Quality Magazine logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Quality Magazine logo
  • NEWS
  • PRODUCTS
    • FEATURED PRODUCTS
    • SUBMIT YOUR PRODUCT
  • CHANNELS
    • AUTOMATION
    • MANAGEMENT
    • MEASUREMENT
    • NDT
    • QUALITY 101
    • SOFTWARE
    • TEST & INSPECTION
    • VISION & SENSORS
  • MARKETS
    • AEROSPACE
    • AUTOMOTIVE
    • ENERGY
    • GREEN MANUFACTURING
    • MEDICAL
  • MEDIA
    • A WORD ON QUALITY PUZZLE
    • EBOOK
    • PODCASTS
    • VIDEOS
    • WEBINARS
  • EVENTS
    • EVENT CALENDAR
    • IMTS
  • DIRECTORIES
    • BUYERS GUIDE >
      • Supplier Insights
    • NDT SOURCEBOOK
    • VISION & SENSORS
    • TAKE A TOUR
  • INFOCENTERS
    • Digital Quality Management Systems
    • NEXT GENERATION SPC & QUALITY ANALYTICS
  • AWARDS
    • ROOKIE OF THE YEAR
    • PLANT OF THE YEAR
    • PROFESSIONAL OF THE YEAR
  • MORE
    • Expert Columns
    • NEWSLETTERS
    • QUALITY STORE
    • INDUSTRY LINKS
    • SPONSOR INSIGHTS
  • EMAG
    • eMAGAZINE
    • ARCHIVES
    • CONTACT
    • ADVERTISE
  • SIGN UP!
Test & Inspection

Test & Inspection

What’s Wrong with a Zero Leak Test Specification?

This article is designed to assist people that test for leaks using air in industrial quality control and want to learn how they can determine a leak test specification beyond zero leaks.

By Anne-Marie Dewailly
ATEQ

Image Source: ATEQ

September 13, 2024
✕
Image in modal.

Leak testing is a critical quality control test in the manufacture of many parts and products. The leak rate for products manufactured in the past can be applied to the next generation of these products. The lack of prior history to draw from has contributed to leak specifications with a Zero Leak rate.

This article will provide a guideline for determining a leak testing specification by first exploring the factors included. It will explore the easiest route via modifying an existing leak testing specifications rate from an application already in use with included examples. When that is not an option, it will provide an overview of creating a new leak test specification and the various factors included.

“Why can’t I just say I want my part to have zero leaks?”

What’s wrong with a Zero Leak rate?

Everything leaks; it is just a question of how much. Also, not all materials or gases leak in the same way. A highly viscous liquid may not leak from a hole where air would. Also, certain materials are porous to a gas but not a liquid. For example, glass is porous to Helium gas but not other gasses or liquids.

While a product specification of zero leaks may seem desirable, particularly if the consequence of a leak is high, it is unrealistic because everything leaks. As an example, the leak rate for certain products in military applications is a single air bubble over a 100-year period[1]. This stringent leak rate is still not a Zero Leak rate specification. Since there is no such thing as a 100% leak-free component, the key is to determine what leak rate is acceptable to manufacture products that are safe or adequate for the customer’s needs and can be manufactured cost-effectively.

To some people, a “no leak” means “a specified acceptable amount of leakage.”

The Anatomy of a Leak Test Specification

All leak test specification have been constructed based on the following factors:

READ MORE

  • How to Improve Quality Control by Managing a Drifting Zero Point during Air Leak Testing
  • Two-Point Calibration: The Key to an Accurate, Repeatable Leak Test
  • The Rise of Differential Pressure (DP) Decay Leak Testing in North America

Characterizing Failure Conditions: In many instances, a product capability backed by a product warranty will begin to define a leak test specification. A manufacturer can market their smartwatch as usable while swimming or that a smartphone can operate after being dropped in a 6 ft pool without water damage. Compliance with product capability driven by regulations or oversight common in the Healthcare industry can define a failure condition. Necessary shelf life can also define a failure condition, like a fire extinguisher holding its charge for 10 years.

Test Medium: The material of consequence or the equivalent for the leak test. Water ingress into a watch may be the material of consequence, but the test medium could be air, thereby not damaging a leaking part. Helium is a viable test medium, but there are other factors to consider, such as cost, and it may be overkill for most applications and is outside the scope of this article.

Test Time: Defines the accumulation time of the test medium. The duration is often expressed in standard time periods, such as one second, one minute or one hour. In cases where the test time exceeds these time periods, like one air bubble in 100 years, an equivalent test medium is used with one of these aforementioned common test periods.  

Total Leakage Amount: Defines the threshold quantity of test medium that should not be exceeded over the test duration. The leakage amount is expressed in a volumetric value, typically cubic centimeters or liters. It is important to emphasize that the leakage amount is the combined quality from all leaks of the test medium over the test time. Therefore, numerous small leaks can have the same total leakage amount as one large leak.  

Test Conditions: This specifies what parameters to conduct the leak test. Typically, the test conditions incorporate the normal operating conditions of the product to be tested. At the very least, they should define the test pressure.

Leak Rate Specification: The leak rate is the combination of the above items into one leak rate test parameter, expressed as sccm[2].  At times a bubble rate is used as a leak rate specification. Bubble sizes can vary[3], whereby an air leak rate is recommended[4]. NOTE: A flow rate may also be used.

Existing Leak Test Specification Examples

The following are some examples of leak test specification ranges for various applications, providing a starting point for engineers who are required to determine leak testing specifications for a product. A negative test pressure is a vacuum. 

Product

Oil Pan

Muffler / Catalytic Converter

Radiator

EV Battery Tray

EV Battery Pack

EV Battery Coolant Circuit

Medical Container

Leak Rate

0.5 - 4 sccm

20 - 300 sccm

0.5 - 10 sccm

10 - 300 sccm

10 - 400 sccm

1 - 12 sccm

.0137 sccm

Test Pressure

7.25 psi

7.25 psi

14.5 psi or 1 bar

-(0.5) - 4 psi

-(0.5) - 4 psi

25 - 55 psi

8-60 PSI

Part Volume

2-5 liters

3-8 liters

2-12 liters

250 liters

300 - 450 liters

1-15 liters

40ml - 1 liter

The following values are provided for illustrative purposes

Numerous other applications can be drawn upon.  

Side view of a tire with a white background.
Image Source: ATEQ

Basic Approach to Creating a Leak Test Specification

If no prior applications exist to draw from when creating a leak test specification, the simplest method is to create a specification containing air pressure for a given amount of time.  In the following example, we will use a car tire filled with air and calculate an air leak test specification.

Characterizing Failure Conditions: A car tire is able to hold 30 PSI pressure in the wheel for one year while only losing 3 PSI of pressure drop in six months. 

Test Medium: Air.  

Test Time: Six months. 

Total Leakage Amount: To be calculated based on the volume of the tire. 

Test Conditions: 30 PSI, operating at room (ambient) temperature. 

The formula for calculating the Leak Rate is as follows;

Leak Rate (sccm) = 0.0006 x Part Volume (cm³) x Pressure Drop per Second (Pa/Sec)

Part Volume: 

Part (Tire) Volume = 30,000 cc 

Pressure Drop per Second: Expressed in Pascals[5] per Second. 

3 PSI = 3 * 6894.75729 Pascals or 20,684 Pascals 

6 months = 15,552,000 seconds. 

Pressure Drop per Second is 20,684/15,552,000 = 0.00133 Pa/sec

Leak Rate = 0.0006 x 30,000 cc x 0.00133 Pa/sec = 0.024 sccm 

The Theoretical Approach to Creating a Leak Test Specification

Calculating a leak rate involves a number of physics-related factors. The good news is that formulas are available to make this easier. The following are provided for information purposes, as the full explanation of these factors is outside the scope of this article.  

At a high level, the physics factors for calculating a leak rate are as follows:

Surface Tension: A water spider captures the impact of surface tension. Without surface tension, the spider could not stay on the surface. The same condition will apply to a leak. A small enough hole will allow air to escape but hold water or another liquid. The effect of surface tension of a liquid on a surface is quantified by a physical property called contact angle.

Flow Types: Not all flow is equal. The three main Airflow models that impact a leak rate are as follows;

Laminar: the most commonly used on thick wall leak path

Turbulent: commonly used on thin wall leak paths, below 2 atmospheres of absolute pressure, or vacuum above ½ atmosphere

Supersonic: commonly used on high pressures above 2 atmospheres absolute or in vacuum less than ½ atmosphere

Channel Length: The length or depth of the leak is a critical factor in calculating a leak test specification and also impacts the Flow Types.  

Hole Geometry: Rarely is a hole perfectly round. Hole geometry can impact a leak rate.

The porosity of the Material: A wine bottle illustrates the impact of porosity. If the pore size of the natural cork is small enough, the wine’s surface tension will be more than its weight, and the wine will stay inside the bottle.

Conclusion

Everything leaks; therefore, a product specification of zero leaks is not achievable. The key is to define the acceptable leakage amount. The easiest method is to utilize the leak test specification of existing products. When that is not an option, a leak test specification can be calculated using the product failure conditions. Moreover, behind the calculation of a leak rate are a number of physics factors that should be considered.  At the very least, hopefully, this article has lowered some of the shroud of mystery around creating a leak test specification and reinforced by a Zero Leak specification is not advised.

[1] MIL SPEC 883 Class K specifies a leak rate of 3 x 10-11

[2] Standard Cubic Centimeters per Minute.

[3] Champagne Bubbles have a diameter of 1.5mm. 2mm is used as the default diameter of a water bubble.

[4] Video showing air leak and bubble rates https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8JQNPePIXY

[5] 1 PSI = 6894.75729 Pascals.

KEYWORDS: leak testing leak testing equipment manufacturing metrology

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

Anne-Marie Dewailly is the technical director of ATEQ North America with 35 years of industrial leak test experience in some of the most demanding applications in automotive, EV, Medical, Consumer Electronics, and other industrial sectors. www.atequsa.com. For more, watch youtube.com/watch?v=xmfK9IL3vTU.

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • 2024 Quality Rookie of the Year Justin Wise 1440x750px banner with "Quality Rookie of the Year" logo inset

    Meet the 2024 Quality Rookie of the Year: Justin Wise

    Justin Wise is an exceptional individual who has been...
    Aerospace
    By: Michelle Bangert
  • Man with umbrella and coat stands outside while it rains at night looking at a building.

    Nondestructive Testing: Is there an ethics problem?

    I was a whistleblower who exposed fraudulent activities...
    NDT
    By: Dale Norwood
  • Unraveling Deflategate: Football stadium with closeup of football on field

    Unraveling the Tom Brady Deflategate

    The Deflategate scandal erupted following the 2014 AFC...
    Measurement
    By: Greg Cenker and Henry Zumbrun
Manage My Account
  • eMagazine Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
  • Online Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service
  • Manage My Preferences

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the Quality audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of Quality or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • Key Takeaways for Quality Leaders
    Sponsored byComplianceQuest

    Key Takeaways for Quality Leaders from the 2026 Gartner Magic Quadrant™ for QMS

  • This image shows a person seated next to a Bobcat T66 compact track loader.
    Sponsored byPolyWorks by InnovMetric

    Supercharging Digital Gauging at Bobcat North America

  • Dorsey Calibration Lab photo by Tom LaBarbera Picture this Studios
    Sponsored byDorsey Metrology International

    Ensuring Product Quality in a Competitive Manufacturing Landscape

Popular Stories

This image shows a person seated next to a Bobcat T66 compact track loader.

Supercharging Digital Gauging at Bobcat North America

Dorsey Calibration Lab photo by Tom LaBarbera Picture this Studios

Ensuring Product Quality in a Competitive Manufacturing Landscape

a professional in the aviation field performing maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) work

Manufacturing Retention: Strategies for Improving Company Culture, Engagement and Skill Development

2026 Quality Professional of the Year!

Events

June 22, 2026

Automate 2026

Automate is North America's largest robotics and automation event — and the best place to take your ideas from insight to impact.
 
Our show floor features the world’s leading automation solutions, from AI and robotics to motion control, vision systems, and more. Plus, our educational conference is second to none, led by the brightest minds in automation today.
 
Ready to transform the way you work? Take the next step at Automate.
July 14, 2026

Quality Leaders Forum: Better Communication, Better Quality Data

The Quality Leaders Forum is a quarterly, editor-moderated fireside chat series hosted by Quality Magazine, featuring candid conversations with senior manufacturing and operations executives shaping enterprise-level quality.

View All Submit An Event

Products

Lean Manufacturing and Service Fundamentals, Applications, and Case Studies

Lean Manufacturing and Service Fundamentals, Applications, and Case Studies

See More Products
Quality Podcast Channel Custom Content

Related Articles

  • Face of Quality: What's Wrong with Strategic Planning?

    See More
  • ATEQ FP726-LV

    How to Improve Quality Control by Managing a Drifting Zero Point during Air Leak Testing

    See More
  • helium canisters

    Supply, Demand and Cost: Don’t Let That Helium Just Drift Away at the End of a Leak Test

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • Mistake Proofing: Achieving Zero Defects DVD

  • What Lean Means DVD

  • image.jpg

    Management Lessons from Taiichi Ohno: What Every Leader Can Learn from the Man who Invented the Toyota Production System

See More Products
×

Stay in the know with Quality’s comprehensive coverage of
the manufacturing and metrology industries.

Newsletters | Website | eMagazine

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Manufacturing Division
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • Newsletters
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Market Research
    • Reprints
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2026. All Rights Reserved BNP Media, Inc. and BNP Media II, LLC.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing