Quality Magazine logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Quality Magazine logo
  • NEWS
  • PRODUCTS
    • FEATURED PRODUCTS
    • SUBMIT YOUR PRODUCT
  • CHANNELS
    • AUTOMATION
    • MANAGEMENT
    • MEASUREMENT
    • NDT
    • QUALITY 101
    • SOFTWARE
    • TEST & INSPECTION
    • VISION & SENSORS
  • MARKETS
    • AEROSPACE
    • AUTOMOTIVE
    • ENERGY
    • GREEN MANUFACTURING
    • MEDICAL
  • MEDIA
    • A WORD ON QUALITY PUZZLE
    • EBOOK
    • PODCASTS
    • VIDEOS
    • WEBINARS
  • EVENTS
    • EVENT CALENDAR
    • IMTS
  • DIRECTORIES
    • BUYERS GUIDE >
      • Supplier Insights
    • NDT SOURCEBOOK
    • VISION & SENSORS
    • TAKE A TOUR
  • INFOCENTERS
    • Digital Quality Management Systems
    • NEXT GENERATION SPC & QUALITY ANALYTICS
  • AWARDS
    • ROOKIE OF THE YEAR
    • PLANT OF THE YEAR
    • PROFESSIONAL OF THE YEAR
  • MORE
    • Expert Columns
    • NEWSLETTERS
    • QUALITY STORE
    • INDUSTRY LINKS
    • SPONSOR INSIGHTS
  • EMAG
    • eMAGAZINE
    • ARCHIVES
    • CONTACT
    • ADVERTISE
  • SIGN UP!
The Quality Industry Voices ManagementThe Quality Edge

The Quality Edge

ITAF Rule 6 Changes

The transition to the new Rules 6 must be completed by January 1, 2025, after which they will be mandatory for all audits.

By John Vandenbemden
Young man industrial engineer wearing a white helmet while check the welding on the production line in the factory.

Image Source: whitebalance.oatt / E+ / Getty Images

October 14, 2024

The certification requirements to the international standard IATF 16949 are presented in the IATF Certification Specifications (“IATF Rules”). The sixth edition of the “Rules for Achieving and Maintaining IATF Recognition” was published on March 31, 2024. It has been stated that the changes have been made to improve certifiability, audit procedures and overall efficiency. The transition to the new Rules 6 must be completed by January 1, 2025, after which they will be mandatory for all audits. The most significant changes are performance and risk-based audit days instead of the current method, which is based on employee count. The following are changes that have a significant impact, but do not represent all the changes within Rules 6.

 

Requirement

Rules 5th Edition

Rules 5th Edition

Eligibility and Certificate Structure

 

  • Automotive Vehicles shall be understood as homologated vehicles that are intended to be driven on public roads,

Note: The term homologated means the whole vehicle approval process that results in a government issued certificate

  • "Replacement Parts and materials” belong to automotive products.
  • EMS & main site must be in one legal entity and one QMS.
  • EMS & main site must be in one legal entity and one QMS with common management system.
  •  

Conflict of Interest

 

The CB can't provide QMS related consulting service to the certified client.

Certificate Structure

Completed by January 1

Allowed to perform a registration audit at the next planned audit 

Audit Timing Surveillance Audits

-3/+1 Month 

-3 /+3 months

Audit Cycles

6, 9 & 12 months

 

-3/+1 Month

 

 

  • Only 12 months
  • The interval for surveillance audits is -3/+3 months from the last audit day (due date) of the initial, transfer or recertification audit.
  • Failure to carry out a surveillance audit at the required interval will result in the certificate being withdrawn within 7 days.

Audit Planning

 

  • Add at least 0.5 days for audit planning, and input into IATF database.
  • Confirmation of Audit date for Surveillance/Recertification/Transfer Audit: at least 90 days before the audit starts, otherwise postpone audit. 
  • The client shall provide audit planning information at least 30 days before audit. If not, the CB shall consider postponing the audit to ensure audit plan to client at least 14 days before audit.
  • The client shall provide information about the received QMS related consulting service since last audit
  • If Management Review Record is not provided due to confidential consideration, add at least two hours for On-site Information Verification before Opening Meeting to the audit planning time and enter in the IATF database. 

Determination of audit days

 

The total number of employees on site (including permanent, part time, contract, average number of daily workers for the previous six (6) month period, and temporary employees); and the number of relevant employees in supporting activities (remote or on site)

 

  • Based on performance and risk-based audit,
  • When assigning an audit team, each auditor shall perform no less than one audit day.
  • One audit day = 8 hours, including time for auditing of production shifts.
  • Audit duration <= 10 hours calendar day.< li> =>

Audit Days Reduction

 

  • For a Corporate Audit Scheme <= 15% reduction< li>
  • If all possible reduction factors are added together, max. 30% reduction
  • =>

Special Audits related to performance complaints

 

The CB may appoint an auditor not part of the current audit cycle and the auditor is not considered part of the audit time for the current cycle.

Standalone remote support locations

 

Audit team is assigned and maintained for a 3-year period and shall be rotated after each 3-year period.

Special Audit following certification withdrawal

 

CB must assign an audit team ether from the previous audit cycle or from the upcoming audit cycle

IATF Observers

 

  • IATF Observers (not witness auditor) shall be allowed to observe the whole audits, with the exception for confidential client data.

Systematic problem solving

  • Client must provide initial responses to major NCs, including corrections, root causes, corrective action plan, etc., within 20 calendar days, and further responses with corrective actions and their effectiveness verifications within 60 calendar days.
  • To issue Major NC, if no effective actions in time to address customer (i.e. OEM) reported performance issues.
  • Client must provide initial responses to major NCs, including corrections, root causes, corrective action plan, etc., within 15 calendar days, and further responses with corrective actions and their effectiveness verifications within 60 calendar days.
  • Without receiving responses to NCs in time as stated above, withdraw certificate.

Stage 1 Readiness Assessment, Part 1 – System and Structure Review

 

Requires the client’s relevant top management and management team member to demonstrate the quality management system and communicate other information as needed for the auditor to understand and confirm the items required in the mandatory fields in the IATF CARA Stage 1 assessment report.

 

Stage 1 Readiness Assessment, Part 2 – Operational Review

 

Shall be based upon the “Gemba” principle to gain sufficient understanding of the QMS in operation on the shop floor,

Stage 1 Readiness Assessment Closing Meeting

 

  • The Stage 1 Readiness Assessment closing meeting shall be held with the client’s top management.
  • A complete assessment report shall be issued to the client at the closing meeting

Stage 1 Readiness Assessment Decision

 

Assessment decision within a maximum of 15 days after closing meeting and in the IATF database.

Stage 2 Certification Audit

Time between closing meeting date of the Stage 1 and start date of Stage 2 shall be no more than 90 days.

Time between closing meeting date of the Stage 1 and start date of Stage 2 shall be minimum of 20 days but no more than 90 days.

Decision on suspension

 

If suspension is due to performance complaint, the client shall provide response in IATF CMS, within 20 days after receiving suspension notification.


READ MORE

  • Inspection vs. Auditing: A conversation with John Vandenbemden
  • An Effective Management System and Lean Enterprise Require a Cultural Change
  • Performance Measures Not Always What They Appear
  • » Read More From John Vandenbemden
KEYWORDS: certification manufacturing metrology standards

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

Qm 0322 professional of the year john vandenbemden

John Vandenbemden currently sits on the ASQ Standards Committee as the Inspection Division representative. He is a voting member of TC 176 and chair of the SC5, USTAG 69 and and audits for SRI and Quality Auditing. Vandenbemden is past-chair of the ASQ Inspection Division. For more information, email [email protected].

Vandenbemden is also the 2022 Quality Professional of the Year.

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • 2024 Quality Rookie of the Year Justin Wise 1440x750px banner with "Quality Rookie of the Year" logo inset

    Meet the 2024 Quality Rookie of the Year: Justin Wise

    Justin Wise is an exceptional individual who has been...
    Aerospace
    By: Michelle Bangert
  • Man with umbrella and coat stands outside while it rains at night looking at a building.

    Nondestructive Testing: Is there an ethics problem?

    I was a whistleblower who exposed fraudulent activities...
    NDT
    By: Dale Norwood
  • Unraveling Deflategate: Football stadium with closeup of football on field

    Unraveling the Tom Brady Deflategate

    The Deflategate scandal erupted following the 2014 AFC...
    Measurement
    By: Greg Cenker and Henry Zumbrun
Manage My Account
  • eMagazine Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
  • Online Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service
  • Manage My Preferences

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the Quality audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of Quality or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • Key Takeaways for Quality Leaders
    Sponsored byComplianceQuest

    Key Takeaways for Quality Leaders from the 2026 Gartner Magic Quadrant™ for QMS

  • This image shows a person seated next to a Bobcat T66 compact track loader.
    Sponsored byPolyWorks by InnovMetric

    Supercharging Digital Gauging at Bobcat North America

  • Dorsey Calibration Lab photo by Tom LaBarbera Picture this Studios
    Sponsored byDorsey Metrology International

    Ensuring Product Quality in a Competitive Manufacturing Landscape

Popular Stories

a titanium diaphragm speaker driver

The One Thing Elon Gets Right Is Designed to Scare You

This image shows a person seated next to a Bobcat T66 compact track loader.

Supercharging Digital Gauging at Bobcat North America

Dorsey Calibration Lab photo by Tom LaBarbera Picture this Studios

Ensuring Product Quality in a Competitive Manufacturing Landscape

2026 Quality Professional of the Year!

Events

June 9, 2026

Future-Proof your Quality Processes with Advanced 3D Optical CMM Technology

Discover how to effortlessly capture complex data, leverage true multi-sensor automation, and ensure continuous operation without creating inspection delays.

June 22, 2026

Automate 2026

Automate is North America's largest robotics and automation event — and the best place to take your ideas from insight to impact.
 
Our show floor features the world’s leading automation solutions, from AI and robotics to motion control, vision systems, and more. Plus, our educational conference is second to none, led by the brightest minds in automation today.
 
Ready to transform the way you work? Take the next step at Automate.
View All Submit An Event

Products

Lean Manufacturing and Service Fundamentals, Applications, and Case Studies

Lean Manufacturing and Service Fundamentals, Applications, and Case Studies

See More Products
Quality Podcast Channel Custom Content

Related Articles

  • This image shows a person working with technical drawings and industrial machinery in a manufacturing setting.

    Third Revision of ISO 2859-1

    See More
  • Cropped and blurred image of a man touching the screen with ISO and globe icons on smart background.

    Configuration Management: Consistency in Product Performance and Design Throughout Its Lifecycle

    See More
  • April 2024 John Vandenbemden column feature image of climage change from green growth to barren land.

    Climate Change and Management Standards

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • Online Ad - 6 months

  • A Lean Supply Chain at John Deere DVD

  • 9780367691196 (1).jpg

    Manufacturing Mastery

See More Products
×

Stay in the know with Quality’s comprehensive coverage of
the manufacturing and metrology industries.

Newsletters | Website | eMagazine

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Manufacturing Division
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • Newsletters
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Market Research
    • Reprints
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2026. All Rights Reserved BNP Media, Inc. and BNP Media II, LLC.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing