ratios together for a weighted average l/d ratio for the system.
  • Now apply traditional formulas using this new l/d ratio.

Another approach is to look at the ring as the inner winding of a transformer. The coil on most machines is five turns; the ring becomes a one-turn coil. Some manufacturer’s unit coils are considered the primary winding, while the ring becomes the secondary winding.



Enlarge this picture
The induced current fixture is different from a normal coil because it has a laminated core.  Source: Magnaflux
The induced current fixture is different from a normal coil because it has a laminated core. Source: Magnaflux
Transformers come in many forms. Air core and iron core are two common types. The laminated soft-iron core in this case can be thought of as the iron core of the transformer. It acts as a magnetic bridge to make the field jump between windings more efficiently. In this case, the system is analogous to an air core transformer vs. an iron core transformer. The iron core is more efficient.

For example, if this system were 100% efficient, the current in the MPI unit coil is 1,000 amps, 5 turns; the current in a one-turn bearing race is 5,000 amps. The system is far from 100% efficient and this loss in efficiency translates to lower amperage in the ring. A typical power transformer is 80% efficient, the induced current fixture is closer to 25% efficient and a coil alone would be close to 5% efficient. Based on this, it is easy to see how much the iron core adds to the system. After the current is induced into the ring, it will magnetize and react just like a direct current shot.

These two explanations are simplified for ease of understanding. Operators should understand that the induced current fixture is only one of many tools developed through the years to make the MPI process easier and more repeatable. The induced current fixture can be used in AC or DC circuits.

When used in DC circuits, it is best and most efficient when coupled with three-phase full wave DC. It also should be noted that the quick break is essential for the induced current fixture to work correctly when used with three-phase full-wave DC. AC should be used with an induced current fixture, only when the part under test is a soft iron.



The MPL yoke

Another version of the induced current fixture is known as a yoke. The MPI yoke incorporates the same techniques and principles as the induced current fixture. Care should be taken when comparing yokes to induced current fixtures because placement of the part under test is different for the two techniques. As in all cases, the direction and strength of the magnetic field is key to obtaining reliable, repeatable results.

Manufacturers offer many configurations of induced current fixtures. Standard versions can be placed on top of wet horizontal units. Standard slave units have quick break built into the electronics and self-powered units come equipped with the same functions as standard wet benches. Core sizes can range from 0.25 inch diameter to more than 12 inches.



Paul Dunnwald
Paul Dunnwald is equipment business unit manager at Magnaflux (Glenview, IL). For more information, call (847) 657-5300 or visit www.magnaflux.com.

|PrintEmail

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.

























Most Emailed Articles

  1. Jim's Gems: Achievers Aren't Afraid of Success
  2. Case Study: Self-Serve Metrology Keeps Quality Operations Lean
  3. Lean Six Sigma: Red Hot Relevance
  4. Levels of Precision: A Field Guide to Dimensional Gages
  5. Back to Business
  6. The Ins and Outs of Ballbar Calibration
  7. Quality Innovations: Measure on the Machine
  8. Understanding ISO 13485
  9. Quality Innovations: Measure on the Machine
  10. Understanding ISO 13485
Top Searches
  1. Quality Management Systems
  2. Calibration
  3. Quality 101
  4. six sigma
  5. control charts
  6. GD&T
  7. First Articles
  8. case study
  9. control plans
  10. Cox
Most Popular Articles
  1. Manufacturing Excellence: Old Dog, Same Tricks 06/30/2010
  2. Jim's Gems: Achievers Aren't Afraid of Success 07/19/2010
  3. Understanding ISO 13485 01/02/2008
  4. Quality 101: An Introduction to Gage R&R 12/01/2005
  5. Quality 101: Surface Finish Measurement Basics 09/01/2004
  6. Case Study: Self-Serve Metrology Keeps Quality Operations Lean 06/30/2010
  7. Lean Six Sigma: Red Hot Relevance 06/02/2010
  8. Quality Remix: A Very Cool Solution 07/19/2010
  9. Enhance First Article Inspection 07/16/2007
  10. Quality Measurement: Effects of Screw-Thread Geometry 10/01/2005
© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy