Alloy identification and analysis is an essential aspect of numerous industrial applications, ranging from scrap metal recycling to the manufacture of special steels for aircraft engines. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometry is one method that can be used for alloy analysis. The advantages of XRF have established the technique as an industry standard.
The importance of alloy analysis cannot be overestimated. Many alloys are similar in appearance and, therefore, can be easily confused after identifying labels, such as mill test reports, have been removed. Errors can have major cost implications-product failure, machine downtime and loss of consumer confidence all being possible consequences.
The challenges of analyzing a large variety of alloying elements with wide ranges of concentrations by XRF are well known to the metals industry, in particular the matrix corrections needed and the large number of reference materials required for high-quality results.
WDXRF Analysis of AlloysThe data presented here demonstrate the use of a wavelength dispersive X-ray fluorescence (WDXRF) instrument, together with a package for the analysis of alloying elements with wide concentration ranges (See Figures 1 and 2).
Preparation of Standards and SamplesCalibration standards (CRMs), setup samples and the CRMs used to verify accuracy were resurfaced using a fine-surface milling machine with 150 grit Al2O3paper. For the harder alloys, initial resurfacing required 80 grit ZrO2 paper.
Measurement ConditionsTotal measurement time was 470 seconds, with the spectrometer operated at 2.4 kilowatts. The program includes measurements on both peak and background positions for 21 elements and ensures accuracy at low concentrations.
Master CalibrationThe setup samples were calibrated against master calibrations containing up to 126 CRMs. Master calibration accuracies are shown in Table 1, where lower Root Mean Square (RMS) and K-factor values indicate more accurate calibrations (Figures 3-6 are calibration plots for Ni, Co, Si and P). Typical compositions for the setup samples are shown in Table 2.
The FP model automatically calculates the matrix correction for the calibrations. The wide range calibrations shown in Figures 3-6 demonstrate the power of the FP model. Corrections for inter-element effects are optimized for each standard, making it possible to calibrate concentration ranges from 0 to 70 weight percent or more.
AccuracyThe accuracy of the WDXRF instrument when used in conjunction with the setup samples is illustrated in accuracy overview plots for 11 elements, which compare certified and measured values for 12 CRMs of widely varying compositions (See Table 3).
Precision and StabilityPrecision was determined by repeated measurement of a Nimonic alloy CRM against the calibration. The CRM was analyzed 20 times consecutively for a short-term precision test and 15 times over three weeks for long-term data (See Table 4, Figure 7).
Comparison of the RMS value (1s) with the Counting Statistical Error (CSE) shows both the precision of the method and the stability of the spectrometer. The similar magnitude of the RMS and CSE values shows that errors originating from the instrument are negligible.
The data shown here demonstrate that a WDXRF instrument offers a solution for the analysis of Ni-, Co- and Fe-based alloys, super alloys and steels in a single, wide-range analytical program. Analyses are accurate and precise, with excellent system stability.